Mary Sinless?

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,750
1,265
✟330,308.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
But it is self-authenticating. Here's an easy example: OT prophesied to Christ. NT shows fulfillment.
The first thing a non-believer will tell you is that when given a prophecy, anybody can write a story to 'fulfill' it. In other words, they would say the NT story is crafted by the authors with the intent to appear to fulfill the OT prophecy, which would be easy enough to do. Likewise, anyone could pen a book that "claims" divine authorship or inspiration.

God could have simply inspired someone to pen that Christ had resurrected from the dead and ascended to heaven without the need of anyone witnessing the event. But he does not -- hundreds of peope -- "the church" -- indeed are witnesses to the event and can testify to the truth of the story both to those around them and to their children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren. They bring testimony that validates the authenticity of the writings and the discernment to distginuish those false writings that appear.
 
Upvote 0

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,750
1,265
✟330,308.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Okay, just checking to make sure the concept of her giving birth didn't automatically disqualify her for some reason for RC.

As to the first point, we have talked about this. I think what has been missed is the context at that time 2000 years ago. IOW, the only alternative to believing what scripture says (she had at least 6 more children) is to adopt the docetic, nonapostolic Protoevangelium of James. There is no other choice 2000 years ago.

Here is what they believed:

1) Joseph/Mary had children after Jesus---scripture.
2) Joseph/former wife had children before Jesus---the docetic Protoevangelium of James.

Now, you should know that Origen, when faced with those two choices, picked #2. How about you?

Please point out where the Scriptures say that Mary gave birth to 6 additional children?

I believe that Mary is ever-virgin. Beyond that, I have little opinion or need to specifically identify the lineage of the brothers of Jesus.

I think the value of the Protoevangelium of James for me was to clarify how many "assumptions" are made about Mary and Joseph that are not present in the Scripture story. For example, that this was a marriage between two young people with the expectation of starting their own family. Nothing in Scripture says that -- it is merely a fabric of some traditions that people build their belief around.

Based on my study of the word adelphos, my conclusion is they are relatives through the clan of Joseph. Beyond that, I have no opinions one way or the other, think your list could be well expanded to include other scenarios, and personally don't really care.
 
Upvote 0

Lion King

Veni, vidi, vici
Mar 29, 2011
7,360
578
Heavenly Jerusalem- Mount Zion
✟10,388.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Honestly, Lion King, I wish you would pay closer attention to what I say. Stephen was "full of" or "filled with" grace and "power" or "fortitude" at the time he was disputing with the chief priests in the synagogue and managed to convert some of them. He was bestowed with grace that was "plentiful" enough to grant him the wisdom and strength to bear the adversity he would have to face during the time of his mission. A cabinet can be full of medicine or "abundant" with medicine making it "well-supplied" for the time of need. And although the cabinet is full of the required medicine for a particular ailment, it doesn't mean that in order to be full the cabinet must contain all the medicines that have ever been produced even for more serious ailments.

Care to show me where it says in the Scriptures that Stephen was "full of grace and power" only temporarily?

When the angel Gabriel addressed Mary with the title kecharitomene - having been completely, perfectly, and permanently endowed with grace (charis) - he wasn't simply describing her at a given instance in time as Stephen is in the Book of Acts. And by grace the angel did not mean the actual graces of wisdom and fortitude, which are helping or signal graces that lead to the state of sanctification. The grace the angel had in mind was that of sanctification itself which Eve had helped forfeit for her biological descendants by listening to the word of the fallen angel.

How do I know you are not simply making things up as you go? Scriptures please?:)

PS. I'm not in the habit of accepting what people say, simply because they claim to be from the LORD.

The Greek singular female vocative can be paraphrased or translated in the Latin to mean "full of grace", for Mary had been endowed with a fullness of sanctifying grace to the "extreme capacity", having been "completely and perfectly" endowed with grace in view of her maternal vocation, which required that she be preserved free from all the grave spiritual ailments caused by the stain of original sin: concupiscence of the eyes, concupiscence of the flesh, and the pride of life. To conceive and bear the holy Child of God as a mother worthy of him, the spiritual gifts of wisdom and fortitude, however plentiful and well-supplied in her soul, wouldn't be enough to meet her divine call.

As I have already shown you earlier, the Greek for full of grace is "plaras karitos" and it occurs in only two places in the New Testament; neither one is in reference to Mary.

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:14
_ _ _

Now Stephen, a man full of God's grace and power, did great wonders and miraculous signs among the people. Acts 6:8.


:thumbsup:

Mary had to be perpetually holy - from the moment she was conceived to the time of her dormition - in order to be the mother of the divine Son. Her mission was lifelong.

Correction; God alone is eternally holy!

Anyway, where is it said in the Scriptures that one had to be "everlasting holy" to bear the only-begotten Son of God?

She already was the mother of our Lord before the Annunciation and Incarnation by God's eternal decree once God created her in time. Until Mary was conceived and born, she always existed as an idea in the eternal mind of God.

No No No.

Mary was NOT the mother of Christ before the Annunciation and Incarnation, for God has NO mother! She only became the mother of Christ in the flesh, after Christ came into the world as a HUMAN BEING. Just because the LORD knows each and everyone of us and set us apart before we are even born (Jeremiah 1:5, Psalm 139), does not mean that we already were in existence long before being actually born.

Before Christ came into the world, before He became flesh, He had no mother! He is the LORD from everlasting, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End..:bow::bow:

"I will surely bless you and make your descendants (seed) as numerous as the stars of the sky and as the sand on the seashore."
Genesis 22, 17

I will make your descendants (seed) as numerous as the stars in the sky and will give them all these lands and through your offspring (seed) all nations on earth will be blessed.
Genesis 26, 4

Christ is Abraham's seed by bloodline and ethnic ancestry through Isaac, as all Jews are, though only a remnant will be saved, and even the Gentiles who would come to embrace the faith at the time of the New Covenant can be counted as Abraham's descendants in spirit. Jesus is Mary's seed by being her actual biological offspring and the "fruit of her womb", unlike any other Jew.

I'm not sure I follow what you are trying to say here? Are you by any chance trying to claim that Mary's role in God's plan was significantly greater than Abraham's, or are you simply downplaying Abraham? Or is it both?

Christ is the fruit of Mary's womb > Christ is the seed of Abraham

Is this what you are trying to imply?:confused:

When God spoke to the serpent about the woman Eve (Gen 3:15), he prophetically alluded to both Israel and Mary (cf. Rev 12). Figuratively, Israel is the mother of Christ as she is of all Jews who come from her. The psalmist tells us: "Zion shall be called mother, for all shall be her children." Israel (Jacob) is a corporate entity descended from Abraham through Isaac, who prefigures Christ. Through Israel the promises made to Abraham find their fulfillment. All nations shall be blessed only in Christ, a son of Israel. "Salvation comes from the Jews," Jesus told the Samaritan woman, though not through the law but by faith.

You are correct, all the nations on earth are blessed through Christ (Israel), the seed of Abraham.

