The Big Bang (Hypothesis) vs. Creationism

xXChristPeripheralXx

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2013
1,031
19
✟1,337.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
You described someone that was exhibiting altruistic behaviour as absolutely wrong, while emphasizing the power of altruism.

Nevermind, he was a nobody anyway.

:doh:


Couldnt she just have organized everyone to boycott the buses without getting arrested?

Like instead of getting hemmed up by the cops, she could have went to her seat, went home, and organized a boycott.

Same end result.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
What egyptian records are you talking about?

Do you read Hieroglyphics and you have studied them or something?

No, but many other people have spent their whole lives studying ancient Egypt, and they have found not a single shred of evidence for it.

You guys are claiming that a race of people "made up" the story about being slaves?

How does that makes sense, no one in History has ever lied about being enslaved as a nation..

Oh, people make up all sorts of things to make their particular group feel victimized. Look at how some Christians go on about the alleged "war on Christmas", getting all offended when someone says, "Happy Holidays" to them.

You guys dont make any sense with this stuff...

Like claiming something as absolute fact without being able to produce any real world evidence?
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
No, but many other people have spent their whole lives studying ancient Egypt, and they have found not a single shred of evidence for it.

You guys are claiming that a race of people "made up" the story about being slaves?



Oh, people make up all sorts of things to make their particular group feel victimized. Look at how some Christians go on about the alleged "war on Christmas", getting all offended when someone says, "Happy Holidays" to them.



Like claiming something as absolute fact without being able to produce any real world evidence?

Like claiming there is no God and convincing yourself it is true because you believe it avoids your guilt and accountability before a holy God.
 
Upvote 0

xXChristPeripheralXx

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2013
1,031
19
✟1,337.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
No, but many other people have spent their whole lives studying ancient Egypt, and they have found not a single shred of evidence for it.

You guys are claiming that a race of people "made up" the story about being slaves?



Oh, people make up all sorts of things to make their particular group feel victimized. Look at how some Christians go on about the alleged "war on Christmas", getting all offended when someone says, "Happy Holidays" to them.



Like claiming something as absolute fact without being able to produce any real world evidence?


True Christians dont care about Christmas.

Jesus wasnt really born on December 25th, so Im not sure what you are talking about.

And just to set the record straight, you havent studied anything that has to do with Egyptian "historical" records, you just claim that someone else did?

Do you review something before you argue for it?
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Like claiming there is no God and convincing yourself it is true because you believe it avoids your guilt and accountability before a holy God.

What? Where do you think you can just start making statements like this as to why I am an atheist. I am an atheist because I see no evidence for God. I am not trying to avoid any accountability.

Now, if you have something to say to address the issue, will you say it? What you are doing here is very poor debate form.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
True Christians dont care about Christmas.

Jesus wasnt really born on December 25th, so Im not sure what you are talking about.

Google is your friend.

And just to set the record straight, you havent studied anything that has to do with Egyptian "historical" records, you just claim that someone else did?

Do you review something before you argue for it?

I notice that you do not actually address the issue. All you do is claim that my point is invalid because I haven't personally studied it myself.

But, feel free to prove me wrong. Show me any real world source that shows that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt and that they were led out of Egypt by Moses after Egypt suffered plagues, and that the Egyptian pharaoh was killed crossing the Red sea and the Israelites then spent 40 years wandering in the desert. Because I'm willing to actually look at the evidence. All you gotta do is provide it.
 
Upvote 0

xXChristPeripheralXx

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2013
1,031
19
✟1,337.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Google is your friend.



I notice that you do not actually address the issue. All you do is claim that my point is invalid because I haven't personally studied it myself.

But, feel free to prove me wrong. Show me any real world source that shows that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt and that they were led out of Egypt by Moses after Egypt suffered plagues, and that the Egyptian pharaoh was killed crossing the Red sea and the Israelites then spent 40 years wandering in the desert. Because I'm willing to actually look at the evidence. All you gotta do is provide it.

Christ was not born on December 25.

It doesnt exist in any Bible known to man.

(Im a Christian, I would know)


The only historical account I have of jews in egypt are scriptural, which is more than you have against the proposal, I can assure you..



