Why worship?

Jeremy E Walker

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2014
897
16
✟1,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
But the question is, is God worthy?

That is a question that each person will indeed have to answer and it will determine their eternal destiny.

If you ask one who worships God if God is worthy of worship, it will not be surprising to find they answer in the affirmative.

But ask a man who worships himself if God is worthy of worship. It will not be surprising to find they answer no.

To some, God is not worthy of worship. To some, He is.

As far as myself, He is worthy of worship, honor, praise, and my life as a living sacrifice.

Why you might ask?

Well for me, Jesus Christ is what I treasure and value most, yay, even more than life itself. It means I reverence Him, honor Him, fear Him, respect Him, and love Him.

Every man has a master and every man worships his master. But a man cannot have two masters.

A man will either have God or he will not.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Well for me, Jesus Christ is what I treasure and value most, yay, even more than life itself. It means I reverence Him, honor Him, fear Him, respect Him, and love Him.
Why do you treasure, value, revere, honour, fear, respect, and love Jesus?

Every man has a master and every man worships his master. But a man cannot have two masters.

A man will either have God or he will not.
I'd tentatively agree with that, but does it matter if one's master isn't God? What if one's master is, say, curing cancer or ending poverty?
 
Upvote 0

South Bound

I stand with Israel.
Jan 3, 2014
4,443
1,034
✟31,159.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I would say He deserves it. He's done some pretty amazing stuffs. Look at pictures from NOVA or National Geographic; you'll agree it's quite impressive. Would you agree that it is impressive stuff?

That's praise, not worship.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
To glorify your God.
Is it possible to believe in God, believe he is your creator, died for our sins, loves us, etc, and not want to glorify him?

The impetus behind the thread was to look at how one goes from belief in God to the desire to worship God. Much of the dialogue with Christianity is in working out whether there's any good reason to believe in God. But I want to jump ahead to the next question: even if God were shown to exist, why should we worship him? If the purpose of God is to glorify him, the question remains: why should we work to glorify him?
 
Upvote 0

South Bound

I stand with Israel.
Jan 3, 2014
4,443
1,034
✟31,159.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi, are you able to define what worship is? Is praising God not an act of worship, ie if you are praising Him are you worshipping Him?

To put it simply, praise is honoring God for the things He has done, while worship is honoring God for who He is, for His nature and characteristics.

It's not a huge distinction, but little distinctions add up after a while.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
To put it simply, praise is honoring God for the things He has done, while worship is honoring God for who He is, for His nature and characteristics.

It's not a huge distinction, but little distinctions add up after a while.
Thanks for that. For the purpose of this thread, do you think this definition of worship is sufficient and complete? (please read from Post #73 where op has specified actions such as building temples, singing and praying).
 
Upvote 0
T

theophilus777

Guest
Why do you treasure, value, revere, honour, fear, respect, and love Jesus?

It's possible you never saw my post #100. Anyway, this is another great question. This is behavior that needs to be cultivated. God can show us that He Himself is better than ... fill in the blank as appropriate, but eventually it comes down to anything else. This is of course highly personal. Its still up to us not to lose track of such revelation. In this way, worship benefits us, and is something we need, but there is nothing to indicate it benefits Him in any way.

I'd tentatively agree with that, but does it matter if one's master isn't God? What if one's master is, say, curing cancer or ending poverty?

Who our "master" is, and/or the presence of false idols in our life, can be hidden from us, and deeply troubling when discovered. I would think the examples you gave really aren't in that category at all but might be serving God even if done for some other motive. This idea is inherent to archaic words like "the Lord tries the heart."

Is it possible to believe in God, believe he is your creator, died for our sins, loves us, etc, and not want to glorify him?

Oh definitely. Some of us spent lots of time being angry at God for one thing or another, even though we had full knowledge of your list, and etc. Hebrews 11 has a thought on the topic:

"But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him."

This "cometh" stuff is worship. The relevant part is that we won't do it while we remain unaware of the reward. There is nothing altruistic about worship, it is very much a "what's in it for me?" kind of thing. Kidding ourselves otherwise is just putting on airs.

The impetus behind the thread was to look at how one goes from belief in God to the desire to worship God.