However, Mary is more than the actual mother of Christ; she was also his personal tabernacle or dwelling place typical of the ark of the Old Covenant. And so as a personal individual entity, Mary was fashioned pure and spotless as a living, sacred temple to be fit enough to harbour the actual presence of God when being overshadowed (episkiasei) by the Holy Spirit just as the glory cloud (shekinah) had covered (epikiasei) the meeting tent in which the ark rested.

Others say that Christ (and not Mary) is the ark of the New Covenant), due to several reasons. Some being:

-Romans 3:25

-John 1:14 says "the word became flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory." In the Greek the word dwelt is "skeinoo" from the Hebrew word "shekinah" which was the word for "God residing in the Tabernacle." Jesus clothed himself in human flesh (Phil 2:5-8) the ark was His body as it had carried the Creator of the universe. It was not Mary who was the ark, but Jesus Christ's body that was the Tabernacle.

...but I won't go into that discussion at the moment.

Thus Jesus was Abraham's seed by being born of a Jewish woman and descendant of Abraham through Isaac. But he became man by being born of a woman, notwithstanding whether she was Jewish, who according to God's specifications, had to be pure and righteous as he was in his humanity to be worthy of her divine maternity.

So, if Mary had be sinless to be "worthy" of bearing the only begotten Son of God who had no sin in Him, doesn't it mean that Mary's mother had to be sinless as well (to be able to bear Mary)?

The blessing of all nations finds its fulfillment in the divine Messiah, the offspring of Abraham by bloodline and ethnic ancestry through Mary his Jewish mother.

By the way, the ethnic ancestry of Christ is traced through Joseph and not Mary.

In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.”
Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.”

“How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God." Luke 1:26-35


God's words to the serpent could not have been realized by his decree without the virgin birth.

And the dragon was angry against the woman: and went to make war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.
Revelation 12, 17

That woman mentioned in that above passage is NOT Mary, but Israel. The devil is at war with the REMNANT of Israel:

A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth. Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads. Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth. The dragon stood in front of the woman who was about to give birth, so that it might devour her child the moment he was born. She gave birth to a son, a male child, who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.” And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne. Revelation 12:1-5

While it is true that Mary gave birth to Jesus, it is also true that Jesus, the son of David from the tribe of Judah, came from Israel. In a sense, Israel gave birth—or brought forth—Christ Jesus.

Then he had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. “Listen,” he said, “I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.”

When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father rebuked him and said, “What is this dream you had? Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?” His brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the matter in mind. Genesis 37:9-11


Joseph was one of the twelve sons of Israel. From his dream we are shown that the sun, the moon, and the twelve stars represent Israel and his family. Israel – formerly called Jacob – had twelve sons from which emerge the twelve tribes of Israel. And it is through Israel’s seed that God promises to bring forth His Son – the Messiah – Jesus Christ.

True, but not everything contained in Tradition is "explicitly" found in Scripture. We must often read the Scriptures in a spiritual sense.

As long as it is found in the Scriptures, that is fine by me.:)

Not without the grace of God. ;) We cleanse our hearts and purify ourselves by accepting and cooperating with the graces we have received through the Holy Spirit.

That goes without saying.:thumbsup:

We partake of the divine life when being in the state of sanctifying grace. This is lost when we commit a mortal sin (i.e., murder or adultery) until we sincerely repent and do penance, ideally through the sacrament of reconciliation. The more venial sins we commit, the less holy we are in God's sight while still in the state of sanctification, and the more time we have to spend in purgatory to make satisfaction and appease the Father's justice by being cleansed of and temporally punished for the remnants of sin. Again, Mary was permanently and completely graced, and so she could never have fallen from or regressed in grace in spite of her free will. Her soul constantly "magnified" the Lord.

..I lost you there? :confused:
 
Upvote 0

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Care to show me where it says in the Scriptures that Stephen was "full of grace and power" only temporarily?

The grammatical exponents in the passage function to indicate what Luke intends to say and nothing more. Here is the English transliteration of the Greek text.

stephanos de playrais charitos kai dunamaos epoie terata kai saimaya megala en to lao.

Charitos is the noun used in Acts 6:8. It places charis (grace) in a genetive case. If we look at the verb epoie in this passage, we can place the noun within a time reference. The verb tense is imperfect past progressive, so it indicates that the action - performing great signs and wonders - is completed in the past and left there. So charitos simply indicates that Stephen was full of or filled with wisdom and fortitude (actual helping graces) while he was debating with the religious elders in the synagogue and performing great signs and wonders, which may have helped him convert some of the chief priests. Whether Stephen remained wise and strong after this event is unimportant. The point is that Luke isn't concerned with the time before and after the event during which Stephen was filled with a sufficient supply of grace. But that is not so with regard to Mary.

In Luke 11:28, we have the angel say, "Chaire kecharitomene." Again, the term is a perfect passive participle and singular female vocative. A participle is a verb that is used to describe a subject. The perfect tense describes an action in the present with a completed aspect. And since this term is used as a title, the evangelist doesn't intend to describe Mary's state within the time reference of the present moment. He presents the angel as saying, "Hail, you who have been "completely, perfectly, and permanently endowed with grace." Someone completely endowed with grace is obviously full of grace despite the verbal difference. Mary's endowment of grace to the extreme capacity is a completed past action with a lasting effect into the future. And Luke is concerned with this fact which is obvious by his use of grammar. He is acknowledging an important and fundmental belief about Mary in the Palestinian Christian community of his time. Scripture (the written word of God) does proceed from Tradition (the spoken word of God). Some Protestant Greek scholars will tell you the same thing about kecharitomene.

How do I know you are not simply making things up as you go? Scriptures please?:)

Luke does typify Mary as the ark of the Covenant, which is still regarded as the most sacred religious relic in Judaism. As you know, the ark contained the two stone tablets of Moses (the Torah), the budding rod of the priest Aaron, and the manna that came down from heaven. For the Jews there could be no concordance between the sacred and the profane. For this reason God instructed Moses to fashion the ark with the purest natural materials, such as gold and accacia wood. And because the ark was sacred, God slew Uzzah for having touched it even though his intentions were good. Luke draws a parallel between the ark and Mary in his Infancy Narrative by referring to the second Book of Samuel. Again, acknowledging a traditional belief of his time, he is bearing witness to how the Jewish Christians in the infant church perceived Mary. As the ark of the New Covenant, Mary held the divine Word made flesh, the High Priest in the order of Melchizidek, and the true manna or bread of life come down from heaven. Her womb was a sacred dwelling place for the divine Messiah, the one who would be called holy, the Son of God. Like the ark of the Old Covenant, Mary was fashioned pure and undefiled, but by the sanctifying grace of God. It was the grace of sanctification the angel Gabriel was referring to at the appointed time of the Incarnation. No wonder Mary was troubled by his words when he addressed her with the unique title. She had no idea that she was immaculately conceived.

As I have already shown you earlier, the Greek for full of grace is "plaras karitos" and it occurs in only two places in the New Testament; neither one is in reference to Mary.

And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth. John 1:14
_ _ _

Now Stephen, a man full of God's grace and power, did great wonders and miraculous signs among the people. Acts 6:8.

