Doctrines of Jesus or [RC] 'Mary', one or the other, but not both, take your pick...

I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
There is a couple things here. 1st it wasn't until Jesus through his death and resurrection that the gates of heaven were opened, thus even the righteous after death went somewhere else than heavn until Jesus descended to them and preached to them and released them from their captivity.

The other point here is if people are in this suspended animation that you are talking about then how was Jesus able to preach to them?

Also something else that comes to mind is why did Jesus tell the thief upon the cross that this day he would be with Jesus in paradise?
The first paragraph is not scripturally accurate and therefore not true. I do not say this to merely say no, but that we may look at the texts. Enoch, Elijah and Moses all entered Heaven before Christ Jesus died and resurrected and ascended. Texts upon request.

Jesus did not descend into any place to preach anywhere, except to descend to this earth and preach to humanity while He lived, and so enters an assumption into the response. Jesus in death was buried and in the tomb, going nowhere, again texts upon request. Please, ask for these that we may look.

The thief upon the cross will be with Jesus in paradise eventually. The greek is clear, as is John 20, among other texts, which we may look at if you desire. Please, let us look.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
Some people believe in "soul sleep," ... but others consider it a mark of a cult. Both views can be derived from Scripture, although soul sleep is primarily associated with the Old Testament.
Christianity began as a 'cult', in the eyes of the Jews and Romans, called a 'sect', etc. Yet those which were designated as such, were indeed the true followers of Jesus. The majority was in the wrong.

Both views can only be derived from scripture, if one holds to the idea that the scriptures may be twisted to say what we desire and therefore two or more may hold opposing ideas/theology without contradiction. Scriptures speaks of "one faith", even "the faith", which is something very specific, definite.

There are only two spirits in the world, the true and the false, and there is not a third.

Soul Sleep is given from Genesis to Revelation, and texts upon request.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Christianity began as a 'cult', in the eyes of the Jews and Romans, called a 'sect', etc.

Yes--as a sect of Judaism. That was an understandable conclusion on their part. But the modern use of the word "cult" is totally different.

Both views can only be derived from scripture

I am guessing that you are referring to soul sleep, and, if so, we've already agreed that you can find indications of both somewhere or other in scripture.

Soul Sleep is given from Genesis to Revelation, and texts upon request.
But there is much more that refutes it in the New Testament.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...As I said, advocates of soul sleep mainly refer to the OT when the Hebrews' ideas concerning the afterlife were poorly formed. In the NT, it is apparent that a consciousness after physical death is the conventional view.
Not so, and we may look at the scriptures together if you desire to. As for the "poorly formed", are you of the opinion that prophets that saw the future and the things which God hath revealed, or that spake with God directly, or by angel or by visions or dreams from Heaven, did not know so basic a concept as life/death and what happens? The very principle is taught from Genesis, the seed of the whole of Scripture, of which every doctrine may be found in?

They of the OT, especially the patriarchs, were far more intelligent than we, and we are far degraded and degenerated from them, not only in stature, but in might, wisdom, knowledge, age etc.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
Yes--as a sect of Judaism. That was an understandable conclusion on their part. But the modern use of the word "cult" is totally different.

I am guessing that you are referring to soul sleep, and, if so, we've already agreed that you can find indications of both somewhere or other in scripture.

But there is much more that refutes it in the New Testament.
The word "cult" was then also used as derogatory, even that which was "everywhere it is spoken against".

Indeed, soul sleep. You agree that the Bible teaches this? and yet you think other texts will counter itself in what it says already in other places? Do you believe the scriptures to do such also in any other areas?

We may look at any single text you would like to, one at a time please.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The word "cult" was then also used as derogatory.

Not really. At least not in the way it is used now. The word for hundreds of years thereafter meant "an organized system of devotion." We find various church leaders using it in a favorable sense and we also know that it was used in a neutral sense, as when we say that "the cult of the Virgin" was important during the Middle Ages.

Indeed, soul sleep. You agree that the Bible teaches this?
I agreed that there are verses that can be interpreted that way. I also said that there is much more that seems clearly to indicate a consciousness after death.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...it does give us many pieces of information that appear to conflict with something given us in other places in the Bible. It is true that, at bottom, there can't be different answers, but there are apparent conflicts that can't just be ignored.
Let us explore this. Again I agree, with apparent, now just what texts are not so apparent and appear to say something other than the dead do not know anything, etc?
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...[diversionary, moving onto point at hand, I have said what I have said, and you have also]...

