- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,850,664
- 51,417
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Except they would have to do it.That almost sounds scientific, slapping new names on things.
God isn't qualified.
Upvote
0
Except they would have to do it.That almost sounds scientific, slapping new names on things.
Except they would have to do it.
God isn't qualified.
One, this claim contradicts the first six words of Isaiah 24:18 ""And it shall come to pass"
Two: Isaiah 24:17 states that "Terror and pit and snare await you, people of the earth."
If the snare is the Flood from 1500 years earlier and is intended to catch "evols" then what are the terror and the pit and who are they intended to catch?
You keep having to change verse tenses to support your claim "is dissolved" in the verse becomes "was dissolved" in your argument.
"Evols" don't assume anything.
I would also think that if the world WAS "clean dissolved" in the Noachian Deluge, it would have been mentioned in the Genesis accounts.
That might be an argument if Isaiah 24 only spoke of a flood destroying the earth. However it also speaks of droughts (Isaiah 24:4) and fire (Isaiah 24:6).
And that is contradicted by Genesis 1:26-31 which states that Adam is made on the sixth day, two days AFTER the "first stars of our cosmos lit up".
How do you reconcile the two logically?
Which in no way means it is without error. In fact the presence of errors could be God's encouragement of critical thinking instead of unquestioning acceptance.
How many blind men did heal Jesus at Jericho? 1, 2, 3, or 4?
My theory What exactly do you mean by that Do you understand the scientific meaning of the word theoryAnything that has a supernatural cause would be un-falsifiable.
You're catching on to what we've been saying.
Just pick one event and test your theory:
1. Calming the storm Matthew 8:23-27; Mark 4:37-41; Luke 8:22-25
2. Feeding 5,000 - Matthew 14:14-21; Mark 6:30-44; Luke 9:10-17; John 6:1-14
3. Walking on water - Matthew 14:22-32; Mark 6:47-52; John 6:16-21
4. Feeding 4,000 Matthew 15:32-39; Mark 8:1-9
5. Fish with coin Matthew 17:24-27
6. Fig tree withers Matthew 21:18-22; Mark 11:12-14, 20-25
7. Huge catch of fish Luke 5:4-11; John 21:1-11
8. Water into wine John 2:1-11
Healing of Individuals
1. Man with leprosy Matthew 8:1-4; Mark 1:40-44; Luke 5:12-14
2. Roman centurions servant Matthew 8:5-13; Luke 7:1-10
3. Peters mother-in-law Matthew 8:14-15; Mark 1:30-31; Luke 4:38-39
4. Two men possessed with devils Matthew 8:28-34; Mark 5:1-15; Luke 8:27-39
5. Man with palsy Matthew 9:2-7; Mark 2:3-12; Luke 5:18-26
6. Woman with bleeding Matthew 9:20-22; Mark 5:25-34; Luke 8:43-48
7. Two blind men Matthew 9:27-31
Anything that has a supernatural cause would be un-falsifiable.
You're catching on to what we've been saying.
Just pick one event and test your theory:
1. Calming the storm Matthew 8:23-27; Mark 4:37-41; Luke 8:22-25
2. Feeding 5,000 - Matthew 14:14-21; Mark 6:30-44; Luke 9:10-17; John 6:1-14
3. Walking on water - Matthew 14:22-32; Mark 6:47-52; John 6:16-21
4. Feeding 4,000 Matthew 15:32-39; Mark 8:1-9
5. Fish with coin Matthew 17:24-27
6. Fig tree withers Matthew 21:18-22; Mark 11:12-14, 20-25
7. Huge catch of fish Luke 5:4-11; John 21:1-11
8. Water into wine John 2:1-11
Healing of Individuals
1. Man with leprosy Matthew 8:1-4; Mark 1:40-44; Luke 5:12-14
2. Roman centurions servant Matthew 8:5-13; Luke 7:1-10
3. Peters mother-in-law Matthew 8:14-15; Mark 1:30-31; Luke 4:38-39
4. Two men possessed with devils Matthew 8:28-34; Mark 5:1-15; Luke 8:27-39
5. Man with palsy Matthew 9:2-7; Mark 2:3-12; Luke 5:18-26
6. Woman with bleeding Matthew 9:20-22; Mark 5:25-34; Luke 8:43-48
7. Two blind men Matthew 9:27-31
Not exactly an impressive list for a someone who could, apparently, work genuine miracles whenever he wanted. I wonder what the creationist excuse for the list being so rubbish is.
He's saving the good ones for later.
1 Corinthians 2:9 But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
That is your theory. I would need to show any published works if I disagreed.
Helping Eve overcome ADAM: G-quadruplexes in the ADAM-15 promoter as new molecular targets for breast cancer therapeutics.