Comparing Mary with Jesus and Stephen is like comparing a peach with an apple and a plum. All three were graced in a different manner. The graces Mary and Stephen received pertain to their divine vocations, in which case Mary's vocation was of much greater importance. Stephen wouldn't have been preaching in Jerusalem if it hadn't been for Mary's fiat. And the grace Jesus possessed pertains to his being. Verbal distinctions are of no importance. What matters is context and the underlying meanings of words. Kecharitomene is synonymous with "full of grace" (gratia plena). And fullness can mean more than one thing in different shades.

Correction; God alone is eternally holy!

Anyway, where is it said in the Scriptures that one had to be "everlasting holy" to bear the only-begotten Son of God?

I never said Mary was "eternally" holy, but "perpetually" holy throughout her life. Naturally no human creature can ever be ontologically and absolutely holy as God is. But we can and are expected to reach a relative state of holiness and justice by God's merciful standard in our lives through his sanctifying grace, by the merits of Christ's precious blood. This is part of the fulfillment of the promise made to Abraham concerning his descendants.

"This was the oath he swore to our father Abraham:
to set us free from the hands of our enemies,
free to worship him without fear,
holy and righteous in his sight
all the days of our life."
Luke 1, 73-75

I have to go, so I'll complete my reply to your last post another time. Thanks. :)

PAX
:angel:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Hi, this is my first post on this site, and I look forward to exploring the community.

To start, I'm currently a member of a Baptist church, and I have been studying Catholicism and Church history lately. My main studies on Catholicism have been over the Internet through various sites, and I've got a book I'm currently reading about the Early Church.

Through my research, I've found that the Catholics have many good points that they defend through Scripture. I can't say that I agree with everything, but I'm developing a much greater understanding of why Catholics believe what they do. Of course, it's hard to argue with a point when there is Scripture to support it, and so I've found that most of my issues with the Church are resolved.

Here is probably the single greatest thing that I now take exception to, and that is the idea that Mary, mother of Jesus, did not sin. I've read a bit on this topic, but it just does not make sense to me that she, who was only human, could have possibly been sinless.

Please note that I'm simply trying to learn as much as I can, and of course I pray that God will lead me down the right path. I know that He will not let me down as long as my trust is in Christ. With that said, I would really appreciate anyone's clarification about Mary, and where the idea of her sinlessness and the Immaculate Conception came from. Thank you.

Mary was used of God to give birth to Jesus the Christ. He was her Savior, as He was with all else who embraced Him as theirs. He died on the cross for Mary, covering her sins with his blood as anyone else.

Just a note: Mary was not the mother of God. No one gave birth to God. She was the female human God used to give birth to Jesus Christ, to fulfill the prophesy (to reconcile the world to Himself).

If Mary was "sinless". it is she who would've died on the cross for the sins of the world, and would've been called the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world, and would've been God the Father, incarnate, called Emmanuel, God is with us. there would've been no need for God to send His only begotten Son to the world, as it is written in this verse:

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." ~John 3:16

God is Who He is. He doesn't have a mother. He also did not send Mary to this earth to take away the sins of the world. He also did not intend for anyone to worship her, for if she was indeed sinless, that's what one would do...worship her. It is written that only the spotless Lamb of God is worthy, Who has taken away the sins of the world.

Mary cannot save any of us, not even herself. She is who she is. A sinner, in need of God's grace, just like any of us, amen?

God is Who He is. He will share His glory with none other:

I AM the GOD of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob! - YouTube
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Tzaousios

Αυγουστινιανικός Χριστιανός
Dec 4, 2008
8,504
609
Comitatus in praesenti
Visit site
✟26,729.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do I know you are not simply making things up as you go? Scriptures please?:)

PS. I'm not in the habit of accepting what people say, simply because they claim to be from the LORD.

No No No.

Mary was NOT the mother of Christ before the Annunciation and Incarnation, for God has NO mother! She only became the mother of Christ in the flesh, after Christ came into the world as a HUMAN BEING. Just because the LORD knows each and everyone of us and set us apart before we are even born (Jeremiah 1:5, Psalm 139), does not mean that we already were in existence long before being actually born.

Before Christ came into the world, before He became flesh, He had no mother! He is the LORD from everlasting, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End..

It looks like you are pushing Nestorianism just so that you can maintain positions that are specifically contrary to whatever Roman Catholicism teaches.
 
Upvote 0

Tzaousios

Αυγουστινιανικός Χριστιανός
Dec 4, 2008
8,504
609
Comitatus in praesenti
Visit site
✟26,729.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I do not hold the opinions of the your early church elders to be valuable and useful in edification, simply because they are not part of MY assembly. The RCC has no authority over me, and the RCC pope ain't my father (for I have only one Holy-Father) nor my Shepherd.

Please state why they are not part of your assembly and what your assembly is. Please be specific.
 
Upvote 0

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
No No No.

Mary was NOT the mother of Christ before the Annunciation and Incarnation, for God has NO mother!

Yes, yes. yes!

Before the Annunciation and Incarnation Mary was eternally decreed to be the mother of Christ. What she has been predestined to be by God's eternal decree oustside of real physical time is irrevocable or else she would not be the mother of Christ in the eternal mind of God. The saints who have been predestined to glory are assuredly saved even before they die, for God's knowledge - reserved to him alone - of each and every one of them before they were born is infallible and so cannot be otherwise. In eternity there is no state of being and then not being because of the constraints imposed by the categories of real physical time: past, present, and future. God essentially exists in eternity outside of time and space, although he is omnipresent in the created order, and so we cannot speak of Mary as being not the mother of Christ and then being the mother of Christ to God. She has always been conceived in the mind of God as being the mother of Christ before she was born. If this weren't true, then we would have to presuppose that God's knowledge is fallible and God could be mistaken. Mary actually became the mother of Christ physically in time the moment she was overshadowed by the Holy Spirit. But to God she has always been and still is the mother of Christ. We musn't think that Mary could not be the mother of Christ unless she conceived and bore him, but rather think she could not be his mother if God had chosen another Jewish maiden instead by his eternal decree. Since we ourselves now know that Mary conceived and bore God the Son, it's more accurate for us to say that God has always had a mother in his ever present conception of her. God's idea of anyone or any created thing belongs to the order of final causality and never ceases to exist or comes into being as part of the eternal divine essence.

She only became the mother of Christ in the flesh, after Christ came into the world as a HUMAN BEING.

Mary became the mother of Christ in time to our knowledge when she conceived and bore a divine Person - God the Son. Our Lord's physiological constitution is an attribute of his in his assumed humanity. Mothers do not bear attributes, but entire individual persons. And a human being is a composite of body and soul. Mary's Son is a divine person who possesses a divine and a human nature in unity. As an individual person in the flesh, he is both perfect God and perfect man: the divinity with a rational soul. The Person whom Mary has borne possesses a divine and a human mind, and a divine and a human will. The former is through the Holy Spirit - the active generative principle of the Son of Man - and the latter is through Mary - the passive generative principle. If Mary weren't the mother of God, the second Person of the Holy Trinity, then Jesus could not be a divine person. And like I said, mothers give birth to entire individual persons, not their natures, although they make a contribution in providing a person's human attributes.

Just because the LORD knows each and everyone of us and set us apart before we are even born (Jeremiah 1:5, Psalm 139), does not mean that we already were in existence long before being actually born.