And what a wonderful topic it is! Thank you.

Much of the dialogue with Christianity is in working out whether there's any good reason to believe in God. But I want to jump ahead to the next question:

Somebody else (I forget who) mentioned that you're smart. As simple as it is, this act shows me a high level of intelligence. Folks don't usually get anywhere discussing the former. We believers may get a lot of good out of sharing our various ways we know He's there, but that def doesn't translate well to non-believers, with exceptions being few and far between. It really is a personal decision, and God respects that. How He decides to dole out personal revelation is interesting to me, for the reasons I gave above (the reward thing)

even if God were shown to exist, why should we worship him? If the purpose of God is to glorify him, the question remains: why should we work to glorify him?

More basic, what do the words "to glorify Him" really mean? I think that merits a lot of attention. For example, a lot of worship leaders, both in preaching and music, wind up pursuing their own glory far more than His. Its a common mistake, so I guess its an easy trap to fall into. But that doesn't apply to most folks so its more important to see how this relates to each individual. For you, making sure you at least have a reasonable working definition might be enough?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
It's possible you never saw my post #100. Anyway, this is another great question. This is behavior that needs to be cultivated. God can show us that He Himself is better than ... fill in the blank as appropriate, but eventually it comes down to anything else. This is of course highly personal. Its still up to us not to lose track of such revelation. In this way, worship benefits us, and is something we need, but there is nothing to indicate it benefits Him in any way.
If it beneficial, then that alone would answer the OP - Why worship God? Because if benefits you. So, what are the benefits of worship? What happens that wouldn't happen if you didn't worship?

You say that we need to worship. That's quite a strong sentiment - 'need' implies that we can't not do it. So what does happen if we don't?

Who our "master" is, and/or the presence of false idols in our life, can be hidden from us, and deeply troubling when discovered. I would think the examples you gave really aren't in that category at all but might be serving God even if done for some other motive. This idea is inherent to archaic words like "the Lord tries the heart."
It's a sticky issue, as others have espoused different ideas on what constitute 'false gods'. Someone said that everyone worships something, that everyone worships whatever they hold up highest; this would imply it's a concious, recognisable thing, even if it's as abstract as 'the pursuit of science'.

Is it possible to not have a master, hidden or otherwise? Certainly some people are obsessed about one singular thing - money, power, God, etc - but some people aren't, and some people are only moderately obsessed with several things simultaneously.

Oh definitely. Some of us spent lots of time being angry at God for one thing or another, even though we had full knowledge of your list, and etc. Hebrews 11 has a thought on the topic:

"But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him."

This "cometh" stuff is worship. The relevant part is that we won't do it while we remain unaware of the reward. There is nothing altruistic about worship, it is very much a "what's in it for me?" kind of thing. Kidding ourselves otherwise is just putting on airs.
That seems very much at odds with what other people have said in this thread, that worship is the act of holding God as most worthy/valuable, that God is worshipped because it glorifies him not us, that he is worthy not us, etc. The idea of personal gain is a new one.

Somebody else (I forget who) mentioned that you're smart. As simple as it is, this act shows me a high level of intelligence. Folks don't usually get anywhere discussing the former. We believers may get a lot of good out of sharing our various ways we know He's there, but that def doesn't translate well to non-believers, with exceptions being few and far between.
When you drill down to the bedrock of why a person believes, it usually comes down to something subjective. A personal revelation, a personal sequence of events that screams 'God', etc. These things are intractably non-communicable, so are useless in converting the non-believer.

Some people believe on more empirical foundations, but I find these are invariably over-extensions of what the data say. Others believe on logical arguments (Kalam, teleological, etc), but these are specious at best.

And that just about summarises my nine-year study of CF :p People believe in God because of a) specious logic, b) dodgy science, or more usually, c) personal and non-communicable revelation.

This conclusion doesn't seem to be in danger of changing any time soon, hence why I've jumped to phase 2. It was also spurred by my contemplation of Exodus - I concluded that I couldn't worship God even if I believed he existed, because of his mass-killing of the firstborns of Egypt. This lead me to wonder if I would worship him if that didn't happen - and I could come up with no good reason to. "God exists? Cool. Now, back to The Sims 3...".

