How to Spot Additions to the Text

cybrwurm

Spawn of Epicurus
Feb 6, 2012
47
1
Skyrim
Visit site
✟15,172.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Please examine carefully the following passage from the writings
of the prophet Paulos of Damascus:
.
"So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any incentive of love,
any participation in the Spirit, any affection and sympathy, complete
my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full
accord and of one mind. Do nothing from selfishness or conceit, but
in humility count others better than yourselves. Let each of you look
not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.
Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus.
Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only
as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own
salvation with fear and trembling; for God is at work in you, both to
will and to work for his good pleasure" (RSV).
.
Did you notice anything odd or unusual about this passage? ... No?
Well then, would you say that this passage is a fairly coherent unit?
A single seamless flow of thoughts, perhaps; whereby one statement
leads logically to the next in a simple rational progression of ideas?
... Yes? And would you even go so far as to suppose that all this is
just the way that the author wrote down these thoughts of his?
.
Oh, don't despair now! One can certainly not be blamed for thinking
so ... BUT, the second most interesting thing about this passage is
that it is NOT presented this way in your favorite printed Bible. No
indeed; for according to the accepted canonical format, there is a
whole bunch of verses missing from my presentation. Yes, it's true.
Check out Philippians chapter two for yourself.
.
And this is just one of the many many ways that bible scholars are
able to identify later additions to the original texts! - cybrwurm ;>
 
Last edited:

cybrwurm

Spawn of Epicurus
Feb 6, 2012
47
1
Skyrim
Visit site
✟15,172.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
check out the language, dude. since when does paul talk like a neo-platonist? for textual-critics diction is *very* important. different people use language in different ways. paul does not have the mind of a neo-platonist, ergo he does not use such language to express his theology. He doesn't need to. he's a jewish-theologian, not a philosopher. now if you're willing to accept the fact that paul is not the author of v.5-11, I'd be more than happy to discuss the significance and implications thereof. You go first ... :)
 
Upvote 0

Keachian

On Sabbatical
Feb 3, 2010
7,096
330
35
Horse-lie-down
Visit site
✟23,842.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Whether it belongs there is a different question as to whether Paul is quoting an early Christian hymn (which is the current scholarly reasoning behind the change in diction) I'd be far more at ease going with the current scholarly opinion than your own, that it is not written by Paul is clear from the change in diction, however it is just as easy to understand that Paul is quoting a hymn in order to further stress the idea that we are to follow the example of Christ is clear and incredibly Pauline in nature.
 
Upvote 0

Keachian

On Sabbatical
Feb 3, 2010
7,096
330
35
Horse-lie-down
Visit site
✟23,842.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
<edit>

There is also the view of canonised scripture such that what we have is what is canonised.

I'd also actually be hard pressed to think of the kenosis passage as neo-platonic, it hardly takes from my understanding of neo-platonism and seems to be rather inline with other early christological passages, like for instance John 1: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God ... And the Word became flesh and took up residence among us, and we saw his glory, glory as of the one and only from the Father, full of grace and truth.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Unix
Upvote 0

jbarcher

ANE Social Science Researcher
Aug 25, 2003
6,989
385
Toronto, Ontario
✟10,136.00
Faith
Christian
check out the language, dude. since when does paul talk like a neo-platonist? for textual-critics diction is *very* important. different people use language in different ways. paul does not have the mind of a neo-platonist, ergo he does not use such language to express his theology. He doesn't need to. he's a jewish-theologian, not a philosopher. now if you're willing to accept the fact that paul is not the author of v.5-11, I'd be more than happy to discuss the significance and implications thereof. You go first ... :)

It's a good point that different people use language differently, but this is not a substantiated argument at all. You are arguing based on labels as opposed to empirical evidence. prog's question of manuscript evidence is a legitimate one and it is not persuasive to say "check out the language" when you have not defined any categories for discussion.

I'm also quite unclear as to why you think we can do text criticism from an English translation.
 
Upvote 0

Dale

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Apr 14, 2003
7,175
1,225
71
Sebring, FL
✟663,337.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
check out the language, dude. since when does paul talk like a neo-platonist? for textual-critics diction is *very* important. different people use language in different ways. paul does not have the mind of a neo-platonist, ergo he does not use such language to express his theology. He doesn't need to. he's a jewish-theologian, not a philosopher. now if you're willing to accept the fact that paul is not the author of v.5-11, I'd be more than happy to discuss the significance and implications thereof. You go first ... :)


How do we know the textual critics are always right?


*

*
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

he-man

he-man
Oct 28, 2010
8,891
301
usa
✟90,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Please examine carefully the following passage from the writings
of the prophet Paulos of Damascus:
Php 2:1 "So if there is any encouragement in Christ, any incentive of love, any participation in the Spirit, any affection and sympathy,
Php 2:1 Therefore, if there be any rogation in Christ, if any comfort of love, if any communion of the Spirit, if any bowels of compassion and feelings of compassion,
Php 2:1 &#949;&#953; &#964;&#953;&#962; &#959;&#965;&#957; &#960;&#945;&#961;&#945;&#954;&#955;&#951;&#963;&#953;&#962; &#949;&#957; &#967;&#961;&#953;&#963;&#964;&#969; &#949;&#953; &#964;&#953; &#960;&#945;&#961;&#945;&#956;&#965;&#952;&#953;&#959;&#957; &#945;&#947;&#945;&#960;&#951;&#962; &#949;&#953; &#964;&#953;&#962; &#954;&#959;&#953;&#957;&#969;&#957;&#953;&#945; &#960;&#957;&#949;&#965;&#956;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#962; &#949;&#953; &#964;&#953;&#962; &#963;&#960;&#955;&#945;&#947;&#967;&#957;&#945; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#959;&#953;&#954;&#964;&#953;&#961;&#956;&#959;&#953;

