Liberal Christians

Status
Not open for further replies.

lismore

Maranatha
Oct 28, 2004
20,687
4,359
Scotland
✟245,339.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am reminded of the parable Jesus told about the good samaritan.

The priest and the scribe were too holy to help the injured man and walked on by. They didnt want to commit any sins, perhaps it was all just a cover for their own prejudicies. By trying not to defile themselves they sinned in the worst possible way.

But the good samaritan stopped, poured in the oil and the wine and helped the man.

Lets give this parable a modern slant.

There was a baptist driving to his sunday service who swerved to miss a cat crossing the road and went into a tree. The baptist was now injured and called out for help.

A car load of other baptists drove by but didnt stop because they didnt want to be late for church. Being late would make them look unholy.

The assistant pastor drove by but didnt stop because he wanted to be seen at church, he hoped to be made full pastor one day. Not being on the platform at kick off time would make him seem unholy.

Finally two lesbians drove by and stopped, they called 911 and put the injured man in the recovery position. Later in the hospital they waited to see if the man was ok.

Now which of these was a good neighbour to the man?

:)
 
Upvote 0
May 10, 2011
677
29
✟8,534.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What I mean is the world seems to be filling up with liberal Christianity by the minute. Those who decide it is ok to drink in moderation or do drugs because God made them or date several people at once, look at inappropriate material because it "does not hurt anyone", accepting of worldly ways and things. Women not being submissive, men not taking the lead, woman dressing provocatively, men "checking out" every woman who walks by. Those are just a few examples. The list goes on for miles. Nobody seems to be concerned with avoiding the appearance of evil these days. Ok, just my two cents :idea:
First let me say I'm probably one of the most conservative Christians on this board, and while I'm in complete agreement with everything in your statement, and being as conservative as I'am I don't drink any alcoholic beverages, but in defense of biblical truth, having a glass of wine with dinner or a beer on a hot day is not in the least a biblical sin, drunkeness and revilery on the otherhand is! and while beer and wine can lead to these things, the things themselves are not evil, just as gluttony is a sin yet eating food is not sin, I'm not sure what your thought is, in the word "moderation", if it arrives to drunkeness then I agree with you, but if its having an occasional drink, like at a wedding! I think the bible in its fullness is conclusive on this matter
 
Upvote 0
May 10, 2011
677
29
✟8,534.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It certainly could be the start of the falling away. That is for sure!

The wine that Jesus drank I would imagine was not fermented.
then it would be called grape juice...lol.....take an afternoon and google verses in the bible that mention the word wine, from the days of Noah wine was what it is wine, drink it in excess and it becomes a sin
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,497
157
43
Atlanta, GA
✟24,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Hello:)

I disagree. Love is selflless! Not selfish:
1 Cor 13.
3 If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing.
4 Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. 5 It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
8 Love never fails.


There is no room for fear in love because perfect love casts out all fear! God is love.

Fleshly love can be selfish. The love described in the Bible is part and parcel of the fruit of the Spirit cannot be selfish. Sadly, when many liberals speak of loving your fellow man they mean it in more of a fleshly sense of the word. Of course, there is more to the fruit of the Spirit than just love. Galatians 5 is a good chapter to read. Not only does it reference the fruit of the Spirit, but also cautions believers against turning Christian liberty into a spirit of licentiousness which gives way to satisfying the flesh. Oftentimes, liberal Christians operate on the premise of licentiousness and call it liberty. It's the premise of, "hey, whatever feels good, it's cool. Jesus doesn't judge and I won't either, because that's the Golden Rule".

I think what you are describing is not love, rather some seemingly good works done because of insecurity, an obsessive and irrational fear of hell, an obsessive compulsion about sins and holiness which in the end does not lead to holiness. Insecure people do not become holy. It either leads to self-righteousness or burn out.

I've heard that argument before, but it doesn't hold water. A person is not washed in the regeneration of the Holy Spirit unless they are born again. Your desire for holiness and good works based on striving for holiness (not sinlessness!) is a supernatural occurrence that is part and parcel of being born again, which means you have been granted eternal security from hell. I'm not saying there aren't Christians who think their good works keep them from hell or that a slip-up in sin will cause them to lose their salvation, but I don't believe that way. I believe once a person is saved they have eternal security from hell and that holiness is an outward demonstration of obedience and love for Christ, because that is what the Bible calls for. "Be ye holy, as I am holy".

