Howard Cneal

Well-Known Member
Oct 26, 2010
1,165
110
✟16,809.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I will share my story.

66 pounds ago I was a meat eater and dairy drinker. My blood pressure was through the roof, highest was 159/99. My hormones (estrogen mainly) were so out of whack that I "late" 10 months (no I was no pregnant) and my doctor said that if something didn't change I would most likely have a stroke, heart attack or develop diabetes.

I made the decision the day I went to the doctor and heard this news to cut out meat. Just meat. I still wasn't very active physically. I ate whatever else I wanted. I had a follow up doctors appointment the next week. In 7 days, 10lbs were gone. My blood pressure was already lower. 147/91 though still high.

Two weeks later, my 10 months being "late" were done. I have not had a problem in that area since.

Over the course of the last year, I went from vegetarianism to veganism. It was a slow transistion but the best decision I've ever made.

I have been vegan (dairy and egg free) now for about 6 months, and having cut out meat a year ago.

My last appointment to my doctor about a month ago revealed a blood pressure of 121/78. I am the healthiest that I have been in years. I am active, energetic and a lot slimmer.

You can call veganism unhealthy all you want. I've taken botany classes, studied up on soy protein and the actual effects of the isoflavones in the soy bean. I know what plant combinations to eat in order to get the 8 of 22 amino acids that my body cannot produce in order to get complete proteins.

I understand your passion on this topic. There are many like you who I have encountered. I don't know why you're posting this. Whether you're trying to change vegans/vegetarians minds or if you are just angry over it for some reason.

I posted this in the IJWTS thread. I hope you take these verses into consideration.

From Romans 14
3 Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him.

and

15 Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let your good be spoken of as evil; 17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 For he who serves Christ in these things is acceptable to God and approved by men. 19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense. 21 It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak. 22 Do you have faith? Have it to yourself before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.

(emphasis mine)




I'm kinda confused by this line. In the beginning you state that vegan diets are unhealthy. But here you are saying they are balanced and healthy...

Wow, this is a really good post!

I'm a carnivore, but still... I have to give credit where it is due! Nice.

The fact is, though, if I had to watch an animal be slaughtered before eating it, I would surely not eat meat...
 
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Vegan and vegetarian diets can be very healthy without that much effort (protein is not difficult to find in non-meat sources). But this isn't a topic I'm passionate about, so I'll just let Stravinsk post for me, since this is a topic he is passionate about.


You do realize there is a rather significant difference between complete proteins (animal source) and incomplete proteins (plant source)?
 
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I'm busy at the moment but before I respond I'd like to ask SP this:

What are your thoughts on Daniel 1:8-15?

The Hebrew word (vrs 12) translated "vegetables"(NIV) or "pulse"(KJV) is actually a word which means "that which is sown" - things that are sown are seeds, beans, nuts, wholegrains. So it's safe to assume that Daniel and his men were eating these instead of "the king's meats" -and presumably what grows from them (fruit and vegetables).

Is it just a story or is it true? If true, is it your opinion that the human body has changed significantly since then to *need* to eat animal products?

This isn't a theological topic, and as far as I know the Bible isn't a work designed to deal with optimal nutrition.
 
Upvote 0

Scottish Knight

Veteran
Feb 17, 2010
1,602
221
Scotland
✟10,580.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
I will share my story.

66 pounds ago I was a meat eater and dairy drinker. My blood pressure was through the roof, highest was 159/99. My hormones (estrogen mainly) were so out of whack that I "late" 10 months (no I was no pregnant) and my doctor said that if something didn't change I would most likely have a stroke, heart attack or develop diabetes.

I made the decision the day I went to the doctor and heard this news to cut out meat. Just meat. I still wasn't very active physically. I ate whatever else I wanted. I had a follow up doctors appointment the next week. In 7 days, 10lbs were gone. My blood pressure was already lower. 147/91 though still high.

Two weeks later, my 10 months being "late" were done. I have not had a problem in that area since.

