Does anyone know the true reason why they don't allow any other people or priests too than those there to see the miracle of the light that happens every year, while they allow anyone to touch the holy flame?
Ah, I vaguely remember that book. I read that way back around 2000 or 2001.I think that ArmyMatt understands my question more, I mean why do they allow to transfer the flame for the people, and they do not allow anyone to be present when the miracle happens every year inside the tomb?
And if I go further, why don't they put a camera there for the world?
An archimandrite hid in the holy tomb once and he wrote a book about it I SAW THE HOLY LIGHT
I think that ArmyMatt understands my question more, I mean why do they allow to transfer the flame for the people, and they do not allow anyone to be present when the miracle happens every year inside the tomb?
And if I go further, why don't they put a camera there for the world?
An archimandrite hid in the holy tomb once and he wrote a book about it I SAW THE HOLY LIGHT
not everything is for everyone's eyes
As Matt explained, the Patriarch is the archbishop of Jerusalem, so it is his duty to celebrate the ceremony and retrieve the fire.
I would imagine that not everything is for everyone's eyes.
Who knows someday a camera may indeed be placed in the tomb.
Also this miracle is not for healing, its more about the theology of light and fire.
There is simply no way for humans to successfully pull off a scam for a thousand years. That is more improbable than any miracle, even a Virgin birth.
.Not at all, replied the priest calmly; its not the supernatural part I doubt. Its the natural part. Im exactly in the position of the man who said, I can believe the impossible, but not the improbable.
Thats what you call a paradox, isnt it? asked the other.
Its what I call common sense, properly understood, replied Father Brown. It really is more natural to believe a preternatural story, that deals with things we dont understand, than a natural story that contradicts things we do understand. Tell me that the great Mr Gladstone, in his last hours, was haunted by the ghost of Parnell, and I will be agnostic about it. But tell me that Mr Gladstone, when first presented to Queen Victoria, wore his hat in her drawing-room and slapped her on the back and offered her a cigar, and I am not agnostic at all. That is not impossible; its only incredible. But Im much more certain it didnt happen than that Parnells ghost didnt appear; because it violates the laws of the world I do understand. So it is with that tale of the curse. It isnt the legend that I disbelieve its the history