stan1953
Well-Known Member
- Mar 23, 2012
- 3,278
- 64
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- CA-Liberals
I just reread your question and my answer. Seemed to me that my answer was quite clear and thorough. It seemed at least as clear as your question.
I went into a few extra details because you seem to have lost sight of some of the basics. That was my charge originally concerning non-sovereignty folks in general. I'm just trying to get you back up to snuff. If you're offended by that you shouldn't have lost sight of the basics to begin with IMO.
I'm a little disappointed that you are starting to get a little uncivil.
How about this answer.
We put on the armor of God to stand against the enemy for the same reason Jesus used the Word of God to stand against the devil.
You wouldn't say that God had "relinquished control" just because His Son had to fight the enemy to overcome sin. Why would you say that He has relinquished control just because we are asked to do the same thing?
Jesus' every activity was a part of the concurrent working out of what God had ordained to take place in time and space. Jesus was (as He said), "only doing what He saw the Father doing."
Same with our Godly activities.
I would worry about your own replies, I am up to snuff, just not yours.
Verboseness as far as I am concerned is designed to obscure a persons actual POV by hiding it in it's midst. It doesn't take huge replies to make a point, just don't follow some people's example of short replies that say NOTHING.
It's always those that start with being uncivil that point it out in others.
So exactly what kind of control does God have as it relates to Eph 6? If we are instructed to put on armor then who is in control of the outcome, us or God?
Upvote
0