It really is a personal decision, and God respects that. How He decides to dole out personal revelation is interesting to me, for the reasons I gave above (the reward thing)
It certainly raises a thorny issue - if person X believes because of personal revelation, and person Y doesn't believe because they lack personal revelation, then person Y's non-belief is entirely God's fault for not indwelling them with said revelation. So how can it be right that they should burn in Hell for eternity?

More basic, what do the words "to glorify Him" really mean? I think that merits a lot of attention. For example, a lot of worship leaders, both in preaching and music, wind up pursuing their own glory far more than His. Its a common mistake, so I guess its an easy trap to fall into. But that doesn't apply to most folks so its more important to see how this relates to each individual. For you, making sure you at least have a reasonable working definition might be enough?
As oi_antz said, I gave a few tentative examples of what would constitute worship - singing hymns, building temples, etc. That, to me, is worship. Beyond the enjoyment of the acts themselves (being a CoE boy, I love a good hymn as much as the next guy), I don't understand how someone goes from "I believe God exists" to "I will build temples".

People have alluded to doing it because it glorifies God - well, why bother glorifying God? Does he need it? Do we?

Others have said it's because God is their creator, sustainer, and giver of eternal life - well, why does that make him worthy of worship? Gratitude, maybe, but worship?

Others have said it's simply because they love God - well, why do you love God?

And round and round we go.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I don't understand how someone goes from "I believe God exists" to "I will build temples".

People have alluded to doing it because it glorifies God - well, why bother glorifying God? Does he need it? Do we?

Others have said it's because God is their creator, sustainer, and giver of eternal life - well, why does that make him worthy of worship? Gratitude, maybe, but worship?

Others have said it's simply because they love God - well, why do you love God?

And round and round we go.
As for building temples, you do have to remember that many churches just put a roof up that is big enough for everyone to get together. When you are discussing the grandiose style and excessive investment into impressions, then you can ask the same thing about any place that humans have done this with. Architecture is fashion, it could simply be an expression for that purpose.
 
Upvote 0

Jeremy E Walker

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2014
897
16
✟1,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Why do you treasure, value, revere, honour, fear, respect, and love Jesus?

Lots of reasons. Too many to list them all.

I value Him because He caused me to be. I love Him because He first loved me.


I'd tentatively agree with that, but does it matter if one's master isn't God? What if one's master is, say, curing cancer or ending poverty?

Humanity's deepest need is not to be delivered from the effects of poverty or the effects of cancer. Humanity's deepest need is deliverance from sin. For sin is why cancer and poverty exists in the first place. Sin is why a perfect creation has been spoiled and languishes in ever increasing decay.

Cancer and poverty are mere symptoms of a disease that exists within the heart of ever human being. Tomorrow world hunger could end and cancer be vanquished and men would still be walking around with the disease of sin within their hearts. They would still be hating one another. Men would still be selfish and self-seeking and unloving and greedy. So if one makes as their master, the pursuit of curing cancer and ending poverty, they are seeking to find a band-aid instead of a cure.

Why not have as one's master, The Only One who can cure this universal malady known as sin?
 
Upvote 0
T

theophilus777

Guest
If it beneficial, then that alone would answer the OP - Why worship God? Because if benefits you. So, what are the benefits of worship?

Thanks for your response. This has the makings of a great convo!

I am tempted to put up a Bible verse I feel is relevant here, but I check myself. Posting that may mean nothing to you, and it may be far more significant to you if I put this in my own words? I just feel that the verse in mind is far more succinct than I could be. So let me ask first, what is your background with the Bible? Some people hear one word they recognize as being Scripture and cringe; I'd rather not have that effect on you if I can avoid it. Or you might be generally familiar with at least most of the NT, and able to place a verse you recognize into an intellectual setting and advance the conversation?


What happens that wouldn't happen if you didn't worship?

You say that we need to worship. That's quite a strong sentiment - 'need' implies that we can't not do it. So what does happen if we don't?

