Standing Up
On and on
EXACTLY!! But as usual MEN know better in their own heads then their OWN HEAD (which is Christ)
Ahh, Golgotha was revelation, the place of the skull, renewing the mind
Upvote
0
EXACTLY!! But as usual MEN know better in their own heads then their OWN HEAD (which is Christ)
In that case, I appeal to Caesar!EXACTLY!! But as usual MEN know better in their own heads then their OWN HEAD (which is Christ)
There's a few, mainly in 1 Cor.
And this 1 Tim. 4:3 Forbidding to marry, [and commanding] to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
Hence the connection with forced and it being said, not forced, but if you want to be a priest ...
Speaking of priest, we know from scripture and very early literature (didache, hermas, Polycarp), there was no such office at first.
Wikipedia left out a lot of "sexually active" popes. In particular ones that were supposed to be celibate, but were running brothels out of papal structures in Rome and the countryside.
Does Rodrigo Borgia ring a bell?
And he was just following the long "tradition" of criminal popes.
In that case, I appeal to Caesar!
Acts 25:11 For if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die.
But if there be none of these things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them. I appeal unto Caesar.
Reve 12:10 And I hear great voice in the Heaven saying "now became the salvation and the power and the Kingdom of the God of us, and the authority of the Christ of Him, that was cast the Accuser of the brothers of us, the one-accusing them in sight of the God of us day and night.
[John 5:45]
Gives new meaning to Reve 14:11/19:3
http://www.christianforums.com/t7486696/
The Roman Catholic church is not mystery babylon
Revelation 14:11 And the Smoke of the tormenting of Them is ascending into Ages to-Ages..........
[Luke 16:24,26]
Reve 19:3 And a second-time they have declared "allelouia and the Smoke of Her is ascending into the Ages of the Ages".
[Luke 19:41,44]
OK.....since thou insistA miracle, a post without a link to another converstion
Ahh, Golgotha was revelation, the place of the skull, renewing the mind
In MacArthur's interpretation of scripture?if it is in fact false it would be damning...Places that teach in opposition to scripture may well be damning
Then you reject Calvinism?well this is up for debate, i'll take the true church that actually uses scripture as it's authoratative plumb-line.
Why would I want to prove that the Catholic Church isn't using scripture?Prove it isn't using scripture
Whose plumb line? MacArthur sets his own.well if it's teachings fail the plumbline? where does that position her?
Hebrews says nothing against the priesthood in Jesus' Church.False priesthood, see Hebrews...
The ancient Church does not worship saints in the manner which scripture condemns.straight up against scripture
At least you agree that MacArthur is wrong.See the Psalter of Mary along with many other prayers that exalt her to a nearly deistic identity.
Not Semantics. Entirely different. Semantics works only for those that do not understand.same sacrifice continually...Semantics
Baptism? The quotes were about more than the absolute need for baptism. Abraham wasn't baptized was he? Keep with what he said.the thief on the cross proves that it's a non-essential
He said it, it is your responsibility to prove it not mine to disprove it.Prove this isn't true.
Tetzel died in 1519, what does that have to do with what the CC teaches today. MacArthur is not talking about the past, he is talking in the present tense. He is totally wrong.Yep. See Johan Tetzel, commissioned by the Pope...when a coin in the coffer rings a soul from purgatory doth spring.
A lie.semantics
The Pope worships the head of the Church, Jesus Christ. Respect is shown for the position, not the man occupying it.Head of the church, people bowing and kissing his hand, and all the pomp and pageantry... USURPER
He did not say anything truthful about the Catholic Church and he can only give his interpretation of scripture, which some of it was never taught untilHe is truthful about what the church ("the elect") teaches, and it can be shown by the alignment to scripture.
He tells his congregation lies about children of God. Children who are loving and faithful to their lord Jesus Christ. He will have to answer for the lies which he tells. He will have to answer for the harm which he does to his sheep by sending them out believing in his lies.No he gives his congregation the truth at the expense of you guys slandering his name...The PLUMB-LINE to truth? SCRIPTURE, he follows it.
He can't use scripture to prove any of what he has said because he doesn't even understand what the Catholic Church teaches.If you can't use scripture to prove he is lying you should not be calling a man of God a liar, you're treading on dangerous ground when you actually use the written word of God as your plumb-line to truth.
I didn't say I believed in the Roman Catholic doctrine of purgatory.
I was just saying that it doesn't seem to offer much in the way of a safety net like some people are implying.
That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer why the office of the priest requires one to be celibate. It should be on a case by case basis. In other words, if you want to marry, fine. If you don't, fine. But it shouldn't be, if you want to marry, fine, but you can't be a Priest.
Originally Posted by Stryder06 That's all well and good, but it doesn't answer why the office of the priest requires one to be celibate. It should be on a case by case basis. In other words, if you want to marry, fine. If you don't, fine. But it shouldn't be, if you want to marry, fine, but you can't be a Priest.
I'm not overly interested in what it was - 16th century battles are better left there. What matters now is what the RCC is teaching now.
Gotcha! Sorry for any confusion.
Sure, the devil would love for everyone to think they get a second chance.
Rapture....Repent now, while there is still time!Wait, are we talking about the rapture now?
Originally Posted by Sargent_Pepper
We know that Augustine would be vehemently opposing the vast amount of Roman Catholic teachings and practices because he already has in hiw works against Pelagius and the semi-pelagians, Gnostics, Montanists and other heretical groups.
Wait, are we talking about the rapture now?