M
muslimsoldier4life
Guest
What the hell is "New Atheism"? Most Atheists could care less what you believe in, as long as you don't bother them with it.
Upvote
0
No, it doesn´t. Even if a correlation can be observed concluding on causality is merely your interpretation. And even if a causality seems likely, it has yet to be shown that A causes B (as opposed to B causes A).Ok if thats the case then that the case, but it still apparently shows that faith (or lack of it) can influence behavior - be it charity, or in this case divorce rates.
True. So you are saying empathic people who give to the homeless are caused to be religious by their empathy?No, it doesn´t. Even if a correlation can be observed concluding on causality is merely your interpretation. And even if a causality seems likely, it has yet to be shown that A causes B (as opposed to B causes A).
What the hell is "New Atheism"? Most Atheists could care less what you believe in, as long as you don't bother them with it.
No, if you reread my previous post you will find that I was arguing against such unsupportable claims of causation.True. So you are saying empathic people who give to the homeless are caused to be religious by their empathy?
Conservative christians have a higher rate of divorce than atheists
U.S. divorce rates: for various faith groups, age groups and geographical areas
Tisk tisk. This survey has been called into question by more than one group, and faulty surveys don't really help a case.
"to qualify as born again, a person must have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ and believe that they will go to heaven because they confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior. The respondents are not asked whether they consider themselves born again.
Yknow, how Coca-Cola made "The New Coke" in the 80's, and that was a flop, so they went back to Coca-Cola Classic?
....yeah, I can only guess its something like that. It has to do with high-fructose corn syrup.
LOL, always a "catch" with Christians. You're not a true "Christian" unless you do this, or you do that.
Tisk tisk. This survey has been called into question by more than one group, and faulty surveys don't really help a case.
"to qualify as born again, a person must have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ and believe that they will go to heaven because they confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their Savior. The respondents are not asked whether they consider themselves born again. So who or what is evangelical according to Barna? Evangelicals are a subset of the born again respondents. To qualify as evangelicals for Barna, the respondents (in addition to the foregoing born again faith in Christ) stated that they believe that salvation is through grace alone, Jesus led a sinless life, the Bible is inerrant, they have a duty to share their faith, Satan is real, and God is omnipotent and perfect and created the universe. In other words, evangelicals are Christians that believe what the Bible says. Apparently, non born-again evangelicals in Barnas surveys do not believe the same biblical truths. Barna also reports that [e]vangelicals were twice as likely as non-evangelical born again adults (47% vs. 21%), and almost five times more likely than notional Christians (47% vs. 10%) to place faith at the top of the list [of their priorities in life]."
I love how this logic is never applied when polls show that 80% of the usa is christian, you'd think that in reality its like 5%.Pffff, do you know whether they also only surveyed true scotsman?
I love how this logic is never applied when polls show that 80% of the usa is christian, you'd think that in reality its like 5%.
Is that why we have Coke Zero now, alongside Diet Coke?
probably the best way is by pushing individualism to create theological anarchy, which makes the attempt process seem ridiculous.
(thanks luther).
So they just assume people are religious because they don't think? That's rather insulting. Besides, it just confirms OP's idea that 'New Atheists' are actively trying to get rid of religion.Eudaimonist said:It isn't the goal of the New Atheists to "destroy" religion, but to rationally enlighten people so that they change their minds and become atheists.
Consider this Wikipedia quote, which seems accurate to me.
New Atheism is the name given to a movement among some 21st-century atheist writers who have advocated the view that "religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed by rational argument wherever its influence arises.
Actually religious people are not only more likely to donate than secularists, they're also more likely to donate to non-religious causes:Exiledoomsayer said:You mean like those charities who in the name of god will actually refuse to give you aid unless you convert to their religion and if you refuse to play along they take their soup cans elsewhere and the needy be damned?
Christians are also more likely to get married than atheists and agnostics, and obviously you can't get divorced if you never get married. Atheists and agnostics also make up a much smaller percentage of the population that Christians in the USA. In terms of the actual number of people divorced, Christians are actually fairly low.The Nihilist said:Conservative christians have a higher rate of divorce than atheists
U.S. divorce rates: for various faith groups, age groups and geographical areas
And anyway, why would you want to claim Christianity if you didn't have some interest in following it, really?
For the prestige the Name has always carried.
Does it also have to be the world's largest child sex ring, or is that just icing on the cake?It's not really religion unless we're worshiping a mortal authority structure, yeah?