I worded that sloppily, so good call. It is believers that benefit from worship, so we (believers) are the ones that maintain our relationship with our Savior in part by worship. that is probably a better wording, but it makes me question myself, if anything we do to maintain our relationship with Him counts as worship ... I find this an interesting question, but I'll wait for your response about my proposed use of Scripture before addressing your questions here, which are very good, and deserving of very good answers.

It's a sticky issue, as others have espoused different ideas on what constitute 'false gods'. Someone said that everyone worships something, that everyone worships whatever they hold up highest; this would imply it's a concious, recognisable thing, even if it's as abstract as 'the pursuit of science'.

I would say it's def a sticky issue, but I wouldn't say that you, personally, def worship something. I would say that God knows, and He has def labeled things in my life I was unaware of as a "god" He might be jealous of, so I don;t agree that said idolatry need be conscious. Let me explore this a bit further and say that if a scientist were chiefly pursuing their own recognition (namesake, glory) God might see it as negative worship, while the same exact actions by the same person but done to benefit humanity might be seen as good works.

This illustrates why we Christians really should stay far away from condemning anyone. I find that thought agrees with the words of Jesus, as we have them recorded in Scripture.

Is it possible to not have a master, hidden or otherwise? Certainly some people are obsessed about one singular thing - money, power, God, etc - but some people aren't, and some people are only moderately obsessed with several things simultaneously.

"Moderately obsessed?" lol. would that be moderation, in stead of obsession?

Anyway your real question here is something I don't know. It seems reasonable to me and I'd like it to be as you suggest. What I will state is that God's vantage point is considerably different from our own, and can be surprising when He shows us. I'd rather get those surprises out of the way ASAP, rather than having them waiting for me like a boom to be lowered on my head.

That seems very much at odds with what other people have said in this thread, that worship is the act of holding God as most worthy/valuable, that God is worshipped because it glorifies him not us, that he is worthy not us, etc. The idea of personal gain is a new one.

Glad to help :)

I think the benign passage from Hebrews I included makes that point. I didn't mean to push aside the contribution of others that you refer to here, only to add to it because I saw that as lacking in this thread. Further, its interesting to me that while the ordinary and conscious sort of worship you refer to here is legitimate, God is also concerned with the kind of worship we're unaware of ourselves. This is what it means when Scripture says He is a "jealous God." I don't think it really ascribes human emotion to Him, it just tries to give us something to relate to. And again, that is chiefly for our benefit, not His.

When you drill down to the bedrock of why a person believes, it usually comes down to something subjective. A personal revelation, a personal sequence of events that screams 'God', etc. These things are intractably non-communicable, so are useless in converting the non-believer.

"Intractably noncommunicable." Hmmm, I'll have to think about this. I am not above learning from an atheist, and you may have a point.

I do agree that we all need some "bedrock" upon which to believe, and I believe Scripture makes this clear. This is one reason I find it easy not to condemn an atheist; my assumption going in is that you have no such bedrock, and God knows this. Perhaps He wants to establish something like that in your life, (the generalized or collective "your") perhaps He wishes to use me to facilitate that somehow - and perhaps not.

Some people believe on more empirical foundations, but I find these are invariably over-extensions of what the data say. Others believe on logical arguments (Kalam, teleological, etc), but these are specious at best.

Bedrock is empirical. Is it simultaneously intractably noncommunicable, at least to a non believer? Thank you for posing this question.

And that just about summarises my nine-year study of CF :p People believe in God because of a) specious logic, b) dodgy science, or more usually, c) personal and non-communicable revelation.

I would say if this is mostly what you've encountered, that's because here you come across people who are more committed to their Faith than is representative of the general population. I find lots of people who believe because that's the way they were raised which gives rise to oddball statements like "I've been a Christian all my life," etc. Its wonderful when Church leadership like that gets saved! My current Pastor is in that category, and now has a real and living relationship with my Savior. He does a good job in his leadership role, too.

This conclusion doesn't seem to be in danger of changing any time soon, hence why I've jumped to phase 2. It was also spurred by my contemplation of Exodus - I concluded that I couldn't worship God even if I believed he existed, because of his mass-killing of the firstborns of Egypt. This lead me to wonder if I would worship him if that didn't happen - and I could come up with no good reason to. "God exists? Cool. Now, back to The Sims 3...".