Anyone or anything can always exist in the mind of God before being created.

Before Christ came into the world, before He became flesh, He had no mother! He is the LORD from everlasting, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the End..:bow::bow:

Flattery will get you nowhere. ;)

I'm not sure I follow what you are trying to say here? Are you by any chance trying to claim that Mary's role in God's plan was significantly greater than Abraham's, or are you simply downplaying Abraham? Or is it both?

We both agree that the promise made to Abraham was fulfilled in Christ and him alone. But in order for the promise to be fulfilled, he had to be born of a woman (Gal 4:4) and her seed. God was not referring to Abraham when he spoke to the serpent in the garden at the time of the Fall and said: "I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed." God was alluding to Mary, not Abraham, in light of Eve's transgression. Jesus acknowledged his mother to be the free woman of promise foretold by God himself when he called her "Woman" at the beginning and the end of his public ministry. She has always been perceived as an anti-type of Eve and a type of daughter Zion, Israel, from earliest times. This is evident in her Canticle of Praise. I am not downplaying Abraham in his key role in God's plan of salvation, but Mary's role was the greater one, for through it the promise made to our father of faith was fulfilled.

Christ is the fruit of Mary's womb > Christ is the seed of Abraham
Is this what you are trying to imply?:confused:

Christ is Mary's offspring descended from Abraham through bloodline.

Others say that Christ (and not Mary) is the ark of the New Covenant), due to several reasons. Some being:

-Romans 3:25

-John 1:14 says "the word became flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory." In the Greek the word dwelt is "skeinoo" from the Hebrew word "shekinah" which was the word for "God residing in the Tabernacle." Jesus clothed himself in human flesh (Phil 2:5-8) the ark was His body as it had carried the Creator of the universe. It was not Mary who was the ark, but Jesus Christ's body that was the Tabernacle.

It would appear both are from different perspectives.

So, if Mary had be sinless to be "worthy" of bearing the only begotten Son of God who had no sin in Him, doesn't it mean that Mary's mother had to be sinless as well (to be able to bear Mary)?

Not at all. Mary wasn't a divine person. Jesus was holy by divine nature, through which his human nature was graced. Mary had a human nature supernaturally transformed by God's intervening grace. The graces the Son of Man received were not by divine intervention, but flowed through him because of his divine nature, which he possessed in unity with his human nature as an individual person.

By the way, the ethnic ancestry of Christ is traced through Joseph and not Mary.

In the sixth month of Elizabeth’s pregnancy, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.”
Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary; you have found favor with God. You will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to call him Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end.”

“How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?”

The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come on you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God." Luke 1:26-35 [/quote]

Formally as required, the father's name was used in a genealogy among the Jews. But we both know that Joseph wasn't our Lord's real father. Jesus could only trace his ancestry by bloodline through Mary who, not unlike Joseph, was a descendant of David. The Lord swore an oath to David in truth, he will never turn back from it: "Your own offspring I will set upon your throne." (Ps 132:11). If we look at Luke's genealogy of Jesus, we will find that it is Joseph's father-in-law - Mary's father - who precedes him in the list of male ancestors and descendants. Call it a loophole. :D

That woman mentioned in that above passage is NOT Mary, but Israel. The devil is at war with the REMNANT of Israel:

A great sign appeared in heaven: a woman clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head. She was pregnant and cried out in pain as she was about to give birth. Then another sign appeared in heaven: an enormous red dragon with seven heads and ten horns and seven crowns on its heads. Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth. The dragon stood in front of the woman who was about to give birth, so that it might devour her child the moment he was born. She gave birth to a son, a male child, who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter.” And her child was snatched up to God and to his throne. Revelation 12:1-5

While it is true that Mary gave birth to Jesus, it is also true that Jesus, the son of David from the tribe of Judah, came from Israel. In a sense, Israel gave birth—or brought forth—Christ Jesus.

Then he had another dream, and he told it to his brothers. “Listen,” he said, “I had another dream, and this time the sun and moon and eleven stars were bowing down to me.”

When he told his father as well as his brothers, his father rebuked him and said, “What is this dream you had? Will your mother and I and your brothers actually come and bow down to the ground before you?” His brothers were jealous of him, but his father kept the matter in mind. Genesis 37:9-11

Joseph was one of the twelve sons of Israel. From his dream we are shown that the sun, the moon, and the twelve stars represent Israel and his family. Israel – formerly called Jacob – had twelve sons from which emerge the twelve tribes of Israel. And it is through Israel’s seed that God promises to bring forth His Son – the Messiah – Jesus Christ.

The symbolism in the Apocalypse is polyvalent. So the woman can represent either Israel, the Church, or Mary in different aspects. The last Book embraces both the Old and the New Testament appearing to sum up everything that is or shall be revealed, however cryptically.

As long as it is found in the Scriptures, that is fine by me.:)

" If I do not find it in the Scriptures, I will not believe the Gospel, and on my saying to them, It is wriiten, they answered me, That remains to be proved."
St. Ignatius of Antioch (c.A.D. 110)

It isn't a question of finding, but seeing. The Scriptures must also be read in a spiritual sense to understand what God has done and revealed.

"For how should it be if the apostles themelves had not left us their writings? Would it not be necessary to follow the course of the tradition which they handed down to those whom they did commit the Churches?"
St. Irenaeus (A.D. 188)

PAX
:angel:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Mary was used of God to give birth to Jesus the Christ. He was her Savior, as He was with all else who embraced Him as theirs. He died on the cross for Mary, covering her sins with his blood as anyone else.

"I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham."
Matthew 3, 9

God could very well have raised up the Son of Man from one of these stones to be a true descendant of Abraham, just as he had formed Adam out of clay (Gen 2:7). But instead God willed that Jesus be "made of a woman" (Gal 4:4). Mary wasn't merely used as a biological instrument in the hands of God her loving Father. She had a far greater role to play in the Redemption than just give birth on account of Eve's transgression. The quintessence of Mary's participation can be found in her own words addressed to the angel Gabriel: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word."

"Rather blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it."
Luke 11, 28

Mary was not the mother of God. No one gave birth to God. She was the female human God used to give birth to Jesus Christ, to fulfill the prophesy (to reconcile the world to Himself).

God's deeds are not determined by prophecies. Rather the fulfillment of prophecies are determined by God. That Mary was not the mother of God is not what the angel Gabriel meant when he spoke to Mary.

And the angel answered and said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God."
Luke 1, 35 [KJV]

If Mary was "sinless". it is she who would've died on the cross for the sins of the world, and would've been called the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world, and would've been God the Father, incarnate, called Emmanuel, God is with us. there would've been no need for God to send His only begotten Son to the world, as it is written in this verse:

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." ~John 3:16

"Therefore you are to be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect."
Matthew 5, 48

Our Lord concludes his sermon on the mount by exhorting us to be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect, meaning that we should emulate God's holiness in our lives to best of our ability with the assistance of divine grace. We should strive towards divine perfection as is ontologically possible for us to do with the help of God's grace, which without our human natures cannot be supernaturally transformed or an interior righteousness (the internal state of sanctification) cannot be attained. By being perfect as God our Father is perfect is to be like God, as exemplified and spoken by him through his incarnation in the person of the Son - not the Father: humble, just, merciful, pure of heart, and above all charitable. Mary could have atoned for our sins only if she had been sinless by nature. But unlike Jesus, she was sinless by God's intervening grace which efficaciously infused her human soul and ontologically transformed her human nature so that it could partake of the divne life while remaining human. By freely cooperating with God's sanctifying grace, we can make ourselves pure as Jesus was pure in his humanity (1 John 3:3). St. Athanasius teaches us that God gave himself to us through his Spirit. By the participation of the Spirit, we become communicants of the divine nature. Those in whom the Spirit dwells are divinized. In Christ "we are a new creation"; "the old has passed away." All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself (2 Cor 5:17-18).

