I'd say that's incorrect, in that faith and science use two different canons of proof, one is testable, the other is not, and you don't need one to corroborate the other. Religion uses faith. Science uses hypothetical testing of phenomena. I don't have to believe in God to test whether a bowling ball and a feather accelerate identically in a vacuum. I don't have to use quantum theory to believe in God.
Science is based on the same foundations as philosophy - it only works if you take, on faith, particular unprovable metaphysical propositions.
You also have to be very careful not to make distinctions that are not accurate about how people believe in God or in any particular scientific idea.
Many people believe in god for what might be called personal reasons, but many others believe in god for reasons of metaphysical necessity and philosophical coherence. Some people with a scientific bent even believe in god because their scientific ideas lead them to those particular mataphysical conclusions.
By the same token, many people believe in scientific ideas because they see a logical argument for them or evidence of them. On the other hand, many believe scientidic explantions purely for personal reasons - on faith, or because they trust someone who says it is so. How many people have looked at all the mathematical data or models that physicists use to draw their conclusions? Even someone well versed in the evidence for evolution may be largely accepting a scientists explanation of how it must fit together as a matter of trust. And a person can believe totally that gravity exists, while rejecting the idea of relativity or any other particular description of how it works - just as with belief in god.
Ever poured a thousand marbles into a clear plastic box? Looks pretty ordered to me. Of course, order is an arbitrary human concept we use to process what happens in the universe. Like whether a star is a pulsar or a black hole, or how many six-packs I can shotgun in an hour. Order. It is what we make it. Literally.
Well, yes, marbles poured into a box are ordered, that is rather the point, isn't it? In a fundamentally ordered universe, that is what we would expect. I am not clear on why you think that contradicts the idea of an ordered universe.
The idea that all order comes from our perception is interesting, and leads to some interesting conclusions - but not ones that I would have expected from someone who seems to really like science. But maybe I am wong on that? In any case, even if we impose order on things which are truly disordered (would that be even possible?), it means that WE are ordered, which means there is order.