I agreed that there are verses that can be interpreted that way. I also said that there is much more that seems clearly to indicate a consciousness after death.
This is the problem, you have not mentioned a text yet. Please pick one, that we may finally begin. "Interpretation" [is the excuse word of the current day theology], the Bible however, defines itself, even as it so gives of itself.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,138
33,258
✟583,842.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
This is the problem, you have not mentioned a text yet. Please pick one, that we may finally begin. "Interpretation" [is the excuse word of the current day theology], the Bible however, defines itself, even as it so gives of itself.

Finally begin? It's over. I know why you believe in soul sleep. I would hope you would also know why 90+% of Christians believe in life after death if you are geared up for a battle over it, and I don't mean any cockamamie conspiracy theories about the Roman Catholic Church making them do so.


But if you insist, here's a list you can work on:
  • Samuel the Prophet wasn’t sleeping (1 Sam. 28:7-19)
  • Moses and Elijah weren’t sleeping (Matt. 17:1-4)
  • The thief on the cross didn’t sleep (Luke 23:43)
  • The Spirit of Jairus’ daughter was not sleeping (Luke 8:51-54)
  • Lazarus and the rich man were not sleeping (Luke 16:20-31)
  • The Old Testament saints weren’t sleeping (Matt. 27:52-53)
  • The souls in Sheol/Hades Christ preached to weren’t sleeping (Eph. 4:8-10)
  • The Great Cloud of witnesses aren’t sleeping (Heb. 11-12)
  • The Heavenly Saints are not sleeping at the Rapture (1 Cor. 15:51-53; 1 Thess. 4:16)
  • The elders in John’s Revelation aren’t sleeping (Rev. 4:4, 10)
  • The martyred tribulation souls aren’t sleeping (Rev. 6:9-11; 20:11)
  • The great multitude redeemed from the great tribulation aren’t sleeping (Rev 7:9, 14)
  • The returning army of Heavenly saints are not sleeping at the Revelation of Christ (Rev. 19:11-14)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...Does it not say that He preached to the "spirits" in prison? What prison? Obviously this refers to the dead. You can't preach to people effectively if they are not cognizant of what is being said. No matter how good of a preacher you are, if your whole congregation is fast asleep, you wasting your time preaching to them for they hear not a word.

This day you will be with me in paradise. This day. Not some day int he future. This day. The problem that you have also is that Jesus had not ascended in this you are correct, but you are forgetting that Jesus is God as well as man. He never left His Father. He never really left Heaven. The Son is just as omnipresent as the Father. And yet He also has a finite human body. This is the mystery of the Incarnation.
Do you desire to consider these two texts [mentioned without citation] exegetically, or are we to merely assert? Please, let us actually look.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
Finally begin? It's over. I know why you believe in soul sleep. I would hope you would also know why 90+% of Christians believe in life after death if you are geared up for a battle over it, and I don't mean any cockamamie conspiracy theories about the Roman Catholic Church making them do so.
Pagans, heathen, and occultists all [a few exceptions] believe the same thing, what spirit are they of? Roman Catholicism fully admits where it finds evidence for its Platonic dualism and teleology of the 'immortal soul/spirit'. Again, the majority means nothing in defining what is true.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...Christ even said when rebuking the Saducees, that the God is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. God is not the God of the dead but of the living. ...
That is taken out of context and wrested/abused to support 'immortal soul' theology, when it doesn't, would you like to actually look at those text, you are mentioning without citing the reference? Again, no meaning any disrespect, I am simply wanting anyone to actually cite a text and for us to actually consider it.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
...But if you insist, here's a list you can work on:
  • Samuel the Prophet wasn’t sleeping (1 Sam. 28:7-19)
  • Moses and Elijah weren’t sleeping (Matt. 17:1-4)
  • The thief on the cross didn’t sleep (Luke 23:43)
  • The Spirit of Jairus’ daughter was not sleeping (Luke 8:51-54)
  • Lazarus and the rich man were not sleeping (Luke 16:20-31)
  • The Old Testament saints weren’t sleeping (Matt. 27:52-53)
  • The souls in Sheol/Hades Christ preached to weren’t sleeping (Eph. 4:8-10)
  • The Great Cloud of witnesses aren’t sleeping (Heb. 11-12)
  • The Heavenly Saints are not sleeping at the Rapture (1 Cor. 15:51-53; 1 Thess. 4:16)
  • The elders in John’s Revelation aren’t sleeping (Rev. 4:4, 10)
  • The martyred tribulation souls aren’t sleeping (Rev. 6:9-11; 20:11)
  • The great multitude redeemed from the great tribulation aren’t sleeping (Rev 7:9, 14)
  • The returning army of Heavenly saints are not sleeping at the Revelation of Christ (Rev. 19:11-14)
It would be preferred that you do not add so large a change to a back post already read from. I almost missed that.

