no... Jesus was both man and God.Are you saying that when Jesus took on flesh it was not comparable to human flesh, but of a different type?
If so, the Incarnation is pointless.
Absolutely. Faith has to have meaning. It's also how Jesus recognises us as his own - as he shows in the separation of the sheep from the goats
It means to believe in Jesus For the Jews it meant that Israel was no longer the vine they are no longer saved just because they are Gods chosen people . The Savior, Jesus has come and He is the true vine if they do not accept Jesus they will be cut off If the disciple had rejected Jesus, they would have never received the Holy Spirit but as we know the disciples did remain and did receive His Holy Spirit forever.
John 15
The Vine and the Branches
1 "I am the true vine, and my Father is the gardener.
True vine is Jesus the Father planted . The Father planted Israel in OT.
At that time the Jews/ the disciples considered the vine to be Israel
Jeremiah 2:21
21 I had planted you like a choice vine
of sound and reliable stock.
How then did you turn against me
into a corrupt, wild vine?
I don't know why Protestants keep repeating this straw-man.We are called to look at fruit to discern whether or not a man is a true disciple, but it is not works that justify us before God.
Good works are an indication of what a man's heart may be. Works justify a man before men. Only God knows for certain the true condition of the heart. Only God knows who the children truly are. We know that men with works will one day say, "Lord, I cast out demons in Your Name. I did the good works." And Jesus will say, "I never knew you." Why? Because He never knew them. The Word NEVER took root in their hearts.
God already knows those whom He has justified. He has known them from before the foundations of the Earth were laid.
Are you saying that when Jesus took on flesh it was not comparable to human flesh, but of a different type?
If so, the Incarnation is pointless.
he was right, alot of unsaved don't steal or kill, and in some ways keep law. yet they are not holy, why ya figure?
rom 2;2626 So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? 27 Then he who is physically uncircumcised but keeps the law will condemn you who have the written code and circumcision but break the law.
So what's the punishment for?In some ways keep the Law? What does that mean? Either you keep the commandments of God, or you don't. There is no in-between.
All who keep the commandments are born of God!
well said, thank youI think she's simply saying that flesh does not count for anything before God. Only the Spirit does. For example, being born of Israel (being a physical descendant of Abraham) means nothing before the LORD, what only matters is being born of the Spirit (believing in Jesus Christ).
While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. Someone told him, Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.
He replied to him, Who is my mother, and who are my brothers? Pointing to his disciples, he said, Here are my mother and my brothers. For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother. Matthew 12:46-50
Only those who do the will of the Father can be rightfully called the "brother, sister and mother" of Jesus Christ. For flesh gives birth to flesh, but the Spirit gives birth to the Spirit.
He was in the world, and though the world was made through him, the world did not recognize him. He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him. Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husbands will, but born of God. John 1:10-13
So what's the punishment for?
because the Lord disciplines those he loves, and he punishes everyone he accepts as a son." Hebrews 12:6
Endure hardship as discipline; God is treating you as sons. For what son is not disciplined by his father? If you are not disciplined (and everyone undergoes discipline), then you are illegitimate children and not true sons. Hebrews 12:7-8
I dont know how a person could live under the law and say they are saved at the same time..but scripture says, sin will have dominion under law, not grace in rom 6;14. Why? Why would sin dominate under a command system, that says not to sin? So the bottom line, romans 7, just shows someone under law, so u can talk all about sin dwelling present and all that, but u r just talking a romans 7 life, and that is a fact.
Saying you only sin a little won't cut it... with God.Discipline is for those who are born of God: those who have fallen into temptation only for the moment, and not those who continue to sin.
Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite. 1 Kings 15:5
Saying you only sin a little won't cut it... with God.
James 2:10
For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.
I dont know how a person could live under the law and say they are saved at the same time..
It just doesnt add up because Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law."
Galatians 3
10 All who rely on observing the law are under a curse, for it is written:
"Cursed is everyone who does not continue to do everything written in the Book of the Law."
11 Clearly no one is justified before God by the law; because, "The righteous will live by faith."
Saying you only sin a little won't cut it... with God.
James 2:10
For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.
agree... because he was not under the law... he upheld the law.Depends on how one views the law. Paul isolated this matter entirely and sufficiently in accord also with Jesus' Words in Romans 13:8-10 where he ties 'any commandment' to how they should be comprehended and lived, also noting to put off our darkness. Is the law eradicated in those dictates?
NOPE. And can't be. What is eradicated is false understandings of same.
The Law is not against 'doing good' nor can it be. Paul himself engaged in many O.T legal rituals and practices. He didn't stand under same in condemnation whatsoever by doing so.
s
Well, if we compare ourselves with David verse's Jesus... we good to go...It cuts it if you repent of your sins and leave the life of sin, which happened to be the exactly what David did.
She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said to her, Neither do I condemn you: go, and sin no more. John 8:11
Saying you only sin a little won't cut it... with God.
James 2:10
For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.
Discipline is for those who are born of God: those who have sinned only for the moment, and not those who continue to sin.
Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite. 1 Kings 15:5
i have a fresh bold new idea.
i can easily prove where paul pointed to the cross, not law, for the already saved, to the alreay justified, reminding them not to be trying law sanctification.
but i ask u, since our theme was FAITH ALONE. Can u give us 1..1...,verse, connecting commandments, to what Christ did on the cross?
I await.
Because the cross is central to Christianity.
lets settle this.