If I might, allow me to add some pertinent info to your consideration of Sims 2:

the story never happened. Surely you know that's what the physical evidence suggests? So, what is the story about? Surely you realize it was never about teaching anyone to go fight, kill, or commit genocide? Now how about realizing that the whole thing refers to sin? Literally, the whole Exodus story. Not just this one plague you rightly find horribly, but Passover to the occupation of Canann. Amazing when you put a story into context, how the implications change.

It certainly raises a thorny issue - if person X believes because of personal revelation, and person Y doesn't believe because they lack personal revelation, then person Y's non-belief is entirely God's fault for not indwelling them with said revelation. So how can it be right that they should burn in Hell for eternity?

This issue is not thorny at all! My gut reaction is to respond with a smiling face and a Roman Catholic Priestly "bless you my Son." lol.

What you have right there is the basis of Faith. (We can develop that concept logically, if you wish) This logic is not specious at all, and may shed light on what I referred to above as bedrock that is empirical. You would likely come up with better verbiage for what I mean, once you understood it.

As oi_antz said, I gave a few tentative examples of what would constitute worship - singing hymns, building temples, etc. That, to me, is worship. Beyond the enjoyment of the acts themselves (being a CoE boy, I love a good hymn as much as the next guy), I don't understand how someone goes from "I believe God exists" to "I will build temples".

Ah, so you were "born knowing how to sing 4 part harmony?" (Robin Williams joke) Allow me to point out it is entirely possibly for 2 people to sing the same hymn next to each other, and one is worshiping while the other is not.

Looking at the Biblical origin of building Temples is very neat, IMHO. I think I can make that examination quick and painless, with your permission ...

People have alluded to doing it because it glorifies God - well, why bother glorifying God? Does he need it? Do we?

Wow, that'a a great question too. I'm going to hope one of my fellow Christians is led to answer this one. I can respond to lots of this, but would rather read someone else on this point.

Others have said it's because God is their creator, sustainer, and giver of eternal life - well, why does that make him worthy of worship? Gratitude, maybe, but worship?

Others have said it's simply because they love God - well, why do you love God?

I sincerely hope I get to inject some of this into tomorrow's worship service. Not the doubt, but the introspection, cleansing, and the exhilaration it can bring. I look forward to see how this conversation develops ...
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Thanks for your response. This has the makings of a great convo!

I am tempted to put up a Bible verse I feel is relevant here, but I check myself. Posting that may mean nothing to you, and it may be far more significant to you if I put this in my own words? I just feel that the verse in mind is far more succinct than I could be. So let me ask first, what is your background with the Bible? Some people hear one word they recognize as being Scripture and cringe; I'd rather not have that effect on you if I can avoid it. Or you might be generally familiar with at least most of the NT, and able to place a verse you recognize into an intellectual setting and advance the conversation?
I'd say I'm fairly familiar with the Bible. I've read it, I've discussed various parts of it in-depth (mostly Genesis, some Exodus, Leviticus, and Romans).

If you cite the Bible, I won't cringe, but neither will I nod along sagely and uncritically. If you quote the Bible, I'll examine it on its own merits - it seems daft to dismiss something just because it's in the Bible, and equally daft to accept it as truth just because it's in the Bible. If it's valid, it's valid. If it's not, it's not. I often cite Jesus in Mark 12:31 when explaining what the Golden Rule is, as it's a recognisable and nicely succinct utterance of the Rule.

I would say it's def a sticky issue, but I wouldn't say that you, personally, def worship something. I would say that God knows, and He has def labeled things in my life I was unaware of as a "god" He might be jealous of, so I don;t agree that said idolatry need be conscious. Let me explore this a bit further and say that if a scientist were chiefly pursuing their own recognition (namesake, glory) God might see it as negative worship, while the same exact actions by the same person but done to benefit humanity might be seen as good works.
So 'worshipping' a 'false god' can, in some cases, be a good thing?

This illustrates why we Christians really should stay far away from condemning anyone. I find that thought agrees with the words of Jesus, as we have them recorded in Scripture.
Well, Jesus himself was quite heavy on the judgement and condemnation.

