I Am That Disciple

Status
Not open for further replies.

StogusMaximus

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2002
2,410
7
Visit site
✟4,841.00
Faith
Protestant
Did Jesus really love John more than the other disciples? Since John identifies himself as "that disciple whom Jesus loved," it is understood generally that Jesus loved him most. But I am raising 8 question about that, and I am being bold to assert that I am that disciple whom Jesus loved also.

As the author of the fourth Gospel, we see John to be a man of such modesty that he never mentions his own name even though he was much involved in the events narrated. He includes himself as "the other disciple" a number of times. He was reclining close to Jesus' breast at the Passover supper (John 13:23), but that would seem to be more an expression of John's love for Jesus than of Jesus' love for John. None of the other writers of sacred history point out John as being specially loved by Jesus. Were they unaware of such partiality or just too jealous to mention it?

Concerning Jesus' indiscriminate love for all of the disciples, John wrote of him "having loved his own who were in the world, he loved them to the end"-or, to the uttermost (John 13:1). In view of all this, how could John be so shameless as to claim to be Jesus' favorite without his displaying unbecoming egotism and without tempting the other disciples to become alienated by jealousy?

Five times this unpretentious man identified himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved. This seems to be a distinction that John claimed for himself long after the events of the narrative took place. As the years passed, he could relive by memory those experiences with his beloved Jesus. Perhaps, he remembered with some embarrassment his lack of faith, his faltering support, and his reluctance to express his love to him while with him. After a loved one is taken from us, we are inclined to recall our experiences together and to reproach ourselves for not having been kinder, more expressive of love, and more considerate of that loved one. The fact that the departed loved us in spite of our faults becomes more evident, causing us to contemplate deeply, "How he/she loved me!" So, in his own feelings of unworthiness, after witnessing and reflecting on the ultimate demonstration of Jesus' love for all sinners, John could think of Jesus as giving himself for him in a very personal way. Then in humble praise of him who loved such an unworthy person, John could exalt Jesus by declaring, "I am the disciple whom Jesus loved!" There was nothing exclusive about such a claim.

When I reflect on how he loved me individually when I was a helpless offender, I also can declare, "I am that disciple whom Jesus loved!" So can you.


http://www.freedomsring.org/fts/chap10.html
 

LuckyCharm

Back from Iraq 5 Apr 04
Feb 23, 2002
312
14
62
Tacoma, Washington
Visit site
✟8,105.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Stogus, your post reminds me of a wonderful essay by Blaine Smith on Gospelcom.net. An excerpt:

*****
On five occasions in his gospel, for instance, John refers to himself as the disciple whom Jesus loved (Jn 13:23, 19:26, 20:2, 21:7, 21:20). He clearly didn't mean that Jesus loved him more than anyone else. He notes that Jesus loved Mary, Martha and Lazarus (Jn 11:5, 36), and all of his disciples (Jn 13:1). In his most far-reaching statements John quotes Jesus as saying that anyone who follows him will be loved by God (Jn 14:21), and that God through Christ loves the world (Jn 3:16).

Why, then, did John call himself the disciple whom Jesus loved? I believe he meant that Jesus' love for him, while not exclusive, nor greater than his love for anyone else, was distinctive. Christ loved him in a way unique from his affection for any other person!

John would surely have thought it appropriate for Peter or any other disciple to make this same claim. By the same token, it's one that each of us who follows Christ can make for ourselves. The remarkable freedom John felt, in referring to himself in this fashion, suggests that we should think of ourselves in this way. It is not egotistical to do so, but vital to our self-image as Christians.

I've been intrigued to find no less a thinker than C. S. Lewis making a similar point. In The Problem of Pain he declares, "Why else were individuals created, but that God, loving all infinitely, should love each differently?"*

Centuries before, St. Augustine reflected on the distinctive nature of God's love in a prayer of his Confessions: "O Thou Good omnipotent, who so carest for every one of us, as if Thou caredst for him only; and so for all, as if they were but one!"
*****

http://www.gospelcom.net/nehemiah/distinct.htm

Have a blessed day, everyone!

--Cheryl
 
Upvote 0

StogusMaximus

Well-Known Member
Feb 5, 2002
2,410
7
Visit site
✟4,841.00
Faith
Protestant
Great article. When I first read line "the disciple whom Jesus loved" I was curious as to the meaning. I thought wow, what a claim to be the one person singled out as "the disciple whom Jesus loved". Who was this favorite disciple and how did he become the favorite.

Once I found that article I was touched that it had nothing to do with the disciple but the love of Jesus. I could actually see myself as "that disciple". I am a sinner, but Jesus Loves me.

It will smack you right in the face when you start to think of yourself, not as yourself, but as someone who Jesus loves.
 
Upvote 0

RayNay714

Worshiper and Seeker
Feb 19, 2002
443
1
42
Kentucky
Visit site
✟807.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Do you know that many scholars believe that the book of John was not written by the disciple himself, but by someone who was connected to him and was a close follower of Jesus? I find that interesting. If it were not John, why would they refer to this "one that Jesus loved?" I always just thought that it meant that maybe this disciple was Jesus' best friend. He was the one that Jesus was closest to. It has always seemed that way to me. I think that "the one Jesus loved" was the one whom Jesus was closest to. I don't think that it had anything to do with Jesus loving him more, it was only said to show the close relationship that they had.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.