Pick one [even as asked be done... sigh...]. You choose [choose wisely, been through this before]. And we may go through them all.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,459
7,737
Parts Unknown
✟240,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
III Angeli Nuntius said:
It would be preferred that you do not add so large a change to a back post already read from. I almost missed that.

Pick one [even as asked be done... sigh...]. You choose [choose wisely, been through this before]. And we may go through them all.

Did you just ask someone to not post so much that you couldn't respond? Really?

Talk about irony.
 
Upvote 0
I

III Angeli Nuntius

Guest
Did you just ask someone to not post so much that you couldn't respond? Really?

Talk about irony.
Not so. I give the benefit that these texts he has actually read in their context, and so allow him, or even another to choose first. If any do not choose, I will choose, and once chosen, I, by the grace of God - for behold I come in the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, will not cease until all these paper giants and toothless lions be slain upon the ground, put to open and naked shame as they are abused by those who preach the pagan immortal soul theology, and the matter put to sleep, and for these there will be no resurrection.

You have one day to choose.
 
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,459
7,737
Parts Unknown
✟240,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
So you speak with the voice of God and give us an ultimatum?

Why do you feel the need to "enlighten" us? We are happy right where we're at. You wanna believe in no soul, Jesus=michael, and Saturday-only worship, then fine. Go in peace. But why not leave us to our ways, as well?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Stryder06

Check the signature
Jan 9, 2009
13,856
519
✟31,839.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Your right they aren't dead. For no one saved by Christ truly dies. Death, true death are only reserved for those who are not saved in the end. Death as we know it is just a beginning. Not an end. Christ said to the Sadducees that God is not God of the Dead but of the Living. So when I die, if I persevere to the end, I go home to my God and my Lord. My soul doesn't go into some strange suspended state.

You're right. Your soul doesn't go into some suspended state because you are a soul. The breath of God + the dust of the earth = a living soul. Man became a soul. He didn't receive one.

Again you are referencing something before Christ changed the game. Martyrs under the altar are quite aware of what is going on. Why because God gives them that grace as shown:

Rev 6: 9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God and for the testimony which they held. 10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying: How long, O Lord (Holy and True), dost thou not judge and revenge our blood on them that dwell on the earth? 11 And white robes were given to every one of them one; And it was said to them that they should rest for a little time till their fellow servants and their brethren, who are to be slain even as they, should be filled up.

Christ didn't change the game. He established the rules. Those rules said that when you died, you went back to the dust of the earth. It makes no mention of a soul departing and going to heaven or hell. And are you even considering that the vision of the "souls under the altar" was symbolic. I mean do you really think that there are souls held under the altar in some temp containment unit or something?

I agree with you that God does look at death differently than us. The problem is I disagree with your understanding what happens after this flesh dies. Also you must understand that in the NT death is not what we think of it normally.

You are your flesh. That's what God made you. He created you as a fleshly creature, one sustained by the breath of life

Those who are dead are those in hell and/or living in sin on earth. Those alive are they in heaven and/or living in righteousness of Christ. It is easy to get the two mixed up, I understand.

There's no mix up. "The dead know not anything..." See how easy that is?

Really? Where in the Bible does it say that Enoch is one of the 24? Yet you made that comment. So don't apply to others what you are unwilling to apply to yourself.

It doesn't, and i didn't. I said "for all we know" I wasn't making a definitive statment, just posing an example. So I am applying to others what I'm applying to myself. It'd be better to ask than to assume, if you don't understand what I'm saying.

Now where is that in Scripture? The New Testament is full of passages that speak of possessing everlasting life: Mt 19:29; Mk 10:30; Lk 18:30; Jn 3:15,16,36, 4:14,36, 5:24, 6:27,40,47,55, 10:28, 12:50; Act 13:48; I can go on and on and on. I mean this kinda sounds like buddism to me to be honest.

Yes. We shall inherit eternal life. That is true. We do not already possess eternal life. For example, your text - Mk 10:30, says "in the age to come. Also note that only the righteous are promised eternal life, not the wicked. This has nothing to do with buddism, so let's stop that here. This is all about properly dividing the word of God.

Consider this, the reward is eternal life. How is that a reward if you already posses it? If your "true self" is actually a spirit form, and your body is nothing more than a fleshly tent, then you already have that which the bible says is something to come. That's means the scriptures are lying. Even worst, that means Satan was telling the truth when he told eve "You shall not surely die..."
 
Upvote 0