Look at what Jesus says to the disciples:
John 15:4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me.
Jesus tells the disciples to abide in Him, even though they are already in Him.
Well, I just don't see it that way, I'm afraid. The disciples could not have been "in Christ" the way post-Calvary believers are. It was only by the shed blood of Christ that being "in Christ" was made possible; and that hadn't happened at the time Jesus was speaking of the vine and branches. So, it seems to me here that Christ is teaching the disciples a soon-to-be truth, which is that they must - as all other believers must - come to abide in the Vine, who is Christ.
We are in Christ when we are saved; that is the point. They're already saved; Jesus declares them to be clean in verse 3.
I agree we are in Christ when we are saved. You'll have to explain, though, how the disciples can already be saved, in the Gospel sense of the word,
before Jesus died on the cross for their sins.
Jesus declares them to be clean by the word which he spoke unto them but I don't think this means they were born-again. From what I understand from Scripture, God's Word generally has a cleansing effect upon the mind of the one who reads or hears it. But this cleansing effect is not tantamount to salvation.
It is one thing to be in Christ because of salvation, it is another to abide in Him as Jesus told His disciples.
I think the distinction being made may not be between just being saved and living in intimate fellowship with Christ, but between existing as a created being dependent upon the Creator (a branch in the vine) and existing as a born-again child of God who is "in Christ" (a branch abiding in the vine that bears fruit).
Therefore, John 15:6 is saying the same thing..one who is not abiding in Him will be cast out as a branch, and withered.
This is all predicated on the idea that people were saved before the way of salvation had been made. I am very curious to hear how you think this is possible.
They couldn't be a branch unless they were a Christian
They could if being a branch simply meant existing by the sustaining power of the Creator who is Jesus, which is the condition for
every person, saved or not.
You need to read a little further down Ezekiel 15:
Oh, I have. All the way to end of the chapter.
Ezekiel 15:6 Therefore thus says the Lord GOD: Like the wood of the vine among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so have I given up the inhabitants of Jerusalem.
Ezekiel 15:7 And I will set my face against them. Though they escape from the fire, the fire shall yet consume them, and you will know that I am the LORD, when I set my face against them.
Ezekiel 15:8 And I will make the land desolate, because they have acted faithlessly, declares the Lord GOD."
Do you not see that this chapter supports my interpretation entirely?
No, I don't. I explained why to a degree already.
In verses 1 through 5 the Lord is telling the Jews that without fruit born from their relationship with Him, they had no use. That the wood of the vine branches isn't useful for anything on its own, and how much less when they are burned to a cinder.
Yes, this is more or less what I already pointed out in my last post.
In verses 6-8 He tells them that because of their backsliding they will be cast out and burned up. That's exactly what Jesus says in John 15.
I'm sorry, but in
Ezekiel 15:6-8 the prophet isn't speaking of eternal punishment in hell, nor of the Israelites being disowned by God. In the commentaries I've examined, "fire" simply refers to calamity. In this part of the chapter, then, the parallel to what you are contending for in
John 15 doesn't appear to exist.
Revelation 3:14 "And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: 'The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God's creation.
Revelation 3:15 "'I know your works: you are neither cold nor hot. Would that you were either cold or hot!
Revelation 3:16 So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will spit you out of my mouth.
Revelation 3:17 For you say, I am rich, I have prospered, and I need nothing, not realizing that you are wretched, pitiable, poor, blind, and naked.
Much backsliding and ignorance of Christians is detailed in the epistles and in the rest of the Lords letters, so according to scripture it is entirely possible for Christians to be ignorant of the Lords will.
But this isn't what this passage in the Revelation that you've cited is talking about. As a church the Laodiceans knew the will of God, but the affluence in which they existed had blunted their sense of dependence upon Him. Unfortunately, the Laodiceans did not recognize that they had become so blunted. This passage, then, is not speaking to a lack of knowledge concerning the will of God, but of a lack of clarity about the state of one's heart toward God.
I talk to Christians all the time who do not know His will. This is why Paul lamented that he still had to feed some with milk.
This is rather off the mark concerning my point about the ignorant servant.
Some ignorance concerning the will of God, the deeper truths of His Word, is not the same as having
no knowledge at all of God's will, which is what is said of the ignorant servant in
Luke 12:48. As I pointed out, even a brand-new believer who has heard the Gospel has, in hearing it, received at least a basic, general knowledge of God's will.
If he always was a hypocrite he wouldn't need to be appointed a place with the other hypocrites, because he would already be going there in the first place. Why would there be a change in status?
I don't see in the parable that a change of status has occurred or has even been implied as having occurred.
What the text says is that he was stripped of his status as a servant and booted out of the kingdom and placed with the unbelievers.
I'm afraid you're guilty of some eisegesis here.
If he was never saved he wouldn't be serving in the masters house in the first place.
There are many "tares among the wheat" who serve God right along with genuine believers. They just do so from corrupt motives, oblivious often to their "tare" status.
Also note that Jesus called believers hypocrites in Luke 6:42
How can you say to your brother, 'Brother, let me take out the speck that is in your eye,' when you yourself do not see the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take out the speck that is in your brother's eye.
Hmmm...I'm not so sure that Jesus is speaking solely to believers in this passage. Again, Christian believers did not exist yet at the time Jesus spoke these words. And the immediate context of the passage indicates that Jesus was speaking before a large audience (
Lu. 6:19; 7:1) His words concerning judging another could easily apply to the crowd as to his disciples, and I expect that this was exactly what Christ intended his words to do. I don't think, therefore, that this passage is good grounds for what you're suggesting.
Hey, then we finally agree on something!
I'm sure we agree on many things brother. God bless.
I expect you are quite right. God bless you, too.
Selah.