Coulter: Our Blacks Are So Much Better

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
And while we're at it - name one thing this [black] president has done to concretely benefit black Americans, other than to make them more indebted and dependent on their own government.
There is that tanning tax which blacks don't have to pay. Admittedly, it's an indirect benefit and it's fractions of a penny on the dollar, but still it counts as a benefit to blacks.

There, now ya got one. ;)

.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdwinWillers
Upvote 0

EdwinWillers

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
19,443
5,258
Galt's Gulch
✟8,420.00
Country
Niue
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If Obama did anything that solely helped black people every white person on the far-right would complain about what a "typical black" he was being by "giving his homies a handout" and accuse him of some sort of reverse racism. He can't win for losin'. I'm not an Obama fan, but I'm also not a fan of this stupid mindset that black politicians are supposed to act only in the interest of black people.
Well that's fine Kat, but none of that is what I said or intimated. And you're probably right that if he only acted in the interest of blacks he'd get accused thus - and rightly so.

However my question was to name one thing he's done to benefit blacks, which was asked in the context of black leadership in general, having asserted what a disservice black leadership has been for blacks in general. That was the context.

No, I don't expect Barack Obama to single out one group of Americans and focus his energies on just them. He's president of all groups of Americans. Still, the question remains - what has he done to benefit blacks? It's a perfectly legitimate question - and no different than asking of a Republican or Democrat president what they've done for Republicans or Democrats in general.

Moreover, it's a perfectly legitimate question in the general sense as well. What one thing has Barack Obama done to help anyone out in this country? He ordered Bin Laden's death; that was good... so there, maybe that's the answer...
 
Upvote 0

EdwinWillers

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
19,443
5,258
Galt's Gulch
✟8,420.00
Country
Niue
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There is that tanning tax which blacks don't have to pay. Admittedly, it's an indirect benefit and it's fractions of a penny on the dollar, but still it counts as a benefit to blacks.

There, now ya got one. ;)

.
Oh my; I completely forgot about that. :thumbsup:
  1. He ordered Bin Laden's death (benefit for all Americans)
  2. He excluded blacks from the tanning tax.
Cool :D
 
Upvote 0

NightHawkeye

Work-in-progress
Site Supporter
Jul 5, 2010
45,814
10,318
✟803,537.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
coulter is a psychotic [fill in the blank] beast. And so is anyone who defends her.
That's a horrifyingly insensitive sexist thing to say about the woman. I'm shocked!


[NHE briefly savors the rich irony of the moment.]
 
Upvote 0

EdwinWillers

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
19,443
5,258
Galt's Gulch
✟8,420.00
Country
Niue
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
coulter is a psychotic [fill in the blank] beast. And so is anyone who defends her.
I'm absolutely defending her. Are you suggesting I'm a "psychotic [fill in the blank] beast?"

(Let's see how far the irony lasts)
 
Upvote 0

serenity now

HOOCHIE MAMA!
Oct 10, 2011
80
1
✟15,205.00
Faith
Agnostic
DISCLAIMER: I only know one black person (my best friend growing up) and I haven't talked to him in a few years, so I'm probably racist.

It is obvious that Ann Coulter isn't in it to convert liberals. I think we can all agree on that. Like every pundit, she's found an audience and panders to them to pay the bills; she just happens to be a bit more "into" it. At least she got us talking right? I'm sure pretty much everyone on this thread has put more thought into their posts than Coulter did in her remark.

I think one thing that hasn't been said yet in this thread but has been constantly hinted at is that there is massive overlap between the black community and those living in poverty, or those working to end it. To assume most blacks vote one way or another because of other black people seems a bit disingenuous; it's more likely that they tend to vote democrat because democrats support welfare programs and such. Having a new conservative black man isn't necessarily going to automatically win them over (well most of them anyway) because he's, well, still conservative.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,058
16,810
Dallas
✟870,771.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It wasn't liberals who championed the Equal Rights Amendment - they opposed it by and large. It was conservatives.

It wasn't liberals who championed the Voting Rights Act - they opposed it by and large. It was conservatives.

Seriously? You're getting to be as bad as Ann herself.


Name some...


Neo-cons and deficit hawks who were socially liberal
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,055
17,519
Finger Lakes
✟11,153.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Daisy, I never said you did, did I? Don't be puttin words into my mouth I never said. Some might consider that defamatory.
I didn't put any words in your mouth and you know it. You said that liberals do that and I am a liberal, but I don't do that.

Or what, you'll report me?
You know very well that it is not against the rules to tell lies about your fellow posters, but the mods will sanction anyone who calls the deed by its name.

Correct me if I'm wrong, it WAS you who wrote this little gem, right: That isn't exactly showing the utmost respect for blacks; and that's precisely why I think in such a comment you did indeed express express disrespect for blacks.
Are you kidding? That is saying nothing about blacks and everything about people who make such a claim. I am astounded that you could be so ignorant of such a common expression and its meaning that you would get it completely backwards.

It's a disrespectful comment
It's disrespectful, but not towards blacks. Coulter is objectifying blacks, "our blacks" as though they are not individual persons like herself, and I am ridiculing her for that with this expression.

...and taking advantage of blacks by including them in your little joke about Ann Coulter as you did.
Yeah, right - the little joke is directed at Coulter and her attitude towards blacks.


So is it possible for me to rest my case now?
No, you haven't yet apologized for telling that [untruth] about me.

You have admitted you do ridicule and disdain Ms. Coulter;
Absolutely.

and you do - albeit jokingly - think some of her best friends are blacks.
No, I think, jokingly, that she would CLAIM that some of her best friends are black. This is a well-known saying - do you really need it explained to you?

Tell me - how is that REMOTELY respectful of blacks?
It has nothing to do with blacks themselves and everything to do with certain peoples' attitudes towards blacks. Do you really need to have that expression explained to you?

I mean, if I need to apologize, I will - and do;
That's your apology? Great.

...but seriously do you think so little of blacks as to include them in your disdainful jokes about conservatives?
Great - you'll apologize then in the very same sentence repeat the same offensive [untruth] about me again.

For what it's worth - I'm a little embarrassed to say I actually used that line once - in one of my first days at boot camp; I was getting abuse by a group of blacks which wasn't leading anywhere positive. I asked why they were giving me grief; I certainly held no animosity for them, heck one of my best friends was indeed black - and they practically guffawed (it was corny - but I meant it), which made me angry because it was the truth. And that's what put a stop to their bullying. My company in boot camp was 90% black, turns out - and I made a lot of friends there - and we had a blast.
Oh. So you are perfectly aware of what the expression means in general parlance.

So I can't stand that joke - because it demeans blacks, it disses them, it lowers them to the level of joke material. Again, if I have to apologize, I do - but from my perspective, it's you who owe us an apology.
No, it does NOT demean blacks in the least - it demeans condescending hypocrites. If somebody said of a misogynist that some of his best friends were women (the expression is flexible for various occasions), I would not take that comment to reflect on women, but, rightly, on the misogynist.

I've heard that some people were literally unable to understand sarcasm.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LOCO

Church Militant
Jun 29, 2011
1,143
68
✟16,689.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Ann Coulter needs to eat a sandwich or two. Not to mention this women does nothing but spew hate. She pretty much embodies everything that is wrong with political discourse these days.

Add to that everything that is wrong with Christianity today.
 
Upvote 0

dcyates

Senior Member
May 28, 2005
1,513
88
58
Calgary, AB.
✟2,162.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Definitely!

“They’ve [CHINA] indicated that they’re trying to develop nuclear capability and they want to develop more aircraft carriers like we have. So, yes, we have to consider them a military threat,”

(Granted it was only recently that China detonated their first nuclear weapon, just a short 47 years ago.)

“When they ask me, who is the president of Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan? I’m going to say, you know, I don’t know.”

I mean who on earth would expect the potential President of the United States to know who the president of Uzbekistan (or whatever country Cain was thinking of) was?

That's just crazy!
How right you are! I mean, if we can't expect the president of the U.S. to know the name of every single head of all 280-some odd nations around the world, well then, they just shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office. I mean, really!
Cain is so smart he's working on making Sarah Palin look like a Rhodes Scholar!
Yeah, exactly! What are we looking for in a president? A rocket scientist?
Oh wait. Herman Cain actually was a rocket scientist.
But still, Obama went to elite schools and was the editor of the Harvard Law Review. However... He steadfastly refuses to make any of his grades public and he, strangely, never published even a single article in the Harvard Law Review.

Well, okay, is it too much to ask for someone with executive experience, and who has actually accomplished something?!?
Oh. Just a second. Herman Cain took, not one, but two huge, but failing, nation-wide companies and turned them around into successful, money-making enterprises. And, he didn't have his life handed to him on a silver platter every step of the way, but actually had to work for his achievements.
But still, look! Obama took his elite, ultra-expensive education and became a... community organizer. So there.

Well, fine. But don't you want somebody who, at least, loves his country?
Hmmm. Herman Cain does readily profess his love for America and his belief in American exceptionalism.
But, on the other hand, Obama counts people like domestic terrorist Bill Ayers among his close friends and attended Rev. Jeremiah Wright's anti-American, racist-spewing church for two decades. Soooo... You know... There's that.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟70,740.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Ms. Coulter's comments are spot on. It's a given that conservatives are better friends to blacks than liberals. Liberals love it when "their blacks" stay in their rightful lowly places, dependent, needy, beholden to them. When some "uppity" black like Mr. Cain dares better himself, work hard, get educated, and rise out of the dungeons prepared and oh so diligently maintained for them by their liberal masters, liberals are incensed, appalled, angered and so commence with the most hateful behavior they can muster (and it doesn't take much for them to muster it) - calling them "uncle Toms," "oreos," and all other manner of spiteful, disgusting names.
Ann is that you?
It wasn't liberals who championed the Equal Rights Amendment - they opposed it by and large. It was conservatives.It wasn't liberals who championed the Voting Rights Act - they opposed it by and large. It was conservatives.
So those conservatives were championing a liberal position? Good for them.
The black community in this nation is SORELY served by their liberal leaders who have done more to "keep them on the plantation" than any other group out there. And that's a fact.
No it's not. That's your opinion.
Me? I love those titles because they capture the essence of the truth about liberalism - slanderous (case in point, what's happening to Cain right now), treasonous, demonic & godless (liberalism and righteousness are demonstrably incompatible), criminal, life-threateningly dangerous... As I said before, I think she's spot - on.
Good for you.Though I do remember a while back that you were talking about civility in discourse (well actually, it was more akin to lecturing people on civility). I'm fairly confident that now is the time to apply what you were talking about to Coulter and to yourself. Or is civility only useful to you in so far as it scores cheap political points?
 