"Moderately obsessed?" lol. would that be moderation, in stead of obsession?

Anyway your real question here is something I don't know. It seems reasonable to me and I'd like it to be as you suggest. What I will state is that God's vantage point is considerably different from our own, and can be surprising when He shows us. I'd rather get those surprises out of the way ASAP, rather than having them waiting for me like a boom to be lowered on my head.
I think everyone has a set of priorities in a rough hierarchy, and there's going to be something at the top (even if it's as basal as 'eat' or 'stay warm'), but I guess I've just never seen the sense in saying that having uppermost priorities is 'worshipping' 'false gods'. It just muddies otherwise good language. But then, maybe that's what the Hebrews originally meant. Or maybe they actually did mean actual literal deities, as was all the rage in Mesopotamia at the time.

A lot of the older OT seems to be establishing the Hebrews as 'distinct' - we circumcise, we only eat kosher food, we have only one god, our god doesn't desire human sacrifice (which is the oft-misunderstood point of God telling Abraham to kill his son). So I don't think they'd pay much attention to such a niche psychological thing as 'uppermost priorities' - IMO, they were concerned with actual worship of actual false deities.

"Intractably noncommunicable." Hmmm, I'll have to think about this. I am not above learning from an atheist, and you may have a point.

I do agree that we all need some "bedrock" upon which to believe, and I believe Scripture makes this clear. This is one reason I find it easy not to condemn an atheist; my assumption going in is that you have no such bedrock, and God knows this. Perhaps He wants to establish something like that in your life, (the generalized or collective "your") perhaps He wishes to use me to facilitate that somehow - and perhaps not.
Perhaps. The problem is, we're pattern-recognising monkeys searching for a pattern in an enormous array of information. By the sheer statistics of it, we're guaranteed to find a sensible pattern, and then we say, "Aha! That's God's plan!". The problem is that correlation does not imply causation - just because we can join up the dots to form a giraffe, doesn't mean that was the intent all along.

So if God's plan can only be divined by lengthy study of countless variables and systems, then God's plan is unknowable - it gets lost in the avalanche of possible planes that leap out of the system.

(I don't think I have a point, I just like chaos theory)

I would say if this is mostly what you've encountered, that's because here you come across people who are more committed to their Faith than is representative of the general population. I find lots of people who believe because that's the way they were raised which gives rise to oddball statements like "I've been a Christian all my life," etc. Its wonderful when Church leadership like that gets saved! My current Pastor is in that category, and now has a real and living relationship with my Savior. He does a good job in his leadership role, too.
Very true, I forgot that one ("I believe because I was raised to"), and you're right, it's much more common a reason than the others.

If I might, allow me to add some pertinent info to your consideration of Sims 2:

the story never happened. Surely you know that's what the physical evidence suggests? So, what is the story about? Surely you realize it was never about teaching anyone to go fight, kill, or commit genocide? Now how about realizing that the whole thing refers to sin? Literally, the whole Exodus story. Not just this one plague you rightly find horribly, but Passover to the occupation of Canann. Amazing when you put a story into context, how the implications change.
Well, I'd say it's a little more than simply putting it into context. But yes, if the story never actually happened, then God didn't do anything wrong. But tell that to the literalists!

This issue is not thorny at all! My gut reaction is to respond with a smiling face and a Roman Catholic Priestly "bless you my Son." lol.

What you have right there is the basis of Faith. (We can develop that concept logically, if you wish) This logic is not specious at all, and may shed light on what I referred to above as bedrock that is empirical. You would likely come up with better verbiage for what I mean, once you understood it.
Maybe. Is it possible to come to God without personal revelation? Some Christians believe only those whom God has specifically called can become Christian.

Ah, so you were "born knowing how to sing 4 part harmony?" (Robin Williams joke) Allow me to point out it is entirely possibly for 2 people to sing the same hymn next to each other, and one is worshiping while the other is not.
Very true, and I didn't mean the singing of hymns to be a perfect litmus test of worship. The point is that, in a church full of hymn-singers, some of them are singing hymns as an act of worship. This thread is asking how one goes from "God exists" to "Let's go sing hymns, build temples, and otherwise worship him". Sure there may be some disingenuous people, but some of the hymn-singers and temple-builders are genuine?