Php 2:2 complete my joy by being of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind.
Php 2:2 Fill up fully my joy, that to be same minded, of the same love, of one thinking, having togetherness with life.
Php 2:2 &#960;&#955;&#951;&#961;&#969;&#963;&#945;&#964;&#949; &#956;&#959;&#965; &#964;&#951;&#957; &#967;&#945;&#961;&#945;&#957; &#953;&#957;&#945; &#964;&#959; &#945;&#965;&#964;&#959; &#966;&#961;&#959;&#957;&#951;&#964;&#949; &#964;&#951;&#957; &#945;&#965;&#964;&#951;&#957; &#945;&#947;&#945;&#960;&#951;&#957; &#949;&#967;&#959;&#957;&#964;&#949;&#962; &#963;&#965;&#956;&#968;&#965;&#967;&#959;&#953; &#964;&#959; &#949;&#957; &#966;&#961;&#959;&#957;&#959;&#965;&#957;&#964;&#949;&#962;

Php 2:3 Do nothing from selfishness or conceit, but in humility count others better than yourselves.
Php 2:3 By no means according to provoking nor also vaingloriousness; but in meekness, to hold others to rise above yourselves.
Php 2:3 &#956;&#951;&#948;&#949;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#964; &#949;&#961;&#953;&#952;&#949;&#953;&#945;&#957; &#956;&#951;&#948;&#949; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#945; &#954;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#948;&#959;&#958;&#953;&#945;&#957; &#945;&#955;&#955;&#945; &#964;&#951; &#964;&#945;&#960;&#949;&#953;&#957;&#959;&#966;&#961;&#959;&#963;&#965;&#957;&#951; &#945;&#955;&#955;&#951;&#955;&#959;&#965;&#962; &#951;&#947;&#959;&#965;&#956;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#953; &#965;&#960;&#949;&#961;&#949;&#967;&#959;&#957;&#964;&#945;&#962; &#949;&#945;&#965;&#964;&#969;&#957;

Php 2:4 Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.
Php 2:4 Not everyone consider his own things, but also everyone the things of others.
Php 2:4 &#956;&#951; &#964;&#945; &#949;&#945;&#965;&#964;&#969;&#957; &#949;&#954;&#945;&#963;&#964;&#959;&#962; &#963;&#954;&#959;&#960;&#959;&#965;&#957;&#964;&#949;&#962; &#945;&#955;&#955;&#945; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#964;&#945; &#949;&#964;&#949;&#961;&#969;&#957; &#949;&#954;&#945;&#963;&#964;&#959;&#953;

Php 2:5 Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus.
Php 2:5 This mind be in you, which was in Christ Jesus also:
Php 2:5 &#964;&#959;&#965;&#964;&#959; &#966;&#961;&#959;&#957;&#949;&#953;&#964;&#949; &#949;&#957; &#965;&#956;&#953;&#957; &#959; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#949;&#957; &#967;&#961;&#953;&#963;&#964;&#969; &#953;&#951;&#963;&#959;&#965;

Php 2:12 Therefore, y beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling;
Php 2:12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
Php 2:12 &#969;&#963;&#964;&#949; &#945;&#947;&#945;&#960;&#951;&#964;&#959;&#953; &#956;&#959;&#965; &#954;&#945;&#952;&#969;&#962; &#960;&#945;&#957;&#964;&#959;&#964;&#949; &#965;&#960;&#951;&#954;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#945;&#964;&#949; &#956;&#951; &#969;&#962; &#949;&#957; &#964;&#951; &#960;&#945;&#961;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#953;&#945; &#956;&#959;&#965; &#956;&#959;&#957;&#959;&#957; &#945;&#955;&#955;&#945; &#957;&#965;&#957; &#960;&#959;&#955;&#955;&#969; &#956;&#945;&#955;&#955;&#959;&#957; &#949;&#957; &#964;&#951; &#945;&#960;&#959;&#965;&#963;&#953;&#945; &#956;&#959;&#965; &#956;&#949;&#964;&#945; &#966;&#959;&#946;&#959;&#965; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#964;&#961;&#959;&#956;&#959;&#965; &#964;&#951;&#957; &#949;&#945;&#965;&#964;&#969;&#957; &#963;&#969;&#964;&#951;&#961;&#953;&#945;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#964;&#949;&#961;&#947;&#945;&#950;&#949;&#963;&#952;&#949;

Php 2:13 for God is at work in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure" (RSV).
Php 2:13 For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure. (KJV)
Php 2:13 &#952;&#949;&#959;&#962; &#947;&#945;&#961; &#949;&#963;&#964;&#953;&#957; &#959; &#949;&#957;&#949;&#961;&#947;&#969;&#957; &#949;&#957; &#965;&#956;&#953;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#964;&#959; &#952;&#949;&#955;&#949;&#953;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#953; &#964;&#959; &#949;&#957;&#949;&#961;&#947;&#949;&#953;&#957; &#965;&#960;&#949;&#961; &#964;&#951;&#962; &#949;&#965;&#948;&#959;&#954;&#953;&#945;&#962;

So, No, there is not a whole bunch of verses missing!
 
Upvote 0