ChristOurCaptain
Augsburgian Catholic
The only thing that made sense out of all
I don't think I'm able to dumb it down more than I already did.
Upvote
0
The only thing that made sense out of all
Martin's background matters in two scenarios and only two scenarios, that I can think of. The first is if the prosecution tries to paint Martin as an innocent child in an attempt to bias the jury. At this point the judges stay on evidence of his background will most likely be lifted, as the prosecution opened the door. The second only applies to his history of fighting. Martin's history of fighting can be used to show that he had the experience and strength to cause Zimmerman to fear his prowess enough to shoot on him. In this way it would be used in the same manner as the fact that a man has a black belt when they are shot for assaulting someone. It shows a level of competence above the average person, and can be used to show that a size disparity did not enter into the conflict.
What I've been saying the entire time.
I don't think I'm able to dumb it down more than I already did.
Just as I feared. The Low Information Liberal Voter needs things explain in the simplist of terms. However, only some issues are relevant.
Go easy on yourself, Veritas -- he tried to explain it to you as simply as he could.
George Zimmerman Wants To Testify At Trayvon Martin Murder Trial | Radar Online
In an unusual turn, Zimmerman wants to testify on his own behalf.
George maintains it was absolutely self-defense. Normally, criminal defense attorneys dont want to put their client on the stand, but in this case, Mark OMara (Georges attorney) feels so strongly in the evidence, and in his innocence, he would be inclined to allow him to testify."
So how do I respond to your flame without flaming?
It appears there is a video shot by Martin of his friends beating an innocent, defenseless homeless man. Sounds like he did engage in predatory violent behaviorOk, so -- did Treyvon Martin engage in predatory violent behavior, or was it just an image?
Seems to me that the violent predator was the man who chased him down and shot him.
What flame? I was trying to keep you from being discouraged.
Some of the legal issues here are more complicated than others -- nobody (but yourself) is blaming you for not picking up on every last one.
Just as I feared. The Low Information Liberal Voter needs things explain in the simplist of terms. However, only some issues are relevant.
Was I just called a liberal?
You do of course realize that a defendant testifying at his own trial is the judicial equivilant of a hail mary pass, right? The reason that it rarely happens is that usually when they do it really just ends of weaking the defense's case on cross-examination. When they do testify it usually mean the defense knows that it's case it very weak and that tesfifying can't make things any worse and it has a chance of making things better.George Zimmerman Wants To Testify At Trayvon Martin Murder Trial | Radar Online
In an unusual turn, Zimmerman wants to testify on his own behalf.
George maintains it was absolutely self-defense. Normally, criminal defense attorneys dont want to put their client on the stand, but in this case, Mark OMara (Georges attorney) feels so strongly in the evidence, and in his innocence, he would be inclined to allow him to testify."
Let's not forget that there is a witness who saw Zimmerman on the ground getting beat up
So you compound the flame. Good luck with that.
The Zimmerman defense could be taught in law schools as an example of what tactics a desperate defense employs.Well then, all that witness has to do is testify about who started the fight. Assuming, of course, the witness actually witnessed that.
Martin started it? Zimmerman walks.
Zimmerman started it? He goes to jail.
I suspect if this witness saw anything useful to the defense, they wouldn't be so desperate to paint Martin as a thug.
So, getting out of a car is reason enough to attack someone?
If you were walking around on your own and a larger man got out of his car and came at you, what would you do?