"For he was made man that we might be made God."
St. Athanasius, Incarnation 54 (A.D. 318)

And I will give you a new heart, and put a new spirit within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and will give you a heart of flesh ... and I will cause you to walk in my commandments, and to keep my judgments, and do them ... And I will save you from all your uncleannesses.
Ezekiel 36, 26-27, 29



... He also did not intend for anyone to worship her, for if she was indeed sinless, that's what one would do...worship her.

Honour and veneration are not synonymous with worship which rightfully belongs to God alone. But we are to honour and venerate where honour and veneration are called for, for God by his grace is the source of all honour and veneration we give to the Saints, who without God's grace could have done nothing. By honouring and venerating the saints, we glorify God who is their craftsman. "We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus in good works, which God hath prepared that we should walk in them." (Eph 2:10).

It is written that only the spotless Lamb of God is worthy, Who has taken away the sins of the world.

Whose adorning let it not be the outward plaiting of the hair, or the wearing of gold, or the putting on of apparel: But the hidden man of the heart in the incorruptibility of a quiet and meek spirit, which is worthy in the sight of God.
1 Peter 3, 3-4

Mary cannot save any of us, not even herself. She is who she is. A sinner, in need of God's grace, just like any of us, amen?

Mary was subject to inheriting the stain of sin as a descendant of Adam, and so God made her sinless by the power of his grace at the first instance of her conception when he sanctified her soul. God exempted her from being deprived of the original state of holiness and justice forfeited by Adam and Eve. And he preserved her free from the sinful effects of original sin.

God is Who He is. He will share His glory with none other:

God is glorified in his saints.

PAX
:angel:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
"I tell you that out of these stones God can raise up children for Abraham."
Matthew 3, 9

God could very well have raised up the Son of Man from one of these stones to be a true descendant of Abraham, just as he had formed Adam out of clay (Gen 2:7). But instead God willed that Jesus be "made of a woman" (Gal 4:4). Mary wasn't merely used as a biological instrument in the hands of God her loving Father. She had a far greater role to play in the Redemption than just give birth on account of Eve's transgression. The quintessence of Mary's participation can be found in her own words addressed to the angel Gabriel: "Behold the handmaid of the Lord. Let it be done to me according to your word."

"Rather blessed are those who hear the word of God and keep it."
Luke 11, 28



God's deeds are not determined by prophecies. Rather the fulfillment of prophecies are determined by God. That Mary was not the mother of God is not what the angel Gabriel meant when he said to Mary.

And the angel answered and said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you; therefore, also, that Holy One who is to be born will be called the Son of God."
Luke 1, 35 [KJV]



"Therefore you are to be perfect as your heavenly Father is perfect."
Matthew 5, 48

Our Lord concludes his sermon on the mount by exhorting us to be perfect as our heavenly Father is perfect, meaning that we should emulate God's holiness in our lives to best of our ability with the assistance of divine grace. We should strive towards divine perfection as is ontologically possible for us to do with the help of God's grace, which without our human natures cannot be supernaturally transformed or an interior righteousness (the internal state of sanctification) cannot be attained. By being perfect as God our Father is perfect is to be like God, as exemplified and spoken by him through his incarnation in the person of the Son - not the Father: humble, just, merciful, pure of heart, and above all charitable. Mary could have atoned for our sins only if she had been sinless by nature. But unlike Jesus, she was sinless by God's intervening grace which efficaciously infused her human soul and ontologically transformed her human nature so that it could partake of the divne life while remaining human. By freely cooperating with God's sanctifying grace, we can make ourselves pure as Jesus was pure in his humanity (1 John 3:3). St. Athanasius teaches us that God gave himself to us through his Spirit. By the participation of the Spirit, we become communicants of the divine nature. Those in whom the Spirit dwells are divinized. In Christ "we are a new creation"; "the old has passed away." All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself (2 Cor 5:17-18).

"For he was made man that we might be made God."
St. Athanasius, Incarnation 54 (A.D. 318)

And I will give you a new heart, and put a new spirit within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and will give you a heart of flesh ... and I will cause you to walk in my commandments, and to keep my judgments, and do them ... And I will save you from all your uncleannesses.
Ezekiel 36, 26-27, 29





Honour and veneration are not synonymous with worship which rightfully belongs to God alone. But we are to honour and venerate where honour and veneration are called for, for God by his grace is the source of all honour and veneration we give to the Saints, who without God's grace could have done nothing. By honouring and venerating the saints, we glorify God who is their craftsman. "We are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus in good works, which God hath prepared that we should walk in them." (Eph 2:10).



Whose adorning let it not be the outward plaiting of the hair, or the wearing of gold, or the putting on of apparel: But the hidden man of the heart in the incorruptibility of a quiet and meek spirit, which is worthy in the sight of God.
1 Peter 3, 3-4



Mary was subject to inheriting the stain of sin as a descendant of Adam, and so God made her sinless by the power of his grace at the first instance of her conception when he sanctified her soul. God exempted her form being deprived of the original state of holiness and justice forfeited by Adam and Eve. And he preserved her free from the sinful effects of original sin.



God is glorified in his saints.

PAX
:angel:

God is the focus of our adoration and worship and His only begotten Son, Who sits at the right hand of God the Father. It is written that every knee shall bow, and confess that He is the Lord of lords and King of kings. this includes Mary,who, if she is redeemed, bows her knee and worships God's only begotten Son as Lord of lords and King of kings.

Jesus Himself said:

"46While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." ~Matthew 12:46-50

"And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God" ~Luke 18:18-19
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
God is the focus of our adoration and worship and His only begotten Son, Who sits at the right hand of God the Father. It is written that every knee shall bow, and confess that He is the Lord of lords and King of kings. this includes Mary,who, if she is redeemed, bows her knee and worships God's only begotten Son as Lord of lords and King of kings.

Christians who venerate and honour Mary and the saints do not adore and worship them as they do only God. They adore God as their supreme Lord, and they honour the saints as his faithful servants and friends. God is adored for his own sake, and the saints are venerated for the gifts and prerogatives God has endowed them with. The most perfect form of veneration consists in trying to imiate their virtues by following their examples.