Holiness is given by Jesus, he was made sin so that we would become the righteousness of God. We cant earn it, only receive it as a gift.

God Bless:)

You are right, we cannot earn it. The problem is that many liberal Christians don't even try to live it most of the time. The pervasive attitude of general permissiveness even among brethren shows a severe lack of understanding Christ's commands. Holiness is something we strive for not because we fear hell, but because we want to live to exemplify Christ. I don't recall Christ telling people, "go, and continue in your sin, because I came to pay the price for your sins once and for all". He called people to repentance. Many liberal Christians call people to over look grievous sins in their own congregations, because Jesus loved everyone.

Yes, Jesus loved everyone, but He called them to repentance and holiness as well. He didn't sup with sinners and tax collectors because they were the cool people to hang out with. He did it to testify of Himself being the prophecy fulfilled, manifested in the flesh, but still a part of the Godhead. He didn't sit with the prostitutes and lepers just to make them feel good. In fact, His message was often considered offensive, because He convicted people of their sin.

Love is not general permissiveness and dismissal of what other believers do in their lives. The Bible completely contradicts this tolerance for everything = love = being a true follower of Christ.

1 John 5:3 says:
3 In fact, this is love for God: to keep his commands. And his commands are not burdensome,

This verse both disproves the liberal notion that the only thing we have to do in order to be a good Christian is love everyone, regardless of how they are living and the notion you presented that striving for holiness is done only out of fear and ultimately leads to burn-out. It won't in the life of a believer, and I don't mean someone who merely believes in a "higher power" or that Jesus was a cool cat who did exist at some point. I'm talking about Bible believers.

2 Peter 2:1
But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves.

Psalm 97:10
Let those who love the LORD hate evil,
for he guards the lives of his faithful ones
and delivers them from the hand of the wicked.

Romans 12:9
9 Love must be sincere. Hate what is evil; cling to what is good.

Ephesians 5:11
11 Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them.

Luke 13:5
I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish.”

Acts 2:38
Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.

There was a baptist driving to his sunday service who swerved to miss a cat crossing the road and went into a tree. The baptist was now injured and called out for help.

A car load of other baptists drove by but didnt stop because they didnt want to be late for church. Being late would make them look unholy.

The assistant pastor drove by but didnt stop because he wanted to be seen at church, he hoped to be made full pastor one day. Not being on the platform at kick off time would make him seem unholy.

Finally two lesbians drove by and stopped, they called 911 and put the injured man in the recovery position. Later in the hospital they waited to see if the man was ok.

Now which of these was a good neighbour to the man?

Once again, this does not hold water. Nobody has said that a car load of people heading to church are any better than a couple of lesbians or that gay people or atheists or liberals or anyone else aren't capable of good deeds. What we're saying is that you have a group of people whom you would never know by their behaviors and manner of speaking that they are Christians. They trash the in errancy and sufficiency of the Bible as the authority, the manner in which the Holy Spirit speaks to us in very tangible ways. They trash other Christians for simply striving for holiness. They prefer the company of non-believers. They favor the local coffee house meet-up of free-thinkers over the general assembly of believers in Christ. They don't know much about the Bible, but they know just enough to try and pretend isolating one verse and pretending to be really knowledgeable about Greek puts them in a position of spiritual authority over those who strive to let the Holy Spirit speak to them through the Scriptures. They claim conservative evangelicals are the ones who use Bible verses to "clobber" others, only they are far too eager themselves to engage in the same thing.
 
Upvote 0

EarthPsalts

the "P" is silent!
May 26, 2011
87
14
59
las vegas, nv
Visit site
✟7,768.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are there really any good old fashioned conservative Christians out there anymore? If so, I want to find you! lol. I am so sad to see the Christian population has become so liberal in their morals, thinking etc....:confused:

i'm conservative. i believe that we are to hold to a higher standard than that of the world. i believe that what God expected of people 2000 years ago is what He still expects of people today. i believe that we should be held accountable for our actions. i believe we should hold one another accountable as well.

and i believe that the "don't judge me lest you be judged" is not only a gross misunderstanding of scripture, but it's also a whiney cop-out.
 
Upvote 0

mwood30

Mickey
Dec 13, 2009
814
19
Visit site
✟16,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Fleshly love can be selfish. The love described in the Bible is part and parcel of the fruit of the Spirit cannot be selfish. Sadly, when many liberals speak of loving your fellow man they mean it in more of a fleshly sense of the word. Of course, there is more to the fruit of the Spirit than just love. Galatians 5 is a good chapter to read. Not only does it reference the fruit of the Spirit, but also cautions believers against turning Christian liberty into a spirit of licentiousness which gives way to satisfying the flesh. Oftentimes, liberal Christians operate on the premise of licentiousness and call it liberty. It's the premise of, "hey, whatever feels good, it's cool. Jesus doesn't judge and I won't either, because that's the Golden Rule".



I've heard that argument before, but it doesn't hold water. A person is not washed in the regeneration of the Holy Spirit unless they are born again. Your desire for holiness and good works based on striving for holiness (not sinlessness!) is a supernatural occurrence that is part and parcel of being born again, which means you have been granted eternal security from hell. I'm not saying there aren't Christians who think their good works keep them from hell or that a slip-up in sin will cause them to lose their salvation, but I don't believe that way. I believe once a person is saved they have eternal security from hell and that holiness is an outward demonstration of obedience and love for Christ, because that is what the Bible calls for. "Be ye holy, as I am holy".



You are right, we cannot earn it. The problem is that many liberal Christians don't even try to live it most of the time. The pervasive attitude of general permissiveness even among brethren shows a severe lack of understand Christ's commands. Holiness is something we strive for not because we fear hell, but because we want to live to exemplify Christ. I don't recall Christ telling people, "go, and continue in your sin, because I came to pay the price for your sins once and for all". He called people to repentance. Many liberal Christians call people to over look grievous sins in their own congregations, because Jesus loved everyone.

Yes, Jesus loved everyone, but He called them to repentance and holiness as well. He didn't sup with sinners and tax collectors because they were the cool people to hang out with. He did it to testify of Himself being the prophecy fulfilled, manifested in the flesh, but still a part of the Godhead. He didn't sit with the prostitutes and lepers just to make them feel good. In fact, His message was often considered offensive, because He convicted people of their sin.

Love is not general permissiveness and dismissal of what other believers do in their lives. The Bible completely contradicts this tolerance for everything = love = being a true follower of Christ.

1 John 5:3 says:


This verse both disproves the liberal notion that the only thing we have to do in order to be a good Christian is love everyone, regardless of how they are living and the notion you presented that striving for holiness is done only out of fear and ultimately leads to burn-out. It won't in the life of a believer, and I don't mean someone who merely believes in a "higher power" or that Jesus was a cool cat who did exist at some point. I'm talking about Bible believers.

2 Peter 2:1


Psalm 97:10


Romans 12:9


Ephesians 5:11


Luke 13:5


Acts 2:38




Once again, this does not hold water. Nobody has said that a car load of people heading to church are any better than a couple of lesbians or that gay people or atheists or liberals or anyone else aren't capable of good deeds. What we're saying is that you have a group of people whom you would never know by their behaviors and manner of speaking that they are Christians. They trash the in errancy and sufficiency of the Bible as the authority, the manner in which the Holy Spirit speaks to us in very tangible ways. They trash other Christians for simply striving for holiness. They prefer the company of non-believers. They favor the local coffee house meet-up of free-thinkers over the general assembly of believers in Christ. They don't know much about the Bible, but they know just enough to try and pretend isolating one verse and pretending to be really knowledgeable about Greek puts them in a position of spiritual authority over those who strive to let the Holy Spirit speak to them through the Scriptures. They claim conservative evangelicals are the ones who use Bible verses to "clobber" others, only they are far too eager themselves to engage in the same thing.

Wow! Let me pick a few.

As someone who has memorized entire books of the Bible word for word when I was a teenager, I find it incredible that you could paint liberals as knowing just a little bit of the Bible.

