Bronze age models of reality.So what is it people hope to cure when they wear rose colored glasses?
Upvote
0
Bronze age models of reality.So what is it people hope to cure when they wear rose colored glasses?
It is a useful assumption; if it had not happened, we would not be discussing it.Correct me if I'm wrong, but evolutionists want us creationists to just assume, as they do, that abiogenesis occurred;
Welcome back. I was hoping you'd have new material.and since I don't believe in abiogenesis, I don't believe in atom-to-adam evolution.
Welcome back. I was hoping you'd have new material.
Thank you, sir! It's good to be back!
It is a useful assumption; if it had not happened, we would not be discussing it.
Creationists not only confuse abiogenesis with evolution, but they confuse the big bang theory, the origin of the earth and just about everything else they don't like with evolution as well.
I am not one to argue the bible, but the abiogenesis issue comes across to me as a god-of-the-gaps argument. As we don't know the precise conditions under which the process of life began, it is something they can cling to desperately. That they cannot reconcile their arguments with the the bible does not surprise me.They deny abiogenesis happened. And yet the Bible describes it in Genesis 2:7.
So that tells you that they REEEEEALLY hate abiogenesis if they are even willing to deny the Bible on that topic.
Looks like your not going to find anyone to do your research for you.They deny abiogenesis happened. And yet the Bible describes it in Genesis 2:7.
It is implicit in the TOE that life 'evolved' from dead matter. Because 'evolution' had to begin immediately (soon) after the first 'life form' appeared it is no great leap to think that 'evolution' really began with the 'transition' from lifeless chemical matter to a simple life form; the first of billions of evolutionary steps. No honest believer in the TOE can deny this.
How living things evolved over time into other living things is no different from how nonliving things evolved over time into living things.
It's all evolution.
I know. The Bible says it was "dust".
Correct me if I'm wrong, but evolutionists want us creationists to just assume, as they do, that abiogenesis occurred; and since I don't believe in abiogenesis, I don't believe in atom-to-adam evolution.
Thank you, Sky! Thank you, very much!He did ask about you.
Good to see you.
To reverse the Biblical saying, perhaps you can come up with a new skin for your old wine?
And science trumps the bible any day of the week.
Like how much you can beat your slave. Exodous 21Apples and oranges. The bible deals with important issues.
Originally Posted by AV1611VETCorrect me if I'm wrong, but .....Why not?