I sincerely hope I get to inject some of this into tomorrow's worship service.
... Are you a priest?! ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Lots of reasons. Too many to list them all.

I value Him because He caused me to be. I love Him because He first loved me.




Humanity's deepest need is not to be delivered from the effects of poverty or the effects of cancer. Humanity's deepest need is deliverance from sin. For sin is why cancer and poverty exists in the first place. Sin is why a perfect creation has been spoiled and languishes in ever increasing decay.

Cancer and poverty are mere symptoms of a disease that exists within the heart of ever human being. Tomorrow world hunger could end and cancer be vanquished and men would still be walking around with the disease of sin within their hearts. They would still be hating one another. Men would still be selfish and self-seeking and unloving and greedy. So if one makes as their master, the pursuit of curing cancer and ending poverty, they are seeking to find a band-aid instead of a cure.

Why not have as one's master, The Only One who can cure this universal malady known as sin?
Once Jesus actually does cure cancer and end famine, I'll be first in line to convert.
 
Upvote 0
T

theophilus777

Guest
If you quote the Bible, I'll examine it on its own merits

That's all I ask for. Here's the most direct way I know of addressing the concept of what happens in the process of worship:

"As all of us reflect the Lord’s glory with faces that are not covered with veils, we are being changed into his image with ever-increasing glory. This comes from the Lord, who is the Spirit."

This is a translation touted by modern scholars as being one of 2 that are superlative, but I find this translation of 2 Corinthians 3:18 (God's Word) quite clunky. The KJV here is a bit vague on its own, so lets see it in a version so many love to hate, the MSG: (The Message)

"Whenever, though, they turn to face God as Moses did, God removes the veil and there they are—face-to-face! They suddenly recognize that God is a living, personal presence, not a piece of chiseled stone. And when God is personally present, a living Spirit, that old, constricting legislation is recognized as obsolete. We’re free of it! All of us! Nothing between us and God, our faces shining with the brightness of his face. And so we are transfigured much like the Messiah, our lives gradually becoming brighter and more beautiful as God enters our lives and we become like him."

Me likey! And on to the KJV:

"But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord."

Much more succinct. Your thoughts?

So 'worshipping' a 'false god' can, in some cases, be a good thing?

:) I would say no. That in the instance of doing the exact same thing as another may be found guilty by God of actually worshiping a false god, if it is a good thing its because as God sees it, he/she isn't really worshiping a false god, they're just doing a good thing. (In your example, pursuing science, presumably in some way that will benefit mankind)

So the emphasis here is on the fact we are in no position to condemn one another. In fact when God points out an idol in my life, He doesn't do it to condemn me but to set me free. So if He entrusts me with some similar info about someone else, I am responsible to not go condemning them over it.

Well, Jesus himself was quite heavy on the judgement and condemnation.

I know exactly why you say this but let me ask: did you see any single example of Him actually condemning anyone? Weren't these all hypothetical examples, designed to open our eyes so we don't get taken by surprise?

Those are actual questions and I do look forward to your answers, but something I state as a point is that is an example we are not to follow. He is the Judge, we are not. We become more like Him via worship, but never to the point of actually being God, and Just in our (condemning) Judgment of another. The closest we get to that in this life is to condemn our OWN sin - which means to stop doing it. That activity should keep us far too busy than to be able to "play god" at someone else.

I don't think they'd pay much attention to such a niche psychological thing as 'uppermost priorities' - IMO, they were concerned with actual worship of actual false deities.

You're referring to OT culture and perhaps even the OT writers, and I certainly agree with you here. I'm just pointing out the Living God I know deals with me personally on this level of uppermost priorities we may be blind to, and he also does this in the community of believers I participate in now. The main difference is we are now subtle, whereas back then it was bold and out in the open. What those false gods represented was plain as day, while now we are more prone to being fooled.

The problem is, we're pattern-recognising monkeys searching for a pattern in an enormous array of information.