Now I will praise those godly men, our ancestors, each in his own time: The abounding glory of the Most High's portion, his own part, since the days of old.
Sirach 44, 1-2

Yet these also were godly men whose virtues have not been forgotten; Their wealth remains with their families, their heritage with their desendants; Through God's covenant with them their family endures, their posterity, for their sake. And for all time their progeny will endure, their glory will never be blotted out; Their bodies are peacefully laid away, but their name lives on and on. At gatherings their wisdom is retold, and the assembly proclaims their praise.
Sirach 44, 10-15

Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ.
1 Corinthians 11, 1

Jesus Himself said:

"46While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." ~Matthew 12:46-50

Note, in v.46 Matthew writes "behold his mother". This is rather odd if the evangelist shared your conviction. Let us not dissect Jesus into two persons: one divine and the other human. The possessive pronoun refers to an individual person, the one whom Mary bore. I doubt Matthew would have regarded Mary as the mother of Jesus if our Lord hadn't regarded Mary to be his genuine mother.

"And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God" ~Luke 18:18-19

By a literal reading of the text, one would have to logically conclude that not even Jesus was good; nor that he was a divine person in the flesh. So naturally you misinterpret the meaning of his words. Given the context, Jesus was trying to raise the people's idea of the expected Messiah, so that they would recognize him in his own person for the right reason. His question is rhetorical and intended to draw their attention to his goodness which comes from the Father. Without any further clarification, Jesus is asserting that he is from the Father, and the good they see in him rests on the fact that he is light from light and true God from true God. The people had no idea that Jesus was a divine person in the flesh, so he means to tell them in less words that the source of goodness in man is God himself by his grace without which we cannot keep the commandments (v.19 or 20).

"Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on my own. The Father who dwells in me is doing his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else, believe because of the works themselves. Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever believes in me will do the works that I do, and will do greater ones than these, because I am going to the Father."
John 14, 10-12

Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is there is, freedom. All of us gazing with unveiled face on the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as from the Lord who is the Spirit.
2 Corinthians 3, 17-18

Therefore, we are not discouraged; rather, although our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day.
2 Corinthians 4, 16

So whoever is in Christ is a new creation; the old things have passed away; behold new things have come.
2 Corinthians 5, 17

You should put away the old self of your former way of life, corrupted through deceitful desires, and be renewed in the spirit of your minds, and put on the new self, created in God's way in righteousness and holiness of truth.
Ephesians 4, 22-24

"So likewise men, if they do truly progress by faith towards better things, and receive the Spirit of God, and bring forth the fruit thereof, shall be spiritual, as being planted in the paradise of God."
St. Irenaeus (A.D. 180)

PAX
:angel:
 
Upvote 0

GregTraver

Newbie
Dec 23, 2011
1
0
✟7,611.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
One can always come up with an emotionally (or Ego) based, warm and fuzzy idea that we find comforting and good, but in the end they are only humanistic ideas.
A good rule of thumb that was shared with me is to always use the scriptures in their entirety to assist in the discernment of a thing.
We are told that, "All (as in everyone) have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God and "There is NONE righteous - no not one."
The Bible says that, "Mary was highly favored" I think that is high enough praise to give any individual person, without having to ascribe any further attributes.
Lastly, the Focus is always to be the redemptive work of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, the only Son of God. "Everything else is window dressing" IMHO.
 
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,490
✟1,343,246.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Christians who venerate and honour Mary and the saints do not adore and worship them as they do only God. They adore God as their supreme Lord, and they honour the saints as his faithful servants and friends. God is adored for his own sake, and the saints are venerated for the gifts and prerogatives God has endowed them with. The most perfect form of veneration consists in trying to imiate their virtues by following their examples.

Now I will praise those godly men, our ancestors, each in his own time: The abounding glory of the Most High's portion, his own part, since the days of old.
Sirach 44, 1-2

Yet these also were godly men whose virtues have not been forgotten; Their wealth remains with their families, their heritage with their desendants; Through God's covenant with them their family endures, their posterity, for their sake. And for all time their progeny will endure, their glory will never be blotted out; Their bodies are peacefully laid away, but their name lives on and on. At gatherings their wisdom is retold, and the assembly proclaims their praise.
Sirach 44, 10-15

Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ.
1 Corinthians 11, 1



Note, in v.46 Matthew writes "behold his mother". This is rather odd if the evangelist shared your conviction. Let us not dissect Jesus into two persons: one divine and the other human. The possessive pronoun refers to an individual person, the one whom Mary bore. I doubt Matthew would have regarded Mary as the mother of Jesus if our Lord hadn't regarded Mary to be his genuine mother.



By a literal reading of the text, one would have to logically conclude that not even Jesus was good; nor that he was a divine person in the flesh. So naturally you misinterpret the meaning of his words. Given the context, Jesus was trying to raise the people's idea of the expected Messiah, so that they would recognize him in his own person for the right reason. His question is rhetorical and intended to draw their attention to his goodness which comes from the Father. Without any further clarification, Jesus is asserting that he is from the Father, and the good they see in him rests on the fact that he is light from light and true God from true God. The people had no idea that Jesus was a divine person in the flesh, so he means to tell them in less words that the source of goodness in man is God himself by his grace without which we cannot keep the commandments (v.19 or 20).

"Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak on my own. The Father who dwells in me is doing his works. Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me, or else, believe because of the works themselves. Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever believes in me will do the works that I do, and will do greater ones than these, because I am going to the Father."
John 14, 10-12

Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is there is, freedom. All of us gazing with unveiled face on the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from glory to glory, as from the Lord who is the Spirit.
2 Corinthians 3, 17-18

Therefore, we are not discouraged; rather, although our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day.
2 Corinthians 4, 16

So whoever is in Christ is a new creation; the old things have passed away; behold new things have come.
2 Corinthians 5, 17

You should put away the old self of your former way of life, corrupted through deceitful desires, and be renewed in the spirit of your minds, and put on the new self, created in God's way in righteousness and holiness of truth.
Ephesians 4, 22-24

"So likewise men, if they do truly progress by faith towards better things, and receive the Spirit of God, and bring forth the fruit thereof, shall be spiritual, as being planted in the paradise of God."
St. Irenaeus (A.D. 180)

PAX
:angel:

We are to imitate Christ only.
 
Upvote 0

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
We are to imitate Christ only.

I have the impression that you quote me without carefully reading what I write. By imitating the saints, we imitate Christ (1 Cor 11, 1), for the saints have lived their lives in Christ, renewed in the Spirit by the grace of God. They have "put on Christ", as Paul puts its, having made no provision for the flesh to gratify its desires. (Rom 13:14). In other words, they have clothed themseves with a new nature after the image of its creator (Col 3:10), and in the state of sanctifying grace they have partaken of the divine life (2 Pet 1:4). Sanctifying grace cleanses us from sin and unrighteousness, and this cleansing is an actual infused cleansing effective enough to transform us interiorly (1 Jn 1:7,9). The Greek word for "cleanse" in the first Letter of St. John is katharizo. We are not merely shielded by an outer garment placed around us. It is our own righteousness God takes into account when he judges us personally, not that of the Son. The saints have been judged righteous by their "faith working through love" (Gal 5:56). Their righteousness has been obtained by doing what is right (1 Jn 3: 7,10). God has not simply "declared" the martyrs, who have laid down their lives for the love of Christ, righteous and holy by looking at the righteousness and holiness of the Son. The fine linen they are clothed in belongs to them. And so we honour them for their virtues in the grace of God, for they are clothed in the love of Christ - not covered by it exteriorly. I'm afraid you underestimate the efficacy of divine grace and its power to transform our interior selves. It was by the grace of God that the martyrs merited the reward of eternal life by shedding their blood for the One who had shed his blood for them in mutual love. I believe God desires that we honour them for their steadfast faith and moral courage. The early Christians certainly did.

