Ah, a new guy with a comment right out of the evolution hand book.
The mountains of evidence is for variation, and there is no dispute about that. No one is arguing this fact. The opposition is to common descent for which there is no evidence, just inference from evidence. Most of which can be inferred common design as well.
If it wasn't for ad hoc excuses and explanations, common descent would have been falsified long ago.
fossil stasis, "stabilizing selection"
Genes in organisms and not in ancestral organism "horizontal gene transfer"
no transitional fossils
jumping genes
phylogenetic tree is dead
population genetics shows no time for transitions
biology unable to produce many steps of change using mutation, selection
still, no consensus on what a species is
DNA and RNA point to different lineages
common descent is pretty much a mess, held together with (mEDT) and hope. Every piece of evidence that points away from it, is met with some sort of logicalism to make sense of it. Like, well, there is a real problem with transitional fossils in the record, so that must mean evolution happens too fast for us to see it. Yeh, that's it. After all, we have shown in the lab how fast we can evolve organisms.
Fascinating, with all the evidence out there how non of it has showed up here?
OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE
EVOLUTION IS A FACT
Also, post #360