I'll let the ideological difference slide in the effort to see your point ^_^

The key here is for the believer to NOT be searching for said pattern, as you put it. Viewing life as a Rorschach test is fraught with error. It also obstructs the voice of God. (However He may be inclined to reveal His will to us)

So if God's plan can only be divined by lengthy study of countless variables and systems, then God's plan is unknowable - it gets lost in the avalanche of possible planes that leap out of the system.

(I don't think I have a point, I just like chaos theory)

^_^ I rather like this, so I'm inclined to think that if I learned it, I might like that too. Here, I agree with you that if we take it upon ourselves to somehow "figure it all out," we are DOOMED. Further, I think we'd find ourselves a nervous wreck. A non-Christian but non-atheist friend observes that knowing everything must be a painful existence, to which I respond that the Cross states this, in quite a literal way we might be able to relate to.

As far as ever knowing God's will in any specific circumstance, Peace rules in that dep't. (Literally it is to act as an umpire in our heart, which requires our permission)

Well, I'd say it's a little more than simply putting it into context. But yes, if the story never actually happened, then God didn't do anything wrong. But tell that to the literalists!

The thought of that task makes me cringe ^_^

Anyway, I am not somehow attempting to task you with engaging these old stories on this level, but I do notice you have explored some of the OT. Levitical law is very relevatory once you escape the literal statements, but its still quite dry. The main Exodus story with the 10 plagues appeals to the teenage boy that likes to eat worms, so it might be a good starting point of asking "what's the real point here?" Which is that we all have a Pharoah within us, we all have the same choice of hardening our heart against God, and we can all be Judged if we do. That party the Hebrews had when the Egyptian army washed up on the shore dead? That is quite something in the Christian experience! And the same idea is repeated when David kills Goliath. It sux to have to fight the same battles whether they be addictions or just habits, but when when we rise above them and they can no longer fight back? :cool: Life gets better.

This is the allegorical level of all the OT: what does this story tell me about me? Or a simple re-phrase: what does this tell me about Christ? The latter of course being the more important question. Within the Christian experience these lines kinda blur, and we come up with: what does this story tell me about Christ in me? And that can in fact be a wonderful worship experience, and brings me full circle to the passage this post starts with.

Maybe. Is it possible to come to God without personal revelation? Some Christians believe only those whom God has specifically called can become Christian.

I need to be very careful with handling this question. Jesus warns me not to break a bruised reed, nor to quench a smoking flax. I think your statement here that I responded to may be personal revelation from God to you:

"It certainly raises a thorny issue - if person X believes because of personal revelation, and person Y doesn't believe because they lack personal revelation, then person Y's non-belief is entirely God's fault for not indwelling them with said revelation. So how can it be right that they should burn in Hell for eternity?"

You may not be interested in developing that into "bedrock," or even seeing how it could become such. I know I need personal revelation, and I see 2 passages that suggest to me its the only way it happens, but that does NOT become binding upon you! At any rate I firmly believe God calls EVERYONE. The Gospel simply does not compute any other way. He may not do all this all the time; i.e., some people may not be called yet. I can allow for the Universe to be big enough for that to be a possibility.

This thread is asking how one goes from "God exists" to "Let's go sing hymns, build temples, and otherwise worship him". Sure there may be some disingenuous people, but some of the hymn-singers and temple-builders are genuine?

I'd like to think that each denom, and even each local Church, has genuine folks in it. Going from "God exists," to let's build temples, has an interesting intermediate step in Genesis. You've read the book already, but if you look at the building of altars mentioned in Gen as the individuals in question wanting to cement their personal revelation of God that day not only for their own future, but for the society they lived in, you have the beginnings of "building Temples." And it becomes easier to see the false idol business I've been alluding to ...

... Are you a priest?! ^_^

No, but I do serve in the capacity of musician, as a worship leader. This is recognized as the front lines of battle, per God's design. So I do get substantial input to the rest of leadership.
 
Upvote 0

Jeremy E Walker

Well-Known Member
Feb 20, 2014
897
16
✟1,156.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Once Jesus actually does cure cancer and end famine, I'll be first in line to convert.

the curing of cancer and famine is the band-aid I spoke about.

Christ did something far more important when He offered Himself for our sins, the real issue at hand. The real issue is the disease, not the symptoms.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums