THE ARGUMENT FROM TESTIMONY
1) AS TO THE NUMBER OF THE WITNESSES
The resurrection of Christ as a historical fact is verified by a sufficient number of witnesses: over five hundred (1 Corinthians 15:3-9). In our courts, one witness is enough to establish murder; two, high treason; three, the execution of a will, seven, an oral will. Seven is the greatest number required under our law. Christ's resurrection had 514. Is not this a sufficient number?
2) AS TO THE CHARACTER OF THE WITNESSES
The value of the testimony of a witness depends much upon his character; if that is impeached, then the testimony is discounted. Scrutinize carefully the character of the men who bore witness to the fact of Christ's resurrection. Impeach them if you can. They are unassailable on ethical grounds. "No honorable opponent of the Gospel has ever denied this fact. Their moral greatness awakened an Augustin, a Francis of Assisi, and a Luther. They have been the unrivalled pattern of all mature and moral manhood for nearly two thousand years. " In law much is made of the question of motive. what motive could the apostles have had in perpetrating the story of Christ' resurrection upon people? Every one of them (except one) died a martyr's death for his loyalty to the story of Christ's resurrection. What had they to gain by fraud? Would they have sacrificed their lives for what they themselves believed to be an imposture?
Nor are we to slight the testimony to Christ's resurrection that comes to us from sources other than that of the inspired writers of the New Testament: Ignatius, a Christian, and a contemporary of Christ, a martyr for his faith in Christ, in his Letter to the Philadelphians, says: "Christ truly suffered, as He also truly raised up Himself. I know that after the resurrection He was in the flesh, and I believe Him to be so still. And when He came to those who were with Peter, He said to them, "Take, handle me, and see that I am not an incorporeal phantom!" "Tertullian, in his Apolegeticus says, "The fame of our Lord's remarkable resurrection and ascension being now spread abroad, Pontius Pilate, according to an ancient custom of communicating novel occurrences to the emperor, that nothing might escape him, transmitted to Tiberius, Emperor of Rome, an account of the resurrection of our Lord from the dead....Tiberius referred the whole matter to the Senate, who, being unacquainted with the facts ,rejected it." The integrity of this passage is unquestioned by even the most skeptical critics.
1) AS TO THE NUMBER OF THE WITNESSES
The resurrection of Christ as a historical fact is verified by a sufficient number of witnesses: over five hundred (1 Corinthians 15:3-9). In our courts, one witness is enough to establish murder; two, high treason; three, the execution of a will, seven, an oral will. Seven is the greatest number required under our law. Christ's resurrection had 514. Is not this a sufficient number?
2) AS TO THE CHARACTER OF THE WITNESSES
The value of the testimony of a witness depends much upon his character; if that is impeached, then the testimony is discounted. Scrutinize carefully the character of the men who bore witness to the fact of Christ's resurrection. Impeach them if you can. They are unassailable on ethical grounds. "No honorable opponent of the Gospel has ever denied this fact. Their moral greatness awakened an Augustin, a Francis of Assisi, and a Luther. They have been the unrivalled pattern of all mature and moral manhood for nearly two thousand years. " In law much is made of the question of motive. what motive could the apostles have had in perpetrating the story of Christ' resurrection upon people? Every one of them (except one) died a martyr's death for his loyalty to the story of Christ's resurrection. What had they to gain by fraud? Would they have sacrificed their lives for what they themselves believed to be an imposture?
Nor are we to slight the testimony to Christ's resurrection that comes to us from sources other than that of the inspired writers of the New Testament: Ignatius, a Christian, and a contemporary of Christ, a martyr for his faith in Christ, in his Letter to the Philadelphians, says: "Christ truly suffered, as He also truly raised up Himself. I know that after the resurrection He was in the flesh, and I believe Him to be so still. And when He came to those who were with Peter, He said to them, "Take, handle me, and see that I am not an incorporeal phantom!" "Tertullian, in his Apolegeticus says, "The fame of our Lord's remarkable resurrection and ascension being now spread abroad, Pontius Pilate, according to an ancient custom of communicating novel occurrences to the emperor, that nothing might escape him, transmitted to Tiberius, Emperor of Rome, an account of the resurrection of our Lord from the dead....Tiberius referred the whole matter to the Senate, who, being unacquainted with the facts ,rejected it." The integrity of this passage is unquestioned by even the most skeptical critics.
Upvote
0