BBC Biased?

HonestTruth

Member
Jul 4, 2013
4,852
1,525
Reaganomics: TOTAL FAIL
✟9,787.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Looks like nothing more than a small and insignificant oversight unlike the biased Fox network.

One really good thing about BBC was when they posed questions to Bush during his war on Iraq. They posed questions that the biased right wing American media refused to pose. Too bad Tony Benn wasn't allowed in the White House to pose questions or Bush would have been torn to pieces on that podium.
 
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
475
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟63,625.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Looks like nothing more than a small and insignificant oversight
Not providing facts or evidence to back up your arguments is not small nor insignificant, it undermines your entire argument. Thankfully we hold the BBC to higher standards than that.
...unlike the biased Fox network.
Who cares? Was anyone talking about Fox?
 
Upvote 0

theFijian

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 30, 2003
8,898
475
West of Scotland
Visit site
✟63,625.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
What I find troubling is that after an article appeared in the Mail over bias in the BBC, there were comments calling for the BBC to be scrapped. There seems to be so much right wing propaganda at the moment.

Don't read the Daily Mail. Problem solved.
 
Upvote 0

non-religious

Veteran
Mar 4, 2005
2,500
163
50
Herts
✟11,017.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
[hippo]What I find troubling is that after an article appeared in the Mail over bias in the BBC, there were comments calling for the BBC to be scrapped. There seems to be so much right wing propaganda at the moment.

I think a lot of people have some very legitimate gripes about the BBC. The licence fee, the way in which the whole sordid Savile affair was handled, perceived ageism etc...

I'm a huge fan of Radio4, but there are times when, particularly on some of the other BBC radio stations, their impartial, unbiased and constant sitting on the fence seems almost frustrating. I like to hear what the presenters actually think about specific issues. James O'brien (LBC) is a classic example of a presenter who is open about his political ideology and that, in my opinion, makes the show/format more appealing. You can do both without appearing overly bias or partisan.

At least with FOX we clearly can see just how odious they are. Both their reporting and their personalities leave nothing to the imagination. I appreciate that transparency (although perhaps in not such large doses, and preferably not so rancid). The BBC shouldn't shy away from being more opinionated.
 
Upvote 0

louise sheinholtz

Active Member
May 23, 2013
353
21
✟601.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Not providing facts or evidence to back up your arguments is not small nor insignificant, it undermines your entire argument. Thankfully we hold the BBC to higher standards than that.
Who cares? Was anyone talking about Fox?

I like the Christian Englishman they are like a breath of fresh air compared to the US Christians.
What's wrong with Fox anyway?. No democrats there who are blind as a bat. My husband was from England.
Louise
 
Upvote 0

Robban

-----------
Site Supporter
Dec 27, 2009
11,316
3,058
✟650,991.00
Country
Sweden
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Divorced
I like the Christian Englishman they are like a breath of fresh air compared to the US Christians.
What's wrong with Fox anyway?. No democrats there who are blind as a bat. My husband was from England.
Louise

Our dear Fijian is from Scotland.
Did ye not noooooo?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Nige55

Newbie
Mar 2, 2012
801
222
✟68,732.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The BBC may well be biased (as long as any media outlet is under the control of man, I suspect it will always be biased, or better, influenced in one way or another). They may also be misinformed / mislead at times ( language can often be at the crux of this, I've been witness to many lost-in-translation examples at times, not specifically referring to the BBC here). I did however witness one clear example of the BBC that was seriously misleading, well, false to be exact. We should always reference and dig deeper than one source if we would want to claim that we are well informed.
 
Upvote 0