After this I saw a great multitude, which no man can number, of all nations, and tribes, and peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne, and in sight of the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands. These are they who have come out of the great tribulation, and have washed their robes in the blood of the Lamb.
Revelation 7, 9, 14

"That it is neither possible for us ever to forsake Christ, who suffered for the salvation of such as shall be saved throughout the whole world (the blameless one for sinners), nor to worship any other. For Him indeed, as being the Son of God, we adore; but the martyrs, as disciples and followers of the Lord, we worthily love on account of their extraordinary affection towards their own King and Master, of whom we may also be made companions and fellow disciples! The centurion then, seeing the strife by the Jews, placed the body in the midst of the fire, and consumed it. Accordingly, we afterwards took up his bones, as being more precious than the most exquisite jewels, and more purified than gold, and deposited them in a fitting place, whither, being gathered together, as opportunity is allowed us, with joy and rejoicing, the Lord shall grant us to celebrate the anniversary of his martyrdom, both in memory of those who have finished the course, and for the exercising and preparation of those yet to walk in their steps."
Martyrdom of Polycarp (Bishop), 17, 18 (A.D. 157)

By walking in the steps of the saints and martyrs, we follow the footsteps of Christ together with them. And among all the saints, the Queen of Martyrs is the model par excellence (Lk 2:35).

"If the world hates you, you know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you."
John 15, 18-19

PAX
:angel:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,750
1,265
✟330,308.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We are to imitate Christ only.

A great example of creating an either/or constraint where a both/and is not only appropriate but scriptural to boot. How many examples do you need to show you that your thinking here does not align with Scripture?

1 Cortinthians 4
14: I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. 15: For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel. 16: I urge you, then, be imitators of me. 17: Therefore I sent to you Timothy, my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, to remind you of my ways in Christ, as I teach them everywhere in every church.

1 Corinthians 11
1: Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ. 2: I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you.

Philippians 3
17: Brethren, join in imitating me, and mark those who so live as you have an example in us.

1 Thessalonians 1
2: We give thanks to God always for you all, constantly mentioning you in our prayers, 3: remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ. 4: For we know, brethren beloved by God, that he has chosen you; 5: for our gospel came to you not only in word, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction. You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. 6: And you became imitators of us and of the Lord, for you received the word in much affliction, with joy inspired by the Holy Spirit;

1 Thessalonians 2
13: And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers. 14: For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus which are in Judea; for you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews,

2 Thessalonians 3
6: Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is living in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. 7: For you yourselves know how you ought to imitate us; we were not idle when we were with you, 8: we did not eat any one's bread without paying, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not burden any of you. 9: It was not because we have not that right, but to give you in our conduct an example to imitate.

1 Timothy 4
11: Command and teach these things. 12: Let no one despise your youth, but set the believers an example in speech and conduct, in love, in faith, in purity. 13: Till I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. 14: Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders laid their hands upon you.

Hebrew 6
11: And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope until the end, 12: so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.

Hebrews 13
7: Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God; consider the outcome of their life, and imitate their faith.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

jackmt

Newbie
Dec 10, 2011
972
23
Missoula Montana
✟16,271.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A great example of creating an either/or constraint where a both/and is not only appropriate but scriptural to boot. How many examples do you need to show you that your thinking here does not align with Scripture?

1 Cortinthians 4
14: I do not write this to make you ashamed, but to admonish you as my beloved children. 15: For though you have countless guides in Christ, you do not have many fathers. For I became your father in Christ Jesus through the gospel. 16: I urge you, then, be imitators of me. 17: Therefore I sent to you Timothy, my beloved and faithful child in the Lord, to remind you of my ways in Christ, as I teach them everywhere in every church.

1 Corinthians 11
1: Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ. 2: I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you.

Philippians 3
17: Brethren, join in imitating me, and mark those who so live as you have an example in us.

1 Thessalonians 1
2: We give thanks to God always for you all, constantly mentioning you in our prayers, 3: remembering before our God and Father your work of faith and labor of love and steadfastness of hope in our Lord Jesus Christ. 4: For we know, brethren beloved by God, that he has chosen you; 5: for our gospel came to you not only in word, but also in power and in the Holy Spirit and with full conviction. You know what kind of men we proved to be among you for your sake. 6: And you became imitators of us and of the Lord, for you received the word in much affliction, with joy inspired by the Holy Spirit;

1 Thessalonians 2
13: And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers. 14: For you, brethren, became imitators of the churches of God in Christ Jesus which are in Judea; for you suffered the same things from your own countrymen as they did from the Jews,

2 Thessalonians 3
6: Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you keep away from any brother who is living in idleness and not in accord with the tradition that you received from us. 7: For you yourselves know how you ought to imitate us; we were not idle when we were with you, 8: we did not eat any one's bread without paying, but with toil and labor we worked night and day, that we might not burden any of you. 9: It was not because we have not that right, but to give you in our conduct an example to imitate.

1 Timothy 4
11: Command and teach these things. 12: Let no one despise your youth, but set the believers an example in speech and conduct, in love, in faith, in purity. 13: Till I come, attend to the public reading of scripture, to preaching, to teaching. 14: Do not neglect the gift you have, which was given you by prophetic utterance when the council of elders laid their hands upon you.

Hebrew 6
11: And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope until the end, 12: so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.

Hebrews 13
7: Remember your leaders, those who spoke to you the word of God; consider the outcome of their life, and imitate their faith.

We are to be imitators of those here on earth only insofar as they are imitating Christ. Nowhere in your citations do I read about imitating those who have passed. I realize that those in your citations have passed, so we are only able to imitate those things they did on earth and only insofar as they followed Christ, and then only insofar as we have a biblical record of their acts. So we are back to knowing Christ, and imitating Him and those who we know from Scripture to have been carrying out His will, giving examples of how to live with Christ in us and the Holy Spirit guiding us. We cannot imitate the acts of those who are in heaven, for we have no way of knowing specifically what those acts are. Those we do know about generically, we already have examples from those acts done here on earth.
 
Upvote 0

narnia59

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jul 17, 2007
5,750
1,265
✟330,308.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We are to be imitators of those here on earth only insofar as they are imitating Christ. Nowhere in your citations do I read about imitating those who have passed. I realize that those in your citations have passed, so we are only able to imitate those things they did on earth and only insofar as they followed Christ, and then only insofar as we have a biblical record of their acts. So we are back to knowing Christ, and imitating Him and those who we know from Scripture to have been carrying out His will, giving examples of how to live with Christ in us and the Holy Spirit guiding us. We cannot imitate the acts of those who are in heaven, for we have no way of knowing specifically what those acts are. Those we do know about generically, we already have examples from those acts done here on earth.

Hebrews 6, in context is referring to imitating the faith of Abraham, who was long since dead:

11 And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope until the end, 12 so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises. 13 For when God made a promise to Abraham, since he had no one greater by whom to swear, he swore by himself, 14 saying, "Surely I will bless you and multiply you." 15 And thus Abraham, having patiently endured, obtained the promise.

So yes, we're told in Scripture to imitate those who have gone before us and kept the faith, even though they're dead.

We have many way of knowing the acts of those who have died in Christ -- there are many biographies of the saints written by the testimony of the church that tell us about their lives and their faith. Would you suggest that because their lives are not recorded in Scripture we should forget about them and they're not worth imitating? So all those early Christian martyrs who were willing to be tortured and die rather than forsake Christ -- their faith should be forgotten and is not worth imitating? We shouldn't teach our children their stories and hold them up as examples? Is that what you are suggesting? What about the martyrs who died last year? 10 years ago? At what point in time does it become inappropriate to cease telling their stories of faith and holding them up as examples?

I remember as a child being greatly touched by reading the stories of Corrie Ten Boom and her family as they helped Jews hide from the Nazis and ultimately ended up in concentration camps where all died but Corrie. They weren't Catholic, but I still had the good sense to realize these were Christians whose lives were worth learning about and imitating. I loaned somebody one of her books just recently. I suppose I should have said but oh, she's dead now so don't bother -- nothing to learn from her. :doh:
 
Upvote 0

jackmt

Newbie
Dec 10, 2011
972
23
Missoula Montana
✟16,271.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hebrews 6, in context is referring to imitating the faith of Abraham, who was long since dead:

11 And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope until the end, 12 so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises. 13 For when God made a promise to Abraham, since he had no one greater by whom to swear, he swore by himself, 14 saying, "Surely I will bless you and multiply you." 15 And thus Abraham, having patiently endured, obtained the promise.

So yes, we're told in Scripture to imitate those who have gone before us and kept the faith, even though they're dead.

We have many way of knowing the acts of those who have died in Christ -- there are many biographies of the saints written by the testimony of the church that tell us about their lives and their faith. Would you suggest that because their lives are not recorded in Scripture we should forget about them and they're not worth imitating? So all those early Christian martyrs who were willing to be tortured and die rather than forsake Christ -- their faith should be forgotten and is not worth imitating? We shouldn't teach our children their stories and hold them up as examples? Is that what you are suggesting? What about the martyrs who died last year? 10 years ago? At what point in time does it become inappropriate to cease telling their stories of faith and holding them up as examples?

I remember as a child being greatly touched by reading the stories of Corrie Ten Boom and her family as they helped Jews hide from the Nazis and ultimately ended up in concentration camps where all died but Corrie. They weren't Catholic, but I still had the good sense to realize these were Christians whose lives were worth learning about and imitating. I loaned somebody one of her books just recently. I suppose I should have said but oh, she's dead now so don't bother -- nothing to learn from her. :doh:

We are to imitate others only insofar as they imitate Christ. We ought not decide for and by ourselves what we deem to be worthy of imitation. Nor should we depend on the decree of anyone who puts tradition above Scripture that these lives are to be followed. We may see or read of their deeds here on earth and compare them to Scripture to see that they are right and righteous (the deeds). But if we follow a "saint" blindly because the RCC has determined he merited "sainthood" we will inevitably follow him into error, for he is/was imperfect mortal, sinful flesh.

More to the point of the recent postings in this thread is that even in imitation of those gone before, we can only imitate the deeds they did on earth. And we should only imitate those deeds that we can verify as being in line with Scriptural teachings. Certainly we should not imitate the deeds of "righteous Lot" in all he did. Nor of Peter in his Judaizing or in his denials of Christ, or his rashness of behavior. They are examples of what not to do.

Further, we cannot know of the specific deeds of those in heaven beyond what Scripture tells us.

The RCC goes far beyond what Scripture tells us, and so tends to lead into error.

BTW, what is the difference between RCC saints and Protestant (I hate that term; I am not Protestant, but Christian) saints?
Protestants saints include the living.;)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

justinangel

Newbie
Feb 19, 2011
1,301
197
Btwn heaven & earth
✟13,949.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Conservatives
We are to imitate others only insofar as they imitate Christ.

That's what we Catholics have been telling you all along. :confused:

We ought not decide for and by ourselves what we deem to be worthy of imitation. Nor should we depend on the decree of anyone who puts tradition above Scripture that these lives are to be followed. We may see or read of their deeds here on earth and compare them to Scripture to see that they are right and righteous (the deeds).

Scripture and Tradition complement each other, and so the two musn't be divorced from the other or set at odds with one another. The saints are canonized in view of both infallible mediums of divine revelation. And although Scripture is the objective norm to go by, it is the "Catholic" Church which has the final authority to declare (the power to bind and loose) someone a saint.

But if we follow a "saint" blindly because the RCC has determined he merited "sainthood" we will inevitably follow him into error, for he is/was imperfect mortal, sinful flesh.

Paul exhorted the Corinthians to imitate him, as he also imitated Christ. But not unlike any saint before or after him, he struggled with temptation because of a wounded, sinful human nature (Rom 7:15). Are you proposing that we err by imitating the apostle? Naturally we don't imitate any saint in his vices, but in his infused moral virtues.

Blessed the man who finds refuge in you,
in their hearts are pilgrim roads.
As they pass through the Baca valley,
they find spring water to drink.
The early rain covers it with blessings.
They will go from strength to strength
and see the God of gods on Zion.
Psalm 84, 6-8

More to the point of the recent postings in this thread is that even in imitation of those gone before, we can only imitate the deeds they did on earth.

Has anyone said that we are to imitate how the saints behave in heaven? :confused: However, we do emulate them in their heavenly praise when we sing hymns during services of worship. :holy:


And we should only imitate those deeds that we can verify as being in line with Scriptural teachings. Certainly we should not imitate the deeds of "righteous Lot" in all he did. Nor of Peter in his Judaizing or in his denials of Christ, or his rashness of behavior. They are examples of what not to do.

Nor should we follow Judas' example, and he's no saint. ;)

Further, we cannot know of the specific deeds of those in heaven beyond what Scripture tells us.

We have extra-biblical sources of the deeds of Christian martyrs, for example, during the great Roman persecutions. Their acts reflected the Gospel.

The RCC goes far beyond what Scripture tells us, and so tends to lead into error.

Care to elaborate? You seem to insinuate that the Catholic Church venerates the saints for their ungodly behaviour.

BTW, what is the difference between RCC saints and Protestant (I hate that term; I am not Protestant, but Christian) saints?
Protestants saints include the living.;)

In principle there is no difference between them, just as there is no difference between a godly Christian and godly non-Christian. Catholic saints include both the living and the dead who are alive in Christ as fruitful members of the vine. The departed saints are even more alive than the ones on earth are and more powerful as prayer warriors who participate in Christ's intercession. For sin no longer has any hold on them, and they have received their glorious crowns.

His master replied, "Well done, my good and faithful servant! You have been faithful with a few things. I will put you in charge of many things. Come and share your master's happiness."
Matthew 25, 23

"Only may that power come upon us which strengthens weakness, through the prayers of him [St. Paul] who made his own strength perfect in bodily weakness."
St. Gregory of Nyssa (A.D. 380)

PAX
:angel:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0