As for the Greek, yes, that's a big difference. To get a degree in theology from a liberal university, you must be able to read the Bible in Greek. Most conservative pastors cannot. The Greek is the final authority.

With this in mind, you are speaking double talk. You poo poo us wanting to read the Bible in its original language, yet you say we have less respect for the text.

I don't even know where to begin to truly address your clearly misguided understanding of liberal Christians. Maybe you've labelled liberal non-Christians as Christians. That's a possibility. But your characterization could be more opposite of liberal Christians. Really.

And I'll be glad to go over all your verses one by one if you'd like (the New Testament ones since the Golden Rule is what replaced the Old Testament Law of course).
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,497
157
43
Atlanta, GA
✟24,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Wow! Let me pick a few.

As someone who has memorized entire books of the Bible word for word when I was a teenager, I find it incredible that you could paint liberals as knowing just a little bit of the Bible.

You can know what the Bible says and still decide to reject it as being in authority over your life. It's sort of the head knowledge vs. heart knowledge thing. In Isaiah 55:11 the Lord says this:

so is my word that goes out from my mouth: It will not return to me empty, but will accomplish what I desire and achieve the purpose for which I sent it.

As for the Greek, yes, that's a big difference. To get a degree in theology from a liberal university, you must be able to read the Bible in Greek. Most conservative pastors cannot. The Greek is the final authority.

Most conservative pastors cannot speak Greek? That's funny, because every Baptist pastor I've ever studied under received a doctorate from seminary and knew the Greek language very well.

With this in mind, you are speaking double talk. You poo poo us wanting to read the Bible in its original language, yet you say we have less respect for the text.

You have less respect for the very nature of the Scriptures, unless you're one of the liberal Christians who actually believes the Scriptures to be the inspired, infallible, authoritative Word of God, in that case my last paragraph would not apply to you.

I don't even know where to begin to truly address your clearly misguided understanding of liberal Christians. Maybe you've labelled liberal non-Christians as Christians. That's a possibility. But your characterization could be more opposite of liberal Christians. Really.

Do many liberal Christians not attack the in errancy and sufficiency of the Scriptures?

Do many liberal Christians bash other Christians over striving for holiness?

Do many liberal Christians not reject the concept of hell, the regeneration in the Holy Spirit, repentance of sins, and bearing fruit?

And I'll be glad to go over all your verses one by one if you'd like (the New Testament ones since the Golden Rule is what replaced the Old Testament Law of course).

You may go over them all day long as you wish, but no amount of spin can turn the Scriptures into what you want them to be.
 
Upvote 0

mwood30

Mickey
Dec 13, 2009
814
19
Visit site
✟16,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
You can know what the Bible says and still decide to reject it as being in authority over your life. It's sort of the head knowledge vs. heart knowledge thing. In Isaiah 55:11 the Lord says this:





Most conservative pastors cannot speak Greek? That's funny, because every Baptist pastor I've ever studied under received a doctorate from seminary and knew the Greek language very well.



You have less respect for the very nature of the Scriptures, unless you're one of the liberal Christians who actually believes the Scriptures to be the inspired, infallible, authoritative Word of God, in that case my last paragraph would not apply to you.



Do many liberal Christians not attack the in errancy and sufficiency of the Scriptures?

Do many liberal Christians bash other Christians over striving for holiness?

Do many liberal Christians not reject the concept of hell, the regeneration in the Holy Spirit, repentance of sins, and bearing fruit?



You may go over them all day long as you wish, but no amount of spin can turn the Scriptures into what you want them to be.

So if I discuss scripture, it's spin. If you discuss scripture it's truth. Really nice. Do you wonder why we question the sincerity of conservatives when those kind of double standards are applied?
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,497
157
43
Atlanta, GA
✟24,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So if I discuss scripture, it's spin. If you discuss scripture it's truth. Really nice. Do you wonder why we question the sincerity of conservatives when those kind of double standards are applied?

