What will happen, at the end, for those that do not belong to Christ?Okay, so purgatory isn't necessary for those who belong to Christ at the last moment. Why is it necessary for the others?
Upvote
0
What will happen, at the end, for those that do not belong to Christ?Okay, so purgatory isn't necessary for those who belong to Christ at the last moment. Why is it necessary for the others?
Nope, it's the same. I was there for about 18yrs, & I checked because it was important to me at the time.Hmmm. *wish I had a smiley with a pensive look
That is not RCC. Must be some other church.
This is not true. A married man can become a priest. We have several in the area. We had a married Baptist minister convert to Catholicism and he became a priest, last year.If I have the call to be a priest & I'm married, I'm FORCED out.
My free will in the matter has been cornered for profit.
It was the concern over loss of church property that is partly the motivation for that tradition, or 'rite'.
lulz you mean because he was ALREADY previously married right?This is not true. A married man can become a priest. We have several in the area. We had a married Baptist minister convert to Catholicism and he became a priest, last year.
Yes. Married men can become priest but a priest cannot marry.lulz you mean because he was ALREADY previously married right?
I won't comment on this one, as its not my place to say who or what is damningA sample of some of what MacArthur says about the Catholic Church.
"A false and damning religion"
who knows, this one sounds more like opinion."In the war on the truth, the most formidable relentless and deceptive enemy has been Roman Catholicism."
you can see he gets this from what he believes the true Church to be, and whether you want to admit it or not, protestants are viewed the same way"It is an apostate corrupt heretical false Christianity."
Probably gets these ideas from all the tradition and such involved with being a priest"It is a false system, it has a false priesthood, a false source of revelation..."
most people probably only do just venerate..but it is the encouragment of this practice that can very easily lead people astray"It engages in idolatry in the worship of saints and the veneration of angels."
well I have heard Catholics tell me that the Lord cannot refuse his mothers requests."It conducts a horrific exultation of Mary above Christ and even God."
I have heard this argument before, he is not teaching..he is explaining the result of your teachings (I'm not saying you guys do..but this is what he believes when you say you bring the Lords body into the wafer ect)"It conducts a twisted sacrament of the Mass by which Jesus is sacrificed again and again."
I'm still trying to figure this one out myself so..."It offers false forgiveness through the confessional."
You cannot deny that this was a practice in the Church. My dad even has a certificate of sorts in his bedroom dresser that states that someone PAID for a Mass on his deceased mothers behalf...this I find..disturbing.Selling indulgences for money, selling forgiveness for money."
I hope he made this distinction in regards to being a Priest or Monk ect."Forced celibacy,"
this is of course still..a debate that will rage on till the ends of time.The Pope has ursurped the headship of Christ over his Church."
What will happen, at the end, for those that do not belong to Christ?
Yes. Married men can become priest but a priest cannot marry.
I won't comment on this one, as its not my place to say who or what is damning
who knows, this one sounds more like opinion.
you can see he gets this from what he believes the true Church to be, and whether you want to admit it or not, protestants are viewed the same way
Probably gets these ideas from all the tradition and such involved with being a priest
most people probably only do just venerate..but it is the encouragment of this practice that can very easily lead people astray
well I have heard Catholics tell me that the Lord cannot refuse his mothers requests.
I have heard this argument before, he is not teaching..he is explaining the result of your teachings (I'm not saying you guys do..but this is what he believes when you say you bring the Lords body into the wafer ect)
I'm still trying to figure this one out myself so...
You cannot deny that this was a practice in the Church. My dad even has a certificate of sorts in his bedroom dresser that states that someone PAID for a Mass on his deceased mothers behalf...this I find..disturbing.
How come threads on Indulgences get closed and never reopen? This thread didn't even get one response before it was closed ehehe....*snip*
Since indulgences remit only temporal penalties, they cannot remit the eternal penalty of hell.
if it is in fact false it would be damning...Places that teach in opposition to scripture may well be damning"A false and damning religion"
well this is up for debate, i'll take the true church that actually uses scripture as it's authoratative plumb-line."In the war on the truth, the most formidable relentless and deceptive enemy has been Roman Catholicism."
Prove it isn't using scripture"It is an apostate corrupt heretical false Christianity."
well if it's teachings fail the plumbline? where does that position her?"It is a front for the kingdom of Satan. The true church of the lord Jesus Christ has always understood this." (Evidently he doesn't think that the Orthodox Church is part of the true Church either)
False priesthood, see Hebrews..."It is a false system, it has a false priesthood, a false source of revelation..."
straight up against scripture"It engages in idolatry in the worship of saints and the veneration of angels."
See the Psalter of Mary along with many other prayers that exalt her to a nearly deistic identity."It conducts a horrific exultation of Mary above Christ and even God."
same sacrifice continually...Semantics"It conducts a twisted sacrament of the Mass by which Jesus is sacrificed again and again."
"It offers false forgiveness through the confessional."
the thief on the cross proves that it's a non-essential"It calls for the uselessness of infant baptism..."
Prove this isn't true."Motivated by money it has invented purgatory. Purgatory is what makes the whole system work. Take out purgatory and it's a hard sell to be Catholic. People hang in there because of the deception of purgatory."
"Purgatory is the safety net, when you die you don't go to hell, you go there and get things sorted out, you finally get to heaven if you been a good