Mitt Romney is at it again

LoAmmi

Dispassionate
Mar 12, 2012
26,944
9,715
✟209,533.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
There is a FISA court judge on call 24-7 who can render a decision in under 15 minutes, from what I've heard- they should make use of him or her

They can also get the decision after the fact.

In essence, under previous law they could wiretap without a warrant but get the warrant later. This was due to the fact that the call they needed might be going on that second and even waiting 15 minutes would lose evidence. If the judge ruled that it wasn't something that deserved a warrant, the evidence was not admissible.
 
Upvote 0

TheOtherHockeyMom

Contributor
Jul 9, 2008
5,935
274
✟14,889.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Sunstein advocates giving animals the legal right to sue human beings in court.

I understand it's rooted in wanting to wipe out cruelty to animals, but come on.

PolitiFact | Sunstein has said people ought to be able to sue on behalf of abused animals

It seems to me what he was saying is that there ought to be a way to prosecute those who violate existing anti-cruelty laws, by allowing people to sue companies that break these laws in their mistreatment of animals.

From the article:
That Sunstein is an animal rights activist is undisputed. For a CNN interview in the late 1990s, he once insisted on being joined on-air by his dog, a Rhodesian Ridgeback named Perry. And LaPierre is correct when he says that Sunstein has talked about allowing animals to sue — albeit through a human representative. But we think LaPierre has twisted Sunstein's words. Sunstein wasn't saying you — the meat eater — could be sued by Porky Pig for eating bacon. But he was saying that if the pig that winds up on your breakfast plate was raised or killed in a way that violates existing animal cruelty laws, then someone ought to be able to sue the processor on the pig's behalf. That's all, folks.

Does that thinking raise one to the level of 'whackjob'? If so, I guess I have to join the club because it seems to me that having animal cruelty laws on the books without teeth is meaningless.
 
Upvote 0

Genersis

Person of Disinterest
Sep 26, 2011
6,073
751
32
London
✟38,690.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Labour
...
By militant I mean he favors taking confused, vulnerable adolescents and proselytizing them into the homosexual lifestyle. That's what his organization GLSEN is all about: recruitment. He is an anti-Christian bigot and a moral cripple.

"Wow", is all that is applicable to this statement.
 
Upvote 0

rainbojo

and yet
Aug 19, 2008
584
48
✟15,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We all know the press is having a field day with what Mitt Romney said to his 'RICH donors" and we all know that Obama does not have any RICH donors (she types sarcastically) So keep chewing, like a salivating dog with a juicy bone, how awful Romney is and those terrible conversative people with their backward beliefs. Bury your heads you liberals to less important things like the YouTube that Obama spread was the reason for a terrorist attack on 9/11 in Libya. Is that called 'blind' or just deaf and dumb. I'm not sure.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,765
1,428
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟160,220.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Remember when Romney made such condescending comments about 47 percent of Americans who don't pay income tax, including veterans, retirees, the disabled, and workers who pay the payroll tax but don't make enough money to pay income tax? He's at it again. What a sore loser.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/romney-obamas-gift-giving-led-to-loss/2012/11/14/c8d7e744-2eb7-11e2-89d4-040c9330702a_story.html

This is the same Mitt Romney who made fifty million dollars from Stericycle, a company that provides incineration services for a certain medical industry. This is the same Romney who, if elected, would certainly provide gifts for wealthy people, like tax breaks and corporate subsidies.

Things people really feel tend to slip out in time...
 
Upvote 0

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I was looking forward to one thing and one thing only from this election, and I thought it was a sure thing: for the news to stop breaking stories of "hey, guess what Romney said!" I swear for the month of October I got my news of the world entirely by deducing what must have happened based off the stories criticizing Romney's reaction to events.

Please don't tell me that this is going to continue even through the end of the election.
 
Upvote 0

catholicbybirth

St. Louis, pray for me.
Aug 11, 2012
1,678
37
Western Kentucky
✟17,029.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Obama now is blamed for spreading the you tube video? Huh?


I think she meant Obama spread the reason of the Consulate attack as the video. Not that Obama spread the video on the internet.

Janice
 
Upvote 0

Fish and Bread

Dona nobis pacem
Jan 31, 2005
14,109
2,389
✟68,185.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I was looking forward to one thing and one thing only from this election, and I thought it was a sure thing: for the news to stop breaking stories of "hey, guess what Romney said!" I swear for the month of October I got my news of the world entirely by deducing what must have happened based off the stories criticizing Romney's reaction to events.

Please don't tell me that this is going to continue even through the end of the election.

At this point, I think that's up to Mitt Romney. Since he lost and probably isn't going to run for anything again, people would probably stop talking about stuff he says if he stopped holding big gatherings or group phone calls and saying things! Obviously, it's his right to do that as an American if he wants to, but traditionally losing President candidates have laid low for a while and let the winner have his moment in the sun.

After Al Gore conceded in 2000, I don't think we saw or heard much from him for several months, after which he did an interview or two, and didn't seem to resurface for several years, and when he did it was in a relatively apolitical role as an environmental advocate initially. Even Kerry, who was still in the Senate, kept quiet for a while. I don't recall what McCain did (Though he's sure making a lot of noise right now- I wonder if he's ever really gotten over losing in 2008 the way he opposes Obama these days- he used to build bridges with Democrats, and now everything he does seems sorched earth. I think it's very possible he's holding a personal grudge.).

