5 Sneaky Ways Fundamentalists Are Trying To Slip Christian Creationism Into Americas
- Thread starter BarryDesborough
- Start date
FrenchyBearpaw
Take time for granite.
Allegedly. Since scholars don't know who actually wrote G1 or G2 (all scholars agree these were two different authors), you really can't say if it's a god or not.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,046
- 51,497
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Would these be the same scholars that give the nod to the Jesus Seminar?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,046
- 51,497
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Well, I don't trust your scholars anyway; especially if you guys cite them as authoritative.
Upvote
0
TheBear
NON-WOKED
Wait. What???
You mean it wasn't creation science scientists who exposed Piltdown Man as fraud? You mean it was those evil, atheistic scientists who exposed it as a fraud? They must be up to something. How else can you explain what they did?
(It boggles the mind, sometimes, doesn't it?
)
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,046
- 51,497
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
Since it is all but impossible to find one that even understands the theory of evolution that is very dubious.
Upvote
0
TheBear
NON-WOKED
Wait. What???
You mean it wasn't creation science scientists who exposed Piltdown Man as fraud? You mean it was those evil, atheistic scientists who exposed it as a fraud? They must be up to something. How else can you explain what they did?
(It boggles the mind, sometimes, doesn't it?
I'm sure one would have eventually.
Interesting. Kind of like the "One day you'll see! Keep looking!" I love it!
Well, maybe that's not it, either. Perhaps they are behind the times on modern scientific advances. And, just so we're not splitting hairs, I'm not talking a decade or a few. I'm talking about hundreds of years.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,046
- 51,497
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
A G1 creationist would not have called it an ape in the first place.
Upvote
0
TLK Valentine
I've already read the books you want burned.
- Apr 15, 2012
- 64,493
- 30,319
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Single
A G1 creationist wouldn't call an ape an ape in the first place -- they would lump it with chimps and monkeys into one "kind."
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
FrenchyBearpaw
Take time for granite.
Since "creation" and "scientist" are mutually exclusive terms, this is unlikely.
Upvote
0
TheBear
NON-WOKED
Unless, of course, their methodology is without error and the final word on things. Done, son! End of discussion! No further research or studies are needed.
IOW - The "God did it" response, doesn't answer any detailed questions about the nature of the 'creations'. Such responses would be ruled "non-responsive" in a court of law, as well.
Upvote
0
FrenchyBearpaw
Take time for granite.
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God? - Epicurus
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Similar threads
