EdwinWillers
Well-Known Member
- Jan 13, 2010
- 19,443
- 5,258
- Country
- Niue
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Awww, did widdle Bawwy not get his own way again?
Upvote
0
Awww, did widdle Bawwy not get his own way again?
And you can sometimes get out of a hole by digging deeper. I get it. 2+2 is 3.Not necessarily and not next month.
Sometimes you do exactly that.
Choosing to default when you have other options - including raising revenue - is irresponsible in the extreme.
No argument.
It would be Obama's choice to not pay SSI or other entitlements. There is 200 billion a month in revenue. Just because you can't pay all your bills means you pay none of them??
Wait... why is Cantor doing all the work for the Republicans? Isn't this Boehner's job too?
So just rubber stamping the debt ceiling is your idea of lifting the mantel of fiscal responsibility? Why not just pass a debt limit of $50 trillion and not worry about it?Defaulting would cause a significant amount of penalty for little or no reason and send the economy reeling. I doubt we would have enough revenue to keep the military operational.
It's about on the same level of financial stupidity as not paying your credit card bills.
But have at it o lifters of the mantel of fiscal responsibility.
Because they won in a landslide that was largely based on repudiating the things Obama wants.
Defaulting would cause a significant amount of penalty for little or no reason and send the economy reeling. I doubt we would have enough revenue to keep the military operational.
It's about on the same level of financial stupidity as not paying your credit card bills.
But have at it o lifters of the mantel of fiscal responsibility.
So just rubber stamping the debt ceiling is your idea of lifting the mantel of fiscal responsibility? Why not just pass a debt limit of $50 trillion and not worry about it?
What evidence is there that the economy will 'crash' if the debt ceiling is not raised?Yes, that actually is better than crashing your economy on purpose all at once and right now.
But that isn't what was offered, there were trillions of dollars of cuts on the table.
So why did the Democrats spend the trillions of dollars that would send us into this situation? Did they not know there was a debt limit, that they did not have enough revenue to cover their expenditures and that bad things would happen if we default?
Or continuing to spend money you don't have and then going to your boss (in this case the American people) demanding a pay raise because if you don't get more 'revenue' you'll default on the debts you've incurred, your credit score will be ruined and you won't be able to borrow more money ... got it.
We are. Wreckless spending got us into this mess, not a lack of revenue for the government, so we address the problem that caused this mess.
What evidence is there that the economy will 'crash' if the debt ceiling is not raised?
Not raising the debt limit means we cant borrow more, it doesnt mean that we cant make our current debt payments. We are not going to default no matter what happens on Aug. 2.All the economists who are predicting dire consequences if the debt ceiling isn't raised and our creditors promising if we default they will immediately downgrade our rating.
Not raising the debt limit means we cant borrow more, it doesnt mean that we cant make our current debt payments. We are not going to default no matter what happens on Aug. 2.
What evidence is there that the economy will 'crash' if the debt ceiling is not raised?
The government will still take in revenue each month from taxes--something like $200 billion. Servicing the debt runs about $20 billion per month. So the only way to default is for the Obama administration to choose not to make the payment. There are lots of things that wont get paid, but if they prioritize debt payments--as they should-- there will not be a default.OK. Got a citation for that or is it just your considered opinion?