Anyhow, it's up to Mitt Romney. Usually losing candidates like to drop out of the limelight and decompress. Let people chill out some. I think it'd be to his benefit, too- if the last word from Romney had been his graceful short concession speech, he could have come back and rebuilt his reputation and worked with the President on some things and so on and so forth (Even though further elected office was probably out for him from the word go). By continuing to go on and on with bitter comments that attack a lot of the country's population even after the campaign is over, though, Romney is going to likely comment his legacy as Mr. 47%. It's not smart political strategy, but I guess he figures since he isn't likely to run for anything again, he can just indulge his bitter feelings without repercussions. There are repercussions, though, in the sense that it makes it harder for his supporters to get over the election and accept the results when their candidate doesn't, and there are repercussions for the regular folks that he demonizes, because people believe what he says and ostracize those regular folks.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Wolseley

Beaucoup-Diên-Cai-Dāu
Feb 5, 2002
21,128
5,621
63
By the shores of Gitchee-Goomee
✟276,580.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I was looking forward to one thing and one thing only from this election, and I thought it was a sure thing: for the news to stop breaking stories of "hey, guess what Romney said!" I swear for the month of October I got my news of the world entirely by deducing what must have happened based off the stories criticizing Romney's reaction to events.

Please don't tell me that this is going to continue even through the end of the election.

Oh, yes---it's going to continue for some time. We have Four More Years!® after all; and when Romney ceases to be relevant, you can fully expect them to go back to excoriating George Bush.

I think it's very possible he's holding a personal grunge.).

A personal grunge??? :scratch:

All he's gotta do is take a shower....
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AMDG

Tenderized for Christ
May 24, 2004
25,362
1,286
74
Pacific Northwest, United States
✟47,022.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Always have to laugh at the hyenas that try to critique a presidential candidate and wonder "what went wrong" and *how we can change it". It always sounds to me as if they are simply playing a game and not being true to their convictions. It sounds to me as if they simply don't care about convictions. That all they care about is winning. :::Shakes head at that.::: Half the country is quite certain that it's not "all about winning"--it's about convictions.

Oh well, they can pull in their claws and lick their fangs, because they can't touch Romney anymore. He's a private citizen once again. No more character assisination. Private citizens don't have to put up with it. Those wanting to "win" will just have to chew themselves up and get ready for next time--*if* there is a next time.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟22,581.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I try not to get into heated debates because it's bad for my blood pressure. If you want the Republican to win the next presidential election, choose one who doesn't insult poor people and who didn't make millions of dollars from the abortion industry. I didn't vote for Romney but I didn't vote for Obama either.
 
Upvote 0

AMDG

Tenderized for Christ
May 24, 2004
25,362
1,286
74
Pacific Northwest, United States
✟47,022.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
If you want the Republican to win the next presidential election, choose one who doesn't insult poor people and who didn't make millions of dollars from the abortion industry. I didn't vote for Romney but I didn't vote for Obama either.

He didn't insult the poor. He spoke truth--47% at that time (obviously we reached the tipping point). He spoke the truth again, that it's normal politician behavior to pander to those in order to get votes from them. (Years ago in South Carolina, my grandfather-in-law sold his vote for a pack of cigarettes. Today that one lady sold her vote for an "Obama phone". While still others sold their votes for a temporary two years of the Dream Act. And many women like Sandra Fluke sold their votes for free birth control. That's how politicians act. Quid pro Quo. "You scratch my back, I scratch yours". "What's in it for me", instead of "What's good for the country." The only thing that has changed from my grandfather-in-law's day is that votes cost a bit more than that "pack of cigarettes.")

But I can't understand this "circular firing squad" with Romney. He's a private citizen now. Above dirty politics.
 
Upvote 0

TheOtherHockeyMom

Contributor
Jul 9, 2008
5,935
274
✟14,889.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
He didn't insult the poor. He spoke truth--47% at that time (obviously we reached the tipping point). He spoke the truth again, that it's normal politician behavior to pander to those in order to get votes from them. (Years ago in South Carolina, my grandfather-in-law sold his vote for a pack of cigarettes. Today that one lady sold her vote for an "Obama phone". While still others sold their votes for a temporary two years of the Dream Act. And many women like Sandra Fluke sold their votes for free birth control. That's how politicians act. Quid pro Quo. "You scratch my back, I scratch yours". "What's in it for me", instead of "What's good for the country." The only thing that has changed from my grandfather-in-law's day is that votes cost a bit more than that "pack of cigarettes.")

But I can't understand this "circular firing squad" with Romney. He's a private citizen now. Above dirty politics.

The Church supported the Dream Act, according to what I heard Cardinal Dolan say. I'll see if I can find a transcript.

If Republicans want to win, they need to stop dismissing math and science. Romney could have won this, I think, but was sabotaged by his own suppoters at all levels...when they kept refusing to believe and work with the data. Every poll and analysis that presented an honest, rigorous look at the situation was dismissed, often by people with little knowledge of statistics and data collection. Instead they believed the rose colored glasses version sold to them by Fox and other such sources. So, opportunities were missed to close the gap because too many didn't believe it existed. Makes sense in a way, as I imagine Fox, Rush and the like lose big chunks of audience when their side wins. People seem to choose partisan news sources when their side is not in power, so they can hear griping and comiserate. While looking sad in front of the camera, it wouldn't surprise me if there was celebrating in private on Fox, the EIB, and Beck's studio.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums