If your incapable of following the conversation you shouldn't respond. The poster I responded to said you should never be pressured to ignore your freedoms. The situation I described is one where expectation is that you would not exercise your freedom of speech right. So it is comparable.You actually see the "loss of freedom of speech" in being asked to wait an hour, and maybe move to a location better equiped for contrversial debating, so you don't disturb the rest of the group, and the distubing of the rest of the group to attempt to force a "performance" and a declaration in opposition to one's beliefs, along with the loss of freedom to speak freely, as morally and legally equivalent? Really?
(Godwin Alert!) I suppose you see no moral or legal difference between the Gestapo breaking down a door to carry away a Jewish family and a police officer politely asking a witness to a robbery for information about the perpetrator. (End Godwin Alert)
Upvote
0