Is there Proof for Creationism?

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
I asked this in another thread, but I didnt get any answer so I figured I would post it in a thread.

Is there any factual proof of Creationism?

A couple things to point out.

Something that disproves evolution, is not proof for creationism.
"Because god did it" or similiar things are beliefs and not facts or proof.
Quoting the bible is not a fact or proof, its a belief.

So any info?
 

kaotic

Learn physics
Sep 22, 2002
4,660
4
North Carolina, USA
Visit site
✟14,836.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Is there any factual proof of Creationism?

Nope and there will not be proof. Just like the theory of evolution there will not be proof. There will only be evidence and that is what make the two different IMO one (theory of evolution) has more evidence than the other (which has none).
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Good point.

To the creationists: What about evidence than?

Originally posted by seesaw
Nope and there will not be proof. Just like the theory of evolution there will not be proof. There will only be evidence and that is what make the two different IMO one (theory of evolution) has more evidence than the other (which has none).
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Well, this isnt just a christian forum. Its being hosted by christian forums but its for other religions as well.

Well, actually Yes I Did. I wanted to know if there was any evidence for creationism. I asked it in another thread and no one answered, so I wanted to ask it here.

Originally posted by ikester7579
If there's no proof why ask? I know, we come to a christain forum and ask a question there is not evidence to to start an arguement. Did I get it right? I'm sure you did not post this to learn something now did you?
 
Upvote 0

ikester7579

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2003
1,452
23
Florida
✟1,800.00
Faith
Non-Denom
And if I answered, it would be down played in demeaning tones is usually the norm. looking to learn? I see questions but the answers you don't won't so why ask? Admit it, there's no answer that could be given here on creation that you would take as fact. You would not believe it's source or it would be out dated. Right?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Well so far you havent given any answers.

I do have one question (yes this will be sarcasm), I know mind reading is considered to be witch craft and witch craft is considered Sinful. But what about attempted mind reading?

You seemed to be fixated on one issue. I questioned an article that was written in 1985 and asked if you had up to date sources. All I wanted to know was if you had newer, more up to date info on the topic.

Originally posted by ikester7579
And if I answered, it would be down played in demeaning tones is usually the norm. looking to learn? I see questions but the answers you don't won't so why ask? Admit it, there's no answer that could be given here on creation that you would take as fact. You would not believe it's source or it would be out dated. Right?
 
Upvote 0
Arikay;

 

Proof for creationism.  My Lord told me so.

His love and guiding hand are constantly moving me towrd the narrow path. 

I have prayed and he has answered

Scripture

Jesus

When the Holy Spirit hits you....you can do nothing but believe...Amen!!!!

Oh wait...none of this is valid to you, so it can't be entered as evidence.   Darn you win...stay in the dark....I will continue to bask in his light!
 
Upvote 0

LewisWildermuth

Senior Veteran
May 17, 2002
2,526
128
51
Bloomington, Illinois
✟11,875.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The problem is that there is no evidence for creation that does not equaly support evolution and as far as evidence goes evolution has far more backing it up than any other theory. So to creationists evidence has become unimportant because it does not support their opinion.

Many will site the Bible or the Holy Spirit or God as telling them that special creation is true, but there is a problem with that. Many who do read the Bible, and claim to have a relation with God and/or the Holy Spirit that believe they have been told just the opposite. Myself for one. So since they discount the importance of evidence we are only left with a battle of opinions and one can never win a battle that is only based on what one "feels" is right.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Defending Our Lord
Proof for creationism.  My Lord told me so.

If that is all it takes, then Genesis proves that the moonlandings were a hoax. The Bible also proves that bats are birds, that rabbits chew their cud, that demons cause disease. . . .
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Upvote 0
Clue,

AiG and ICR are not objective sources for facts and evidence. That is because they clearly state in their statements of faith/mission statements that if evidence conflicts with their biblical interpretation that the evidence must be wrong, not the interpretation. In otherwords, the validity of data is determined by wheather if fits into their religious belief. And if there is one truth about science, it is that its accuracy cannont be determined by emotion, philosophy, politics, or religion.

Can you offer any evidence that would lead an objective observer, ignorant of scriputre and biblical teachings, to conclude that special creation accounts for the diveristy of life and/or that the world is young?
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
40
Visit site
✟21,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Defending: If you didnt read the begining, "god told me so" is not viable evidence any "____ told me so" isnt evidence, its only belief, so that wouldnt make it evidence.

Clue: Very interesting. I found some info. do you think you could point me in the right direction for evidence? Much of what I found falls under the three things in the first thread, that I mentioned Werent evidence, only belief.
 
Upvote 0

nephilimiyr

I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
Jan 21, 2003
23,432
1,799
60
Wausau Wisconsin
Visit site
✟40,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Good question Arikay! The only way I can answer you is to point out that things just don't happen because they happen. All evidence shows that things happen for a reason because of laws.

We know that the universe is governed by several fundamental physical laws, electromagnetic forces, gravity, conservation of mass and energy, etc. The activities of our universe depends upon these laws just like the computer were useing depends on the hardware with it's instruction written down. On that note I submitt to you that a creator had to first set these laws into motion before anything of mass and energy happend.



 
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Originally posted by RufusAtticus
AiG and ICR are not objective sources for facts and evidence. That is because they clearly state in their statements of faith/mission statements that if evidence conflicts with their biblical interpretation that the evidence must be wrong, not the interpretation. In otherwords, the validity of data is determined by wheather if fits into their religious belief. And if there is one truth about science, it is that its accuracy cannont be determined by emotion, philosophy, politics, or religion.

Can you offer any evidence that would lead an objective observer, ignorant of scriputre and biblical teachings, to conclude that special creation accounts for the diveristy of life and/or that the world is young?

I'm not going to discuss Facts vs. Interpretation and Biblical bias vs. Naturalistic bias in this thread.  Suffice it to say, I disagree with the implications of your above statement based on those grounds.
 
Upvote 0