Questions about origins of life timeline

TLK Valentine · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
Untold millions of people respect His word,

Good for them. Pointless, but good.

so you have an opinion. So called science also is opinion and belief. It doesn't do any good to present it as more than that.

In your opinion.

The bible has been fulfilled more than enough ways to allow and even force many to believe it has to be from God! Most of the prophesies are now history. No exaggeration.

Major exaggeration -- many of the prophecies were history even as they were written.

The folks He used to write His word did fine. The folks who write the ever shifting fables of so called science ought to be embarrassed, and quit.

Again, in your opinion.

bhsmte · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
They sure will be turning in their present state based ideas one day. Now you can make wild claims that this state will last for all time and the sun will burn out one day, or etc....but that is religion only. Not a tiny shred of proof.

I'll take this into consideration, when you show proof of a different state past.

Kylie · Apr 23, 2014

Dizredux said:
Heretic! Stone him! Stone him!

Dizredux

Very well.

*Sends SelfInflikted to Colorado.*

dad · Apr 23, 2014

TLK Valentine said:
Major exaggeration -- many of the prophecies were history even as they were written.

The empty echo of your unenlightened emasculation of history is evidence that the exegesis you extol cannot be entertained as anything but extreme expressions that oppose the eyewitnesses.

TLK Valentine · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
The empty echo of your unenlightened emasculation of history is evidence that the exegesis you extol cannot be entertained as anything but extreme expressions that oppose the eyewitnesses.

And who exactly are you trying to appear clever to?

HitchSlap · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
The empty echo of your unenlightened emasculation of history is evidence that the exegesis you extol cannot be entertained as anything but extreme expressions that oppose the eyewitnesses.

"Well, yeah, that's like, your opinion, man."

dad · Apr 23, 2014

HitchSlap said:
"Well, yeah, that's like, your opinion, man."

The claim was made that some sort of fraud was perpetrated by the writers of the bible. The charge was that the prophesies were written after the events. The accusation is unsustainable in the cases where it could even be considered as a possibility, and utterly refuted in most cases, where such a sinister and slanderous slur supersedes sane suppostion.

TLK Valentine · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
The claim was made that some sort of fraud was perpetrated by the writers of the bible. The charge was that the prophesies were written after the events. The accusation is unsustainable in the cases where it could even be considered as a possibility, and utterly refuted in most cases, where such a sinister and slanderous slur supersedes sane suppostion.

Still trying -- and failing -- to sound clever... for whom, I wonder?

Strathos · Apr 23, 2014

AV1611VET said:
But it was okay for you to make the point:

... wasn't it?

When I read your post, I was glad I had asked it.

Ain't no biggie though.

I'm well-used to putting up with you guys':

"It's a stupid point, unless we make it" attitude.

Except I never tried to use the existence of God and spirits as some kind of disproof that biological life originated with chemistry. I don't even see how that argument is supposed to logically work.

It's like if someone said that human bodies are made out of atoms, and you responded by saying that black holes aren't made out of atoms. True, but completely irrelevant.

HitchSlap · Apr 23, 2014

dad said:
The claim was made that some sort of fraud was perpetrated by the writers of the bible. The charge was that the prophesies were written after the events. The accusation is unsustainable in the cases where it could even be considered as a possibility, and utterly refuted in most cases, where such a sinister and slanderous slur supersedes sane suppostion.

That claim would be correct.

dad · Apr 23, 2014

HitchSlap said:
That claim would be correct.

Conspiracy theorist?

AV1611VET · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
Angels were created ex nihilo, before the elements.

No elements = no chemistry.

And for the record, I can make this even harder.

God, Who is self-existent, even predates the angels.

Strathos said:

God and angels are spirits. Spirits are not physical and have no chemistry.

AV1611VET said:

Ya.

I kinda figured that when I asked this:

Strathos said:

Then that was a pointless question.

AV1611VET said:

But it was okay for you to make the point:

... wasn't it?

When I read your post, I was glad I had asked it.

Ain't no biggie though.

I'm well-used to putting up with you guys':

"It's a stupid point, unless we make it" attitude.

Strathos said:

Except I never tried to use the existence of God and spirits as some kind of disproof that biological life originated with chemistry.

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

So you Arab phone "biological life" into this discussion to nullify my point?

Kylie · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
So you Arab phone "biological life" into this discussion to nullify my point?

Yeah, because no one was ever talking about biological life in this thread, were they?

TLK Valentine · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
So you Arab phone "biological life" into this discussion to nullify my point?

Reality already nullified your point.

AV1611VET · Apr 24, 2014

TLK Valentine said:
Reality already nullified your point.

Reality can take a hike.

TLK Valentine · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
Reality can take a hike.

You do realize that the questions asked in the OP refer to reality, right?

As it can now take a hike, you no longer have anything to contribute to the discussion.

AV1611VET · Apr 24, 2014

TLK Valentine said:
You do realize that the questions asked in the OP refer to reality, right?

As it can now take a hike, you no longer have anything to contribute to the discussion.

I think we're a ways from the OP now.

And I have to ask:

Have I ever "contributed to the discussion"?

TLK Valentine · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
I think we're a ways from the OP now.

And I have to ask:

Have I ever "contributed to the discussion"?

Only as comic relief and/or a cautionary tale for Christians.

Now, back to the OP....

AV1611VET · Apr 24, 2014

TLK Valentine said:
Now, back to the OP....

Uh-huh.

Now back to the OP.

Where's your contribution?

Sayre · Apr 24, 2014

AV1611VET said:
Have I ever "contributed to the discussion"?

Questions about origins of life timeline

I've already read the books you want burned.

Newbie

Defeater of Illogic

Undefeated!

I've already read the books you want burned.

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Undefeated!

I've already read the books you want burned.

No one important

PROUDLY PRIMATE

Undefeated!

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Defeater of Illogic

I've already read the books you want burned.

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

I've already read the books you want burned.

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

I've already read the books you want burned.

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Veteran

Similar threads