More spin. See, you even attempt to spin my mention of spin. It's okay, it's a typical liberal trait so I'll overlook it and attempt to get to my point. Since you cannot answer my very simple questions, I'll post them again so as not to be missed among a giant wall of text:

1. Do liberal Christians reject the concepts of regeneration of the Holy Spirit, eternal separation from God due to rejecting Christ (hell), the in errancy of the Scriptures, rebuking sin in another believer, and striving for holiness as Christ called for?

2. Do liberal Christians reject the concept of sin altogether and claim it's merely "personal interpretation"?

3. Do liberal Christians bash evangelicals about striving for holiness?

4. Do liberal Christians believe the only passages in the Bible that pertain to them are the ones in red print and everything else was merely the jaded opinions of men?

5. Do liberal Christians believe all paths lead to heaven, even if they are paths that blatantly disregard God's authority and supremacy?

6. Do liberal Christians believe all one must do is believe Jesus existed and be tolerant in order to profess Christianity?

7. Do liberal Christians believe it's okay to support things that are the complete antithesis to the Scriptures, all for the sake of being tolerant and loving?

8. Do liberal Christians act and speak in a manner befitting of a Christian (being separate from the world, being in the world, but not of the world), or would no one readily identify them as a Christian based on the words and deeds alone? Would someone be shocked to discover this person is a professing Christian?

9. Do liberal Christians prefer the company of liberal non-christians, because they're so open-minded, than actual believers?
 
Upvote 0

mwood30

Mickey
Dec 13, 2009
814
19
Visit site
✟16,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
More spin. See, you even attempt to spin my mention of spin. It's okay, it's a typical liberal trait so I'll overlook it and attempt to get to my point. Since you cannot answer my very simple questions, I'll post them again so as not to be missed among a giant wall of text:

1. Do liberal Christians reject the concepts of regeneration of the Holy Spirit, eternal separation from God due to rejecting Christ (hell), the in errancy of the Scriptures, rebuking sin in another believer, and striving for holiness as Christ called for?

2. Do liberal Christians reject the concept of sin altogether and claim it's merely "personal interpretation"?

3. Do liberal Christians bash evangelicals about striving for holiness?

4. Do liberal Christians believe the only passages in the Bible that pertain to them are the ones in red print and everything else was merely the jaded opinions of men?

5. Do liberal Christians believe all paths lead to heaven, even if they are paths that blatantly disregard God's authority and supremacy?

6. Do liberal Christians believe all one must do is believe Jesus existed and be tolerant in order to profess Christianity?

7. Do liberal Christians believe it's okay to support things that are the complete antithesis to the Scriptures, all for the sake of being tolerant and loving?

8. Do liberal Christians act and speak in a manner befitting of a Christian (being separate from the world, being in the world, but not of the world), or would no one readily identify them as a Christian based on the words and deeds alone? Would someone be shocked to discover this person is a professing Christian?

9. Do liberal Christians prefer the company of liberal non-christians, because they're so open-minded, than actual believers?

More spin? Can you get off your high horse. I haven't had a terrible tone with you, but you continue to have one with me. It seems the only one bashing anyone in our conversation is you. Yet you cry the part of victim while doing the bashing. Give me a break.

Again, I'll discuss scripture with you any day. But I'm not going have a philosophical discussion about your 9 points. I'm a scripture dude. You have a liberal who loves scripture talking to you, but all you do is attack and belittle. Remarkable.

Instead of pursuing holiness, why not pursue kindness first.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,497
157
43
Atlanta, GA
✟24,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
More spin? Can you get off your high horse. I haven't had a terrible tone with you, but you continue to have one with me. It seems the only one bashing anyone in our conversation is you. Yet you cry the part of victim while doing the bashing. Give me a break.

I never stated I was a victim, but you are a liberal on conservative turf attempting to "re-educate" us on how we think and it's against the rules. Granted, I think some of our folks have gone over to your board and done the same thing in retaliation (tsk tsk) and things only go downhill from here.

Again, I'll discuss scripture with you any day. But I'm not going have a philosophical discussion about your 9 points. I'm a scripture dude. You have a liberal who loves scripture talking to you, but all you do is attack and belittle. Remarkable.

But this thread wasn't initially about Scriptures. I think the issue of Scripture came up when everyone started throwing around the topic of homosexuality (which is a tedious one I don't wish to delve into, plus that too is against the rules). We're talking about the character traits of liberal Christians, which is what most people from the other side popping in have had an objection to. If you are a liberal Christian, then surely you can answer these questions. Feel free to include Scripture references if you'd like.

Instead of pursuing holiness, why not pursue kindness first.

I'm working on patience first. It tends to run thin in these debates, particularly when everyone gets to talking in circles.
 
Upvote 0

mwood30

Mickey
Dec 13, 2009
814
19
Visit site
✟16,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I never stated I was a victim, but you are a liberal on conservative turf attempting to "re-educate" us on how we think and it's against the rules. Granted, I think some of our folks have gone over to your board and done the same thing in retaliation (tsk tsk) and things only go downhill from here.



But this thread wasn't initially about Scriptures. I think the issue of Scripture came up when everyone started throwing around the topic of homosexuality (which is a tedious one I don't wish to delve into, plus that too is against the rules). We're talking about the character traits of liberal Christians, which is what most people from the other side popping in have had an objection to. If you are a liberal Christian, then surely you can answer these questions. Feel free to include Scripture references if you'd like.



I'm working on patience first. It tends to run thin in these debates, particularly when everyone gets to talking in circles.

Yes, we're talking about the traits of liberal Christians as if there's some cloning stamp. Some conservatives are very reasonable, rational, kind hearted people, and some aren't. Same goes for liberals.

Just as the irrational conservative fringe gets cast as the general conservative population, so too does the irrational liberal fringe get cast as the general liberal population.

You're right that this isn't a scripture thread. It's a thread to let people make up straw liberals and then enjoy knocking them down. But here's a suggestion, how about starting a thread on a conservative forum to discuss scripture with liberals. And don't assume that they are spinning (and I bet you'll find they won't consider you spinning too). Yes, challenge each other to see who's reading the passage right (word meanings based on historical usage, understand the message in light of the culture in which was written, read entire passages instead of verses, etc.) Maybe after you participate in that thread, you might have a different view of liberals. Maybe.

If you're ever curious why tens of millions of Christians believe the Golden Rule is the Bible itself, start a scripture thread. Come, let us reason together.
 
Upvote 0

religious&reasonable

Slayer of Stupid Threads
Feb 16, 2011
736
34
✟8,589.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
More spin. See, you even attempt to spin my mention of spin. It's okay, it's a typical liberal trait so I'll overlook it and attempt to get to my point. Since you cannot answer my very simple questions, I'll post them again so as not to be missed among a giant wall of text:

1. Do liberal Christians reject the concepts of regeneration of the Holy Spirit, eternal separation from God due to rejecting Christ (hell), the in errancy of the Scriptures, rebuking sin in another believer, and striving for holiness as Christ called for?

2. Do liberal Christians reject the concept of sin altogether and claim it's merely "personal interpretation"?

3. Do liberal Christians bash evangelicals about striving for holiness?

4. Do liberal Christians believe the only passages in the Bible that pertain to them are the ones in red print and everything else was merely the jaded opinions of men?

5. Do liberal Christians believe all paths lead to heaven, even if they are paths that blatantly disregard God's authority and supremacy?

6. Do liberal Christians believe all one must do is believe Jesus existed and be tolerant in order to profess Christianity?

7. Do liberal Christians believe it's okay to support things that are the complete antithesis to the Scriptures, all for the sake of being tolerant and loving?

8. Do liberal Christians act and speak in a manner befitting of a Christian (being separate from the world, being in the world, but not of the world), or would no one readily identify them as a Christian based on the words and deeds alone? Would someone be shocked to discover this person is a professing Christian?

9. Do liberal Christians prefer the company of liberal non-christians, because they're so open-minded, than actual believers?

HOLY GENERALIZATIONS BATMAN!

You relaize that each answer to those questions will be different depending on the inividual, regardless of being conservative or liberal.

I'll answer them anyway. my answers do not reflect those of all liberal christians, it would be wise to not assume that.

1: No

2: lol a definite no

3: No

4: Some might, most I know don't.

5: Some might, most that I know don't.

6: once again, some do, some don't.

7: no

8: some do, some don't, same a conservatives.

9: Too many generalizations to answer. Some might have a preferance in talking to non-believes, i don't know. A non-believer can be just as arrogant and close-minded as a christian can and vice versa. Just as a christian can be just as open-minded as a non-believer can.

You realize that each of those questions come down to personal belief and isn't a "right" or "left" thing. either side can vot eyes or no on them and still be their side.
 
Upvote 0

katautumn

Prodigal Daughter
May 14, 2015
7,497
157
43
Atlanta, GA
✟24,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Generalizations are what got both sides into this mess in the first place. If one group does not want to be generalized, then perhaps they shouldn't be so quick to make generalizations themselves. I saw plenty of generalizations in that thread - conservatives don't really understand the Bible, conservatives are mean, conservatives only think what their pastors tell them to, conservatives don't like to be questioned, conservatives don't think logically, conservatives refuse to do research, conservatives are closed-minded, the list goes on and on. And then when the generalizations are pointed out, people claim, "well, it's just what we see!"

So which is it? Are these generalizations unfounded or are they rooted in truth? The questions I posed above are based directly on my reading of posts by people who profess to be liberal Christians. They spend such a great deal of time debating against the core tenets of Christianity that one might wonder why they would profess a faith that seems to create such a visceral reaction amongst them.
 
Upvote 0

religious&reasonable

Slayer of Stupid Threads
Feb 16, 2011
736
34
✟8,589.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Generalizations are what got both sides into this mess in the first place. If one group does not want to be generalized, then perhaps they shouldn't be so quick to make generalizations themselves. I saw plenty of generalizations in that thread - conservatives don't really understand the Bible, conservatives are mean, conservatives only think what their pastors tell them to, conservatives don't like to be questioned, conservatives don't think logically, conservatives refuse to do research, conservatives are closed-minded, the list goes on and on. And then when the generalizations are pointed out, people claim, "well, it's just what we see!"

So which is it? Are these generalizations unfounded or are they rooted in truth? The questions I posed above are based directly on my reading of posts by people who profess to be liberal Christians. They spend such a great deal of time debating against the core tenets of Christianity that one might wonder why they would profess a faith that seems to create such a visceral reaction amongst them.

Yes, contrary to some belief, there are unreasonable liberal christians aswell. No group is spared from the disease of human irrationality and stupidity. The Christians making those generalizations were wrong to do so.

I do believe there is some (a very very small) amount of truth rooted in generalizations and stereotypes, but it's still irrational to use them in an actual arguement.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

mwood30

Mickey
Dec 13, 2009
814
19
Visit site
✟16,051.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
They spend such a great deal of time debating against the core tenets of Christianity that one might wonder why they would profess a faith that seems to create such a visceral reaction amongst them.

Plenty of conservatives would agree that embracing 'Christ' is the goal, so tenets in and of themselves only have merit as long as they can be shown to be reflective of what Jesus taught. If they agree with Jesus, they're awesome. If they don't agree with Jesus, they're awful.
 
Upvote 0

QuakerOats

— ♥ — Living in Love — ♥ —
Feb 8, 2007
2,183
195
Ontario, Canada
✟18,314.00
Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Greens
Generalizations are what got both sides into this mess in the first place. If one group does not want to be generalized, then perhaps they shouldn't be so quick to make generalizations themselves. I saw plenty of generalizations in that thread - conservatives don't really understand the Bible, conservatives are mean, conservatives only think what their pastors tell them to, conservatives don't like to be questioned, conservatives don't think logically, conservatives refuse to do research, conservatives are closed-minded, the list goes on and on. And then when the generalizations are pointed out, people claim, "well, it's just what we see!"

So which is it? Are these generalizations unfounded or are they rooted in truth? The questions I posed above are based directly on my reading of posts by people who profess to be liberal Christians. They spend such a great deal of time debating against the core tenets of Christianity that one might wonder why they would profess a faith that seems to create such a visceral reaction amongst them.
I agree, generalizing a group of people does us no good, and we'd all do well to remember that, liberal and conservative alike. It's only too easy to take the most vocal of a group and paint everyone with that same brush.

Also, I don't think we at WWMC spend more time and effort debating Christianity than any of the other faith groups represented here. A good many of us simply take a broader view of what it means to be a Christian, which tends to put us at odds, for better or worse. While it's certainly no excuse, know that many liberal Christians come to WWMC angry due to being rejected by several of their more conservative peers. It's not a statement about conservatives as a whole, simply a matter of their experience. It's easier to take that anger and project it onto the entire group in order to feel justified. The OP mentioned that she was sad to see Christians 'so liberal in their morals, thinking etc.,' so obviously there are conservatives who've felt a similar kind of anger to what I'm speaking of. As I mentioned in the beginning, I think we all need to practice not projecting that anger onto an entire group
.

The answer to all your questions, btw, as some have already mentioned, is that it depends on the individual. There are those who fit your descriptions, both wholly and in part, and those who don't.
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

God is bigger than the boogeyman!
Mar 18, 2004
70,094
7,684
Raxacoricofallapatorius
Visit site
✟119,554.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
You are misreading the very simple sentence structure of 1 Corinthians 6:9 because you have been taught to do so. Let me explain.

Consider this sentence: I go crazy for women: blondes, brunettes, and red heads.

Now answer me this: Do I go crazy for blonde dudes? Brunette dudes? Red headed dudes?

No way! And you know it from the sentence. I'm giving a list which is based upon my larger statement. It's that easy. So it is with 1 Corinthians 6:9.

No person who treats others unjustly will inherit the kingdom of God: A, B, C, D, E.

Is the verse referring to all of A? Only if you think I'm attracted to blonde dudes! You've been misreading the passage and overlooking the message. Every single person on that list was the epitome of unjust treatment of others in 1st century Corinth.

Maybe there are other verses that contradict what I teach, but this isn't one of them in the Greek. In fact, it's the opposite. It teaches exactly what I'm saying.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10 include persons who do not fall under "treat others the way you want to be treated". Idolators and drunkards, for example. It is speaking to the state of the heart, not necessarily to how you treat others. The point that is trying to be made is that if you have been touched by God and He has changed your heart from one of stone to one of flesh, then you will not have a desire to do unGodly things. And treating others the way you want to be treated will be a natural outcome of it, but so will other activities (or rather, lack of activities).
 
Upvote 0

A New Dawn

God is bigger than the boogeyman!
Mar 18, 2004
70,094
7,684
Raxacoricofallapatorius
Visit site
✟119,554.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
I am reminded of the parable Jesus told about the good samaritan.

The priest and the scribe were too holy to help the injured man and walked on by. They didnt want to commit any sins, perhaps it was all just a cover for their own prejudicies. By trying not to defile themselves they sinned in the worst possible way.

But the good samaritan stopped, poured in the oil and the wine and helped the man.

Lets give this parable a modern slant.

There was a baptist driving to his sunday service who swerved to miss a cat crossing the road and went into a tree. The baptist was now injured and called out for help.

A car load of other baptists drove by but didnt stop because they didnt want to be late for church. Being late would make them look unholy.

The assistant pastor drove by but didnt stop because he wanted to be seen at church, he hoped to be made full pastor one day. Not being on the platform at kick off time would make him seem unholy.

Finally two lesbians drove by and stopped, they called 911 and put the injured man in the recovery position. Later in the hospital they waited to see if the man was ok.

Now which of these was a good neighbour to the man?

:)

Then I would say that the first two examples weren't really Christian except in name only, and the last example was showing what a good neighbor looked like. However, the story is only about who is our neighbor, not who is a Christian. Jesus never intended for the story to take on any other meaning than who our neighbor is.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

A New Dawn

God is bigger than the boogeyman!
Mar 18, 2004
70,094
7,684
Raxacoricofallapatorius
Visit site
✟119,554.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
As for the Greek, yes, that's a big difference. To get a degree in theology from a liberal university, you must be able to read the Bible in Greek. Most conservative pastors cannot. The Greek is the final authority.

I would like to address this ........... I believe you are incorrect about it. I believe it is a requirement of anyone graduating from a seminary that they know how to read the Bible in Greek. There are certainly a lot of conservative pastors here on CF that know how to do just that. And they'll be right up here with us saying that it is often misinterpreted by liberals.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.