Over the course of the last year, I went from vegetarianism to veganism. It was a slow transistion but the best decision I've ever made.

I have been vegan (dairy and egg free) now for about 6 months, and having cut out meat a year ago.

My last appointment to my doctor about a month ago revealed a blood pressure of 121/78. I am the healthiest that I have been in years. I am active, energetic and a lot slimmer.

You can call veganism unhealthy all you want. I've taken botany classes, studied up on soy protein and the actual effects of the isoflavones in the soy bean. I know what plant combinations to eat in order to get the 8 of 22 amino acids that my body cannot produce in order to get complete proteins.

I understand your passion on this topic. There are many like you who I have encountered. I don't know why you're posting this. Whether you're trying to change vegans/vegetarians minds or if you are just angry over it for some reason.

I posted this in the IJWTS thread. I hope you take these verses into consideration.

From Romans 14
3 Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him.

and

15 Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let your good be spoken of as evil; 17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 For he who serves Christ in these things is acceptable to God and approved by men. 19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense. 21 It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak. 22 Do you have faith? Have it to yourself before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.

(emphasis mine)




I'm kinda confused by this line. In the beginning you state that vegan diets are unhealthy. But here you are saying they are balanced and healthy...

I admire anyone with the self-control to be able to do this. Most of us could probably do with eating more fruit and veggies but there's no way I could give up meat completely.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
But we can choose to say "eat what you want, I'll eat what I want, I'm not going to waste time fighting about either one". If other people choose to engage the OP's challenge, more power to em.

Then why not really conserve your time and not post if you have nothing to add to the discussion?
 
Upvote 0

Stravinsk

Neo Baroque/Rococo Classical Artist
Mar 4, 2009
6,153
797
Australia
✟9,955.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Politics
US-Libertarian
This isn't a theological topic, and as far as I know the Bible isn't a work designed to deal with optimal nutrition.

That's not what I asked you. Do you believe the story is true or not? If it is true, then do you believe humans nutritional needs have changed since the time of Daniel?

The topic at hand isn't a theological topic - but you are asking people with theological beliefs - some of which pertain to food.

Is it too hard to answer the simple questions I put forth? If it is, then I don't see why I should bother going further, since it will be apparent to me that your views are already fixed like cement.
 
Upvote 0

k450ofu3k-gh-5ipe

Senior Member
Apr 3, 2008
2,153
137
✟10,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That's not what I asked you. Do you believe the story is true or not? If it is true, then do you believe humans nutritional needs have changed since the time of Daniel?

The topic at hand isn't a theological topic - but you are asking people with theological beliefs - some of which pertain to food.

Is it too hard to answer the simple questions I put forth? If it is, then I don't see why I should bother going further, since it will be apparent to me that your views are already fixed like cement.
Now don't get me wrong. I have zero problem with vegans, vegetarians, or meat eaters. I am just responding to you because you're misrepresenting the story in Daniel.

The story in Daniel has nothing to do with the fact that the king's food had meat in it. It had everything to do with the fact that it was food/meat that had been offered up as sacrifice to idols. Daniel and his friends were obeying God's command to not eat meat that had been offered up to false gods.

They weren't staying away from the king's food because of health reasons--they were staying away from it due to obedience to God. Because of their obedience, God blessed them with good health even if their alternative diet wasn't necessarily the most nutritionally sound diet. It was a miracle that their health thrived--God's power was shown in their thriving health despite their poor nutrition. That is why their care taker was so surprised by how they thrived so much. Their alternative diet was not ideal nor nutritional.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tamara224
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I will share my story.

66 pounds ago I was a meat eater and dairy drinker. My blood pressure was through the roof, highest was 159/99. My hormones (estrogen mainly) were so out of whack that I "late" 10 months (no I was no pregnant) and my doctor said that if something didn't change I would most likely have a stroke, heart attack or develop diabetes.

I made the decision the day I went to the doctor and heard this news to cut out meat. Just meat. I still wasn't very active physically. I ate whatever else I wanted. I had a follow up doctors appointment the next week. In 7 days, 10lbs were gone. My blood pressure was already lower. 147/91 though still high.

Two weeks later, my 10 months being "late" were done. I have not had a problem in that area since.

Over the course of the last year, I went from vegetarianism to veganism. It was a slow transistion but the best decision I've ever made.

I have been vegan (dairy and egg free) now for about 6 months, and having cut out meat a year ago.

My last appointment to my doctor about a month ago revealed a blood pressure of 121/78. I am the healthiest that I have been in years. I am active, energetic and a lot slimmer.

You can call veganism unhealthy all you want. I've taken botany classes, studied up on soy protein and the actual effects of the isoflavones in the soy bean. I know what plant combinations to eat in order to get the 8 of 22 amino acids that my body cannot produce in order to get complete proteins.

I understand your passion on this topic. There are many like you who I have encountered. I don't know why you're posting this. Whether you're trying to change vegans/vegetarians minds or if you are just angry over it for some reason.

I posted this in the IJWTS thread. I hope you take these verses into consideration.

From Romans 14
3 Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him.

and

Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let your good be spoken of as evil; 17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 For he who serves Christ in these things is acceptable to God and approved by men. 19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense. 21 It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak. 22 Do you have faith? Have it to yourself before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin. [/COLOR]


This isn't a theological topic, it's not about being vegan means you're going to hell. It's not about "fighting" with anyone. It's about having a discussion, which I think is an interesting one. Not to mention a nice break from discussing what strategies a person might employ to get a date, or what kinds of things a person much accomplish to be worthy of you.

Here's the issue with your story: inactivity. Yes, when you're not doing much of anything then you aren't taxing your muscles. You're body won't need a great deal of protein to rebuild them, and if you aren't using the energy the fat content can be a problem. A lot of westerns can skate by on veg/vegan diets exactly because they don't lead very active lifestyles. Of course there still are the amino acids that the human body simply cannot process from plant sources, and protein remains an issue.

Before sighting soy as the wonder solution you may want to consider a lot of the recent research concerning soy. It's not a very healthy product, given the estrogen spikes it causes and immune function issues. High levels of estrogen are also noted to be factors in a number of cancers. Research also shows that vegans/veggies are prone to fill the gaps in their diets with large amounts of carbs, which is obviously not a healthy choice.

The primary issue is that when people are as active as they should be it's when notable problems with the vegan/veg diet start to show up. Just out of curiosity do you, even now, have 5 or more intense bouts of exercise in a week?


I'm kinda confused by this line. In the beginning you state that vegan diets are unhealthy. But here you are saying they are balanced and healthy...[/QUOTE]

It was a typo.
 
Upvote 0

Keri

Well-Known Member
Jan 1, 2006
21,131
4,240
✟51,653.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
I forgot to tell you that in the beginning, the first 3 months, I wasn't active. For the past 9 months or so, I've been active through hiking and going to the gym. Along with my vegan diet, this has helped me lose weight, tone my body and get healthier.

Sorry for not including this. I wasn't aware that this was about exercise. It thought it was about diet.

Now you can edit your post to respond properly to mine. :)


You might want to re-read my post. No where did I say this was a theological debate. I also never mentioned fighting or debating. The verses I gave you are in regards to "Romans 14:3-- Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
That's not what I asked you. Do you believe the story is true or not? If it is true, then do you believe humans nutritional needs have changed since the time of Daniel?

The topic at hand isn't a theological topic - but you are asking people with theological beliefs - some of which pertain to food.

Is it too hard to answer the simple questions I put forth? If it is, then I don't see why I should bother going further, since it will be apparent to me that your views are already fixed like cement.

It's a story about people that ate vegetables for 10 days. Going without meat for 10 days isn't going to kill anyone. Obviously someone that engages in regular vigorous exercise, or has a physically demanding job, would certainly notice the difference. However, someone that lived in a royal court and didn't do much in the way of physical activity certainly could appear healthier after 10 days without consuming proteins and fat they don't need due to inactivity. So sure, the story is true, but it's hardly proof of the merits of vegan diet. What do you think would happen to a professional football player, or a powerlifter, on a prolonged vegan diet?
 
Upvote 0

Stravinsk

Neo Baroque/Rococo Classical Artist
Mar 4, 2009
6,153
797
Australia
✟9,955.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Politics
US-Libertarian
Now don't get me wrong. I have zero problem with vegans, vegetarians, or meat eaters. I am just responding to you because you're misrepresenting the story in Daniel.

The story in Daniel has nothing to do with the fact that the king's food had meat in it. It had everything to do with the fact that it was food/meat that had been offered up as sacrifice to idols. Daniel and his friends were obeying God's command to not eat meat that had been offered up to false gods.

Interpolation. It isn't about "meat" and it isn't about "idols". I don't see in the text anywhere about Daniel and his men abstaining because it was "offered up to idols". This is something you have simply assumed - it is not part of the text.

They weren't staying away from the king's food because of health reasons--they were staying away from it due to obedience to God. Because of their obedience, God blessed them with good health even if their alternative diet wasn't necessarily the most nutritionally sound diet. It was a miracle that their health thrived--God's power was shown in their thriving health despite their poor nutrition. That is why their care taker was so surprised by how they thrived so much. Their alternative diet was not ideal nor nutritional.

You are correct about the obedience. But let's consider the context. This is a BABYLONIAN King. Not a Jew - and therefore, would not know nor subject himself or his subjects to Jewish food laws. Daniel, however was a Jew - and a Prophet to boot.

Given the fact that vegetables/fruits/beans/seeds etc could ALSO have been "offered up to idols"

...then it is not logical to assume this was the reason for Daniel and his men to abstain.

The only reason left is that the "King's meats" included things that were unclean for Jews to eat - things like Pork and Shellfish.

The "moral" of the story isn't that God magically changed Daniel's and his men's nutritional requirements for a short time. The moral of the story is one of health for the human body.

Don't forget the fact that after Daniel and his men were all healthier after 10 days of this diet - the steward put ALL the king's men on the same diet thereafter!(vrs 15-16)
 
Upvote 0

LOVEthroughINTELLECT

The courage to be human
Jul 30, 2005
7,825
403
✟25,873.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Why can't everybody just accept that there is not one diet that is right for everybody?

Just like there is not one right parenting style or one right path to economic security. Just like there is not one right way to win a championship in the National Football League or one right way to run a business. Just like there is not one right way to study history or one right way to design a city. Just like there is not one right way to organize one's home or one right way to style people's hair.

"Optimal" is relative. It depends on one's values, goals, desired outcomes, etc. And even when two people have similar values, goals, desired outcomes, etc. those things can be realized in different ways.

Just because it works for you does not make it right or ideal for everybody.

The challenge is to not do things the wrong way. Don't cheat to win an NFL championship. Don't violate people's rights when planning the design of your city. Don't spend money on getting the hairstyle that you want instead of spending the money to feed your kids. Etc.

People's diets and health are public concerns. But at the same time they are very personal, and to a great extent private, matters. Trying to tell everybody how they should eat is like trying to tell everybody how often they should read a book. Intellectual activity may reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease, but nobody is absurd enough to think that everybody should throw away their TV sets and read books all day. There is an intellectual element to TV viewing anyway. Again, there is more than one way to realize a desired outcome.

How about simply educating people about the available choices and then leaving it up to them to find what yields the "optimal"?

Or is this really about things like cruelty to animals, not the optimal diet?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I forgot to tell you that in the beginning, the first 3 months, I wasn't active. For the past 9 months or so, I've been active through hiking and going to the gym. Along with my vegan diet, this has helped me lose weight, tone my body and get healthier.

Sorry for not including this. I wasn't aware that this was about exercise. It thought it was about diet.

Now you can edit your post to respond properly to mine. :)


You might want to re-read my post. No where did I say this was a theological debate. I also never mentioned fighting or debating. The verses I gave you are in regards to "Romans 14:3-- Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him."

You cited verses about Judaizers in the early Church attacking gentile Christians as being unclean for eating certain food. I'm discussing optimal nutrition which has absolutely nothing to do the verses you sited. If I were implying you were out of sorts with God for being a vegan you'd have a point. No one is, just discussing optimal nutrition.

Of course exercise has a lot to do with a person's dietary needs. There's a difference between what someone that is relatively inactive can eat and be fine with, and what someone who regularly exercises with a great deal of intensity. I went though basic training with a vegetarian, in the first four weeks he lost two pant sizes, and he was hardly heavy set to be begin with, and ended up collapsing during PT. The doctors talked him into eating chicken and after a brief recovery period he was fine. Obviously if you go hiking and maybe do some cardio in the gym it might not affect you terribly. But someone that engages in more rigorous exercise would have a very different outcome with a vegan diet.
 
Upvote 0

Stravinsk

Neo Baroque/Rococo Classical Artist
Mar 4, 2009
6,153
797
Australia
✟9,955.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Politics
US-Libertarian
It's a story about people that ate vegetables for 10 days. Going without meat for 10 days isn't going to kill anyone. Obviously someone that engages in regular vigorous exercise, or has a physically demanding job, would certainly notice the difference. However, someone that lived in a royal court and didn't do much in the way of physical activity certainly could appear healthier after 10 days without consuming proteins and fat they don't need due to inactivity. So sure, the story is true, but it's hardly proof of the merits of vegan diet. What do you think would happen to a professional football player, or a powerlifter, on a prolonged vegan diet?

No, the Hebrew word means "that which is sown" - NOT vegetables as is commonly translated in modern English versions. You don't plant vegetables in the ground - the life to create trees and plants and more vegetables is found in the SEEDS. Under this definition, things such as nuts and beans are included - together with sun, soil and water - they have the life to sustain all of us.

And no, it's not just 10 days. The steward(guard) in charge of what everyone got (not just Daniel and his men) put ALL the King's men on the same diet after Daniel's test (vrs 15-16).

As for vegan lifters/athletes etc - have you ever heard of:

cheekepic.jpg


Robert Cheek?

Or how about this guy?

YouTube - 72 Year-Old Man Body Building Every Day

Not bad for a 72 year old eh?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Inkachu

Bursting with fruit flavor!
Jan 31, 2008
35,357
4,217
Somewhere between Rivendell and Rohan
✟62,966.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Then why not really conserve your time and not post if you have nothing to add to the discussion?

Because it only takes me about 10 seconds to type a post like this, and I did add something, hence the several who've quoted my first post :)
 
Upvote 0

HighwayMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 7, 2007
2,829
256
✟17,617.00
Country
United States
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
To avoid taking over an unrelated thread, I thought I'd just start a new one. It always fascinates me to no end when vegetarians/vegans insist on implying that these diets are healthy for you.

There's a reason why Trader Joe's, and every other store that caters to vegans, have huge sections devoted to dietary supplements. Vegans have to work around the lack of complete proteins in non-animal sources through supplements because you're not eating something your body needs. The other solution revolves around eating large amounts of soy products. Soy has been linked to high levels of estrogen and negative impacts on the immune system. It should not be eaten in the quantities that many vegans consume them. There are also a few essential amino acids that the human body cannot process from non-animal sources, as well as B vitamin deficiencies that are a common problem for vegans.

Humans are omnivores and like all such animals depend on both plant and animal sources for our nutritional requirements. If you oppose eating meat for cruelty reasons that's a personal conviction that can't really be argued. On a nutritional level vegan diets are balanced and healthy diets for human beings.

There are alternatives to soy products, and the fact that vegans need supplements does not in any way shape or form mean that the diets are unhealthy. Meat eaters have to deal with many risk factors associated with eating large quantities of meat, and every single statistic out there will tell you that Americans especially eat way, way too much meat, that is not only unhealthy for them, but creates huge problems for the environment, and contributes to inexplicable amounts of slaughterhouse cruelty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wren
Upvote 0

LOVEthroughINTELLECT

The courage to be human
Jul 30, 2005
7,825
403
✟25,873.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
With respect to our diets, everything that I have been reading lately points to something other than animal products as the primary source of a lot of public health problems: refined sugars.

In other words, use dairy milk or soy milk, just not the chocolate or vanilla varieties with added sugars.

Problem solved.

Until the next article in a medical science journal is published, that is.

Complicated issues. Best to let people find the right way for themselves.
 
Upvote 0

SneakerPimp53

Becoming X
Jan 14, 2011
385
37
The 'rents' basement
✟15,724.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
People's diets and health are public concerns. But at the same time they are very personal, and to a great extent private, matters. Trying to tell everybody how they should eat is like trying to tell everybody how often they should read a book. Intellectual activity may reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease, but nobody is absurd enough to think that everybody should throw away their TV sets and read books all day. There is an intellectual element to TV viewing anyway. Again, there is more than one way to realize a desired outcome.

How about simply educating people about the available choices and then leaving it up to them to find what yields the "optimal"?

Or is this really about things like cruelty to animals, not the optimal diet?

Part of the problem is there isn't much research on vegan/veg diets and the long term implications. Yet vegans/veggies have been selling these diets to the general public for a long time as being healthy. It's in the face of the fact that humans are obviously omnivores, just as are primates in the wild. Completely taking out meat products from a diet of a creature that naturally evolved to require it and calling it healthy seems irresponsible to me.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

k450ofu3k-gh-5ipe

Senior Member
Apr 3, 2008
2,153
137
✟10,458.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Interpolation. It isn't about "meat" and it isn't about "idols". I don't see in the text anywhere about Daniel and his men abstaining because it was "offered up to idols". This is something you have simply assumed - it is not part of the text.
I have not assumed it. It is the backdrop of the story which all Biblical commentaries state. Just because the passage doesn't state the reasons forthright it doesn't mean that their aren't logical reasons.

You are correct about the obedience. But let's consider the context. This is a BABYLONIAN King. Not a Jew - and therefore, would not know nor subject himself or his subjects to Jewish food laws. Daniel, however was a Jew - and a Prophet to boot.
Yes, you are correct. I was only stating one of the reasons they would not have eaten the food. Here are the reasons given by Biblical scholars on this passage for Daniel and his friends not eating the food:

(1) It is not improbable that the food which was offered him had been, in some way, connected with idolatry, and that his participation in it would be construed as countenancing the worship of idols. - Calvin. It is known that a part of the animals offered in sacrifice was sold in the market; and known, also, that splendid entertainments were often made in honor of particular idols, and on the sacrifices which had been offered to them. Compare 1 Corinthians 8:1-13. Doubtless, also, a considerable part of the food which was served up at the royal table consisted of articles which, by the Jewish law, were prohibited as unclean. It was represented by the prophets, as one part of the evils of a captivity in a foreign land, that the people would be under a necessity of eating what was regarded as unclean. Thus, in Ezekiel 4:13 : "And the Lord said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them." Hosea 9:3 : "they shall not dwell in the Lord's land, but Ephraim shall return to Egypt; and shall eat unclean things in Assyria." Rosenmuller remarks on this passage ("Alte u. neue Morgenland," 1076), "It was customary among the ancients to bring a portion of what was eaten and drank as an offering to the gods, as a sign of thankful recognition that all which men enjoy is their gift. Among the Romans these gifts were called "libamina," so that with each meal there was connected an act of offering. Hence Daniel and his friends regarded what was brought from the royal table as food which had been offered to the gods, and therefore as impure."
(2) Daniel and his friends were, doubtless, restrained from partaking of the food and drink offered to them by a regard to the principles of temperance in which they had been educated, and by a fear of the consequences which would follow from indulgence. They had evidently been trained in the ways of strict temperance. But now new scenes opened to them, and new temptations were before them. They were among strangers. They were noticed and flattered. They had an opportunity of indulging in the pleasures of the table, such as captive youth rarely enjoyed. This opportunity, there can be no doubt, they regarded as a temptation to their virtue, and as in the highest degree perilous to their principles, and they, therefore, sought to resist the temptation. They were captives - exiles from their country - in circumstances of great depression and humiliation, and they did not wish to forget that circumstance. - Calvin. Their land was in ruins; the temple where they and their fathers had worshipped had been desecrated and plundered; their kindred and countrymen were pining in exile; everything called them to a mode of life which would be in accordance with these melancholy facts, and they, doubtless, felt that it would be in every way inappropriate for them to indulge in luxurious living, and revel in the pleasures of a banquet.
But they were also, doubtless, restrained from these indulgences by a reference to the dangers which would follow. It required not great penetration or experience, indeed, to perceive, that in their circumstances - young men as they were, suddenly noticed and honored - compliance would be perilous to their virtue; but it did require uncommon strength of principle to meet the temptation. Rare has been the stern virtue among young men which could resist so strong allurements; seldom, comparatively, have those who have been unexpectedly thrown, in the course of events, into the temptations of a great city in a foreign land, and flattered by the attention of those in the higher walks of life, been sufficiently firm in principle to assert the early principles of temperance and virtue in which they may have been trained. Rare has it been that a youth in such circumstances would form the steady purpose not to "defile himself" by the tempting allurements set before him, and that, at all hazards, he would adhere to the principles in which he had been educated.



Taken from Daniel 1:8 But Daniel resolved not to defile himself with the royal food and wine, and he asked the chief official for permission not to defile himself this way.
I highlighted the key points. Actually, there are so many key points there, just read the whole thing.


Given the fact that vegetables/fruits/beans/seeds etc could ALSO have been "offered up to idols"

...then it is not logical to assume this was the reason for Daniel and his men to abstain.
The vegetables which were given to Daniel were NOT from the king's table, so they hadn't been offered to idols. Daniel and friends specifically ate food that was not from the king's table. So the vegetables from the king's table--nope, they didn't eat them. I bolded and underlined relevant section above.

The only reason left is that the "King's meats" included things that were unclean for Jews to eat - things like Pork and Shellfish.
Yes, that was one of the reasons that I didn't include because it wasn't as relevant to your claims about the story. See above.

The "moral" of the story isn't that God magically changed Daniel's and his men's nutritional requirements for a short time. The moral of the story is one of health for the human body.
No it is not. The moral is one of obedience to God. Do some reading. Read all the commentaries on this page site regarding the passage and read the excerpt I posted above: Daniel 1:8 But Daniel resolved not to defile himself with the royal food and wine, and he asked the chief official for permission not to defile himself this way.

Don't forget the fact that after Daniel and his men were all healthier after 10 days of this diet
Yes, what you state here was the miracle of the story! Because of their obedience to God, Daniel and his friends, despite a less than ideal diet, excelled.
- the steward put ALL the king's men on the same diet thereafter!(vrs 15-16)
Are you reading the same verses? They DID NOT put ALL the king's men on the same diet. Here are the verses:
15At the end of the ten days they looked healthier and better nourished than any of the young men who ate the royal food. 16So the guard took away their choice food and the wine they were to drink and gave them vegetables instead.
They, they, and them are referring to Daniel and his friends, not EVERYONE. The steward let Daniel and friends do a test period of 10 days, after the ten days, he saw that they were healthier, so he let them go on the new diet permanently. The steward did NOT put ALL the king's men on the same diet.......

I highly recommend you do some research from some well known Biblical scholars on the particular passage in Daniel before you assume that it's about nutrition.
 
Upvote 0