Genetic Adam and Eve did not live too far apart in time
Genetic Adam and Eve may have walked on Earth at the same time
New study places ancestor of all Y chromosomes much earlier than previous work.
ADAM AND EVE THEORY - by Miss Shamim Anwar
The Adam–God doctrine (or Adam–God theory)
I have found that this picture sums up most misconceptions quite nicely:
Mitochondrial Eve was just one of many of your ancestors that all lived at the same time. The same for Y-chromosome Adam.
What is interesting is in rare cases (no confirmed human cases, but it has been seen in other mammals from time to time) is when that whole system fudges up and offspring inherits their father's mitochondria.
As long as it isn't widespread it won't fudge up the overall genealogies. If the father's mitochondria is inherited it is no differen than inheriting the mtDNA from their paternal grandmother. One tiny switch in one family is not going to bring the whole human lineage house down.
Time has not ended yet.Dear Queller, It does come to pass at the end of time that he that cometh up out of the midst of the pit shall be taken in the SNARE.
I'm sorry, but I can find no Biblical commentary that agrees with you on this. Why is your interpretation better than others?Then the account identifies the SNARE as the Flood. Many teachers of Godless Evolutionism which have offended the little ones who believe in Jesus, will come up out of the pit or ground and be taken in the Snare of the Flood. Jesus tells us about their fate:
Mat 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in Me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
Terror and the pit await those who offend the little ones with the LIES of Godless Evolutionism. The first Humans came to this Planet in an Ark, and falsely teaching little ones that that is UnTrue and teaching the False Assumptions of Godless men instead, will not go unrewarded. Terror and the pit, awaits those who teach Evol Lies to innocent children.Humans came to our Planet from Adam's world which was "clean dissolved" in the waters of the Flood.
That's because Isaiah 24 is comparing the destruction of the world to come to the destruction of the destruction of the Flood.That's because it's written in Hebrew perfect tense, which means the action has already been completed. IOW, it's in the past.
Stem: Hithpoel
Aspect: Perfect
* The Hithpoel Perfect verb form occurs 2 times in the Old Testament.
Definition of "Perfect"
The Perfect expresses a completed action.
You are confusing the tenses of English with the tenses of the Hebrews.
"Evols" do not assume this. They conclude it from mountains of evidence, most of it genetic.We did NOT evolve from the common ancestor of Apes as the ToE falsely assumes. Evols have forced their False assumptions upon our children for more than 50 years now.
You and dad should discuss this. He thinks this world was in a different state in the past where all physical laws were different and you think this entire world has existed for only 4500 years.Sure they do. They observe the Facts which point to Evolism and then they Falsely ASSUME their Theory. That's what a scientific Theory is. It's an educated assumption based on facts which leads to their assumption. The problem with the ToE is that it is based on InComplete data since the scientists have rejected God's Truth which shows that Humans were made on another world.
Completely unsupported imaginings.Many believe the Bible should be written in other ways, but God doesn't agree. Here's the way God is:
Pro 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.BTW, this could not be referring to events yet to come since God promised Noah that NEVER again would a Flood destroy the Earth. Gen 9:11 Our Earth is NOT the one which was clean dissolved in the Flood because it's a Rock, and water covers it but doesn't dissolve it. It's just another difference between Adam's earth and the present earth. God Bless you.You must believe that each chapter of Scripture speaks of the same thing throughout the entire chapter. It's not so, since God conceals His Truth from Unbelievers. This is clear when you read the PROPHECY of Genesis 1:28-31. This prophecy will NOT be fulfilled until AFTER Jesus returns to the Earth at the end of time. Isaiah 11 tells of the fulfillment of the prophecy at the end of the present 6th Day. God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman
So then what is the image of God that Adam was made to look like in Genesis 1 if not his soul? And why is this making of the physical body on day 3 not mentioned in Genesis 1? Wouldn't not mentioning it on day 3 mean that God did not consider the body good?Originally Posted by Aman777Dear mzungu, False. Adam was made the 3rd Day Gen 2:4-7 BEFORE the Stars were made on the 4th Day. Gen 1:16 This gives us a good date to start from since it was some 13.7 billion years ago, in man's time, when the first stars of our Cosmos lit up.Dear Queller, Genesis 2:4-7 tells us that man was "FORMED" on the 3rd Day after the Earth was made Genesis 1:9-10 but BEFORE the plants which grew on the 3rd Day. Genesis 1:12
This is the account of when YHWH/Jesus made Adam a living soul, physically, from the dust of the ground.
Genesis 1:27 and Genesis 5:1-2 show that Adam and Eve were both "created in God's Image" on the 6th Day. It takes the AGREEMENT of the Trinity to Create a New Christian, Spiritually, Eternally. Genesis 1:26 and John 14:16.
This is also confirmed by this verse from the New Testament:
1Cr 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
God Bless you.
In Love,
Aman