You guys should quit using google for everything and actually reference your claims..
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The only historical account I have of jews in egypt are scriptural, which is more than you have against the proposal, I can assure you..

I have the real world which says otherwise. Which is a better account of the real world, the Bible or the real world?
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Google is your friend.



I notice that you do not actually address the issue. All you do is claim that my point is invalid because I haven't personally studied it myself.

But, feel free to prove me wrong. Show me any real world source that shows that the Israelites were slaves in Egypt and that they were led out of Egypt by Moses after Egypt suffered plagues, and that the Egyptian pharaoh was killed crossing the Red sea and the Israelites then spent 40 years wandering in the desert. Because I'm willing to actually look at the evidence. All you gotta do is provide it.

Searching for Moses - Answers in Genesis
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Ah yes. Answers in Genesis. And when they real world evidence doesn't support their views their response is to change the real world in order to fit those views.

You got an UNBIASED source that agrees with their conclusion?

Care to respond to the points made in the article. I'm not buying your attack on the source. It only demonstrates you have nothing to offer to the discussion.
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I will not consider anything from a source that ADMITS that they are biased. They openly state that they proceed from the assumption that the Bible is literally true. This means that they have chosen their conclusion before looking at the evidence, and this is no way to conduct research. This is not evidence, it is what they have cherry picked and twisted to support the view that they have decided is right.

Now, I'll ask again. Given me VALID evidence from the REAL WORLD to support your claims.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I will not consider anything from a source that ADMITS that they are biased. They openly state that they proceed from the assumption that the Bible is literally true. This means that they have chosen their conclusion before looking at the evidence, and this is no way to conduct research. This is not evidence, it is what they have cherry picked and twisted to support the view that they have decided is right.

Now, I'll ask again. Given me VALID evidence from the REAL WORLD to support your claims.

Are you suggesting you are without bias or your sources are without bias, an atheist coming into a Christian forum to debate about something which you don't believe exists, to what end?
 
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Are you suggesting you are without bias or your sources are without bias, an atheist coming into a Christian forum to debate about something which you don't believe exists, to what end?

Is this the argument you are using? That my sources are just as biased as yours?

If you think a valid scientific source is equally as biased as AiG, then you are sorely mistaken.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Is this the argument you are using? That my sources are just as biased as yours?

If you think a valid scientific source is equally as biased as AiG, then you are sorely mistaken.

AIG uses valid scientific sources and references their articles and yes, scientists are susceptible to bias, especially the bias of the ones funding their work, which in many cases is the government.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
14,677
5,239
✟301,883.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
AIG uses valid scientific sources and references their articles

They just misrepresent them and/or draw false conclusions that the evidence doesn't actually support.

and yes, scientists are susceptible to bias, especially the bias of the ones funding their work, which in many cases is the government.

Peer review removes bias by letting everyone see their method. Any bias introduced by one person will be found by others.
 
Upvote 0

ThinkForYourself

Well-Known Member
Nov 8, 2013
1,785
49
✟2,284.00
Faith
Atheist
AIG uses valid scientific sources and references their articles and yes, scientists are susceptible to bias, especially the bias of the ones funding their work, which in many cases is the government.

Scientists can be biased, but peer review tends to remove bias because others can follow the same methodology.

As opposed to religious sites, which tend to go with the bible being the ultimate source of truth, regardless of what the evidence supports.
 
Upvote 0

epluribus36

Follower of Jesus
Nov 1, 2013
194
9
Ozarks
✟15,402.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
So what is God and how does God make a universe?

Great questions. I don't know the answers, but I believe He sent His Son to die for all of our sins, to wash us clean and make us worthy of His Kingdom of Heaven.

What does the Bible say God says He is? I AM. That's good enough for me.

As far as how He made the universe; why do you want to know? What would you do with that information, if you possessed it?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
AIG uses valid scientific sources and references their articles and yes, scientists are susceptible to bias, especially the bias of the ones funding their work, which in many cases is the government.

"By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record."--Answers in Genesis, Statement of Faith

The AiG Statement of Faith - Answers in Genesis

Find a single scientific source that requires the same statement of faith for any theory.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums