Calenlanthir
I Love Legolas
And chapter 14 of 1 Corinthians, talks about Prophecy and tounges.
Upvote
0
Originally posted by StogusMaximus
That is completely relevant.
Why didn't Jesus say,"This, then, is how you should pray: Blaa blaaa Blaaa, Yaaada Yaaaada Yaaada, See My BowTie, Tie My BowTie, Blaa Blaa Blaaa, Amen".
Speaking in tongues had it's time and purpose, God wants us to speak to him in our own language. He doesn't not give select people a special language "hotline" to Him.
Originally posted by Droobie
There is a difference between speaking in tongues and praying in tongues.
Now, with speaking in tongues, it is usually when God has a message for someone in the congregation/gathering, whether it be in tongues in another language, or as a scripture, God will also provide an interpreter, or it may be the person themselves who can relay the message.
Praying in tongues is not directed at anyone in particular, and is the voice of the Spirit within you, speaking out when you pray. People who pray in tongues for the first time do not know the words, that's why it may sound like gibberish. Kind of like a baby learning to talk.
Bear in mind, this is a gift of the Holy Spirit that not everyone has. Each person has different spiritual giftings.
God Bless
I believe the gifts of the Spirit are given to us to serve a purpose, not for our personal use. The gifts of the Spirit are to be used for God's purpose.
Originally posted by Josephus
"Speaking in tongues was used in the days of the disciples to spread the word about Jesus to foreign lands."
Actually, I don't think that was always the case. In fact if I recall, I believe tongues were only used once in that way only, as they are only recorded once being used in that fashion: being a "known" tongue in Acts 2. In other places of the bible tongues are mentioned as needing an intepretation because they are "unknown." Everyone in the early church, not just the Disciples themselves, spoke in tongues and exercised other gifts. This included the lay people, the newborn converts, street preachers, leaders, servants, masters, slaves... men, women, children, the list goes on.
Unknown tongues edify the church when interpreted. They only edify the person when there is none. Paul said both reasons were good. It is when one uses tongues for prideful purposes, however, that it is wrong...aka they have no love.
Originally posted by tericl2
This is an excellent debate on this topic! Everyone has great points.
I personally speak in tongues. I have never done so in public.
I agree with Stogus that tongues (at least the more public idea) is used unscripturally. In too many churches i have been to it is just a distraction, which is very specifically what Paul taught against.
I also like your point, Solo. I hadn't thought about it from the pride perspective, but it certainly seems to be a logical conclusion. We all have to be ever diligent in not falling into pride in all areas. That kinda hit me between the eyes so maybe I needed to see that. Thanks.
You are welcomed. I am too familiar with pride myself. I always am looking out for it, because it just comes so naturally to me.