Upvote 0

dcyates

Senior Member
May 28, 2005
1,513
88
58
Calgary, AB.
✟2,162.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
It's disrespectful, but not towards blacks. Coulter is objectifying blacks, "our blacks" as though they are not individual persons like herself, and I am ridiculing her for that with this expression.
Yeah, you're right, Ann Coulter is an obvious racist. In fact, her and those other obvious racists -- Tea Partiers and right-wing Republicans -- are trying so hard to hide their obvious racism that they're willing to elect a black man like Herman Cain president of their country just to do it.

(However, just between you and me, DaisyDay, any of the true racists that I've ever had the displeasure of meeting couldn't care less that anybody thinks of them as racist, don't even try to hide it, and would never in a million years place their vote for a coloured-person to lead their country in an effort to hide it. I mean, that just makes no sense. But that's just between you and me. Shhh. Don't tell anybody.)
 
Upvote 0

EdwinWillers

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2010
19,443
5,258
Galt's Gulch
✟8,420.00
Country
Niue
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I didn't put any words in your mouth and you know it. You said that liberals do that and I am a liberal, but I don't do that.
I made a general comment about liberals and you chose to make it personal, as if it were a comment about you specifically. That's not my fault. And it is putting words into my mouth because like it or not, it was NOT directed at you specifically. How you chose to receive it was your choice, and nothing more than that - your choice.

No, you haven't yet apologized for telling that lie about me.
Again, I made a general comment and you chose to take it personal. No one "lied" about you, though this whole line of accusation is beginning to take the form of a lie about me.

That's your apology? Great.

Great - you'll apologize then in the very same sentence repeat the same offensive lie again.
I didn't need to apologize, for my comment was a general comment. I am sorry you took it personally. But nowhere did I lie about you.

Oh. So you are perfectly aware of what the expression means in general parlance.
I'm also aware of how blacks - [[oops generalization, note to self, mustn't generalize...]] - those blacks to whom I made that comment received it. Let me assure you it was explained to me in great detail how offensive it was to them, by them; and I took their umbrage at the comment as credible for that reason, and noted it here based on that.

No, it does NOT demean blacks in the least - it demeans condescending hypocrites. If somebody said of a misogynist that some of his best friends were women (the expression is flexible for various occasions), I would not take that comment to reflect on women, but, rightly, on the misogynist.
From *your* perspective, you may not have intended any disrespect, just as from mine neither did I - but intentions do not (unless without much explanation) an offended party's feelings assuage (as is quite obvious here).

I've heard that some people were literally unable to understand sarcasm.
...and general commentary too apparently.

I think we've spent quite enough of everyone's time discussing what you think I said on this thread and how it made you feel. If you care to discuss it further I suggest we take it off line. Feel free to PM me if you have more you care to say on this matter and I'll be glad to discuss it as reasonably and dispassionately as possible.
 
Upvote 0

Archaeopteryx

Wanderer
Jul 1, 2007
22,229
2,608
✟70,740.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I made a general comment about liberals and you chose to make it personal, as if it were a comment about you specifically. That's not my fault. And it is putting words into my mouth because like it or not, it was NOT directed at you specifically. How you chose to receive it was your choice, and nothing more than that - your choice.

Again, I made a general comment and you chose to take it personal. No one "lied" about you, though this whole line of accusation is beginning to take the form of a lie about me.

I didn't need to apologize, for my comment was a general comment. I am sorry you took it personally. But nowhere did I lie about you.

I'm also aware of how blacks - [[oops generalization, note to self, mustn't generalize...]] - those blacks to whom I made that comment received it. Let me assure you it was explained to me in great detail how offensive it was to them, by them; and I took their umbrage at the comment as credible for that reason, and noted it here based on that.

From *your* perspective, you may not have intended any disrespect, just as from mine neither did I - but intentions do not (unless without much explanation) an offended party's feelings assuage (as is quite obvious here).

...and general commentary too apparently.

I think we've spent quite enough of everyone's time discussing what you think I said on this thread and how it made you feel. If you care to discuss it further I suggest we take it off line. Feel free to PM me if you have more you care to say on this matter and I'll be glad to discuss it as reasonably and dispassionately as possible.

Conservatives can be such jerks. But don't take it personally Edwin. I'm only speaking generally, like you.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ton80

Well-Known Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,774
79
✟2,365.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I made a general comment about liberals and you chose to make it personal, as if it were a comment about you specifically. That's not my fault.

Sure it is your fault. Don't make general statements about liberals or other groups of people and you will not have others criticizing your comments.
 
Upvote 0