This has been discussed on multiple occasions. He was not acting in a Neighborhood Watch capacity. He was also on his way home.
What a load of shiitake mushrooms!
He was always on duty!
Upvote
0
This has been discussed on multiple occasions. He was not acting in a Neighborhood Watch capacity. He was also on his way home.
What a load of shiitake mushrooms!
He was always on duty!
You need to give people time to post before tossing out posts. You did this before, and I suspect you edited your post after you saw what happened.Nope, just didn't know if you'd seen my post.
The minute he started following Martin and called 911 was the moment he went on duty. You cannot brush this to the side.Even police aren't always on duty. Neither are Neighborhood Watch.
You need to give people time to post before tossing out posts. You did this before, and I suspect you edited your post after you saw what happened.
I never said any such thing. Please go back and reread what I posted without using your emotions. I will accept your apology.I'm denying that you have any business telling people who can and can't answer you on a public forum.
.
The minute he started following Martin and called 911 was the moment he went on duty. You cannot brush this to the side.
No, it wasn't. He was acting as a normal citizen. By your logic, if a police officer who is off duty, sees a crime in progress, he's suddenly on duty. That isn't how if works. Much like say Joe Smith is a garbage man, and while off duty, picks up litter on the side of the road. Is he suddenly "on duty"? Of course not.
The logic in your post is quite flawed.
No, Zimmerman was the official neighborhood watch as recognized by the homeowners association. It was his job, and he was proud to do it. I am surprised you are claiming he was not performing the duty of neighborhood watch? That is very puzzling.
Not to mention smearing the dead as if he was a good for nothing loser who would have ended up in jail if he had not been killed.
He was on his way home from the store. He was not acting in a neighborhood watch capacity. By your thinking, anyone who calls the police for something suspicious is now a part of a neighborhood watch. When you punch out of work and go home, are you still at work? No, same thing applies here.
Martin's dead and it was Zimmerman who shot him in the heart at point blank range - the jury can come to their own conclusions as to what were his intensions..The prosecution stated that Zimmerman said he killed a guy but, the testimony said he said he shot someone. The defense should have objected but, it will come up in the defense's closing arguement. I think they choose not to object because they are setting the prosecution up, giving them just enough rope to hang themselves. Also the jury seems to have been taking good notes and they are all over it.
Martin's dead and it was Zimmerman who shot him in the heart at point blank range - the jury can come to their own conclusions as to what were his intensions..
As for acting or not acting as a Neighborhood Watch Captain, the police dispatcher told him to remain in his car and not follow the suspect - and if he had not deliberately ignored her comments, none of this would have happened.
Every move that Zimmerman made that night was perfectly legal. We can't say the same for MartinZimmerman is the only adult involved in the case and it was he who made the decision to carry a gun and get out of his car to follow Martin - both in direct violation of the guidelines set down by the Neighborhood Watch Program.
Zimmerman decided to follow Martin - ignoring the instructions given by the police dispatcher.
Zimmerman's deliberate actions to follow an innocent boy, on his way home after buying Skittles and ice tea, set the stage for this tragedy.
It was Zimmerman took the life of an innocent boy.
When a prosecutor says the defendant said something, and the defendant never said it, he's a liar. And in this case, the prosecutor is a serial liarThanks for that. Not even that link comes out and says the prosecution lies. At least somebody has enough sense to not flat out call the prosecutor a liar.
Of course even that link does not provide the actual transcript.
First, you say he was always on duty. Then you say he WENT ON DUTY when he called 911. So you proved yourself wrong, and this after you said I had no credibility even though my point was factual and has been provenThe minute he started following Martin and called 911 was the moment he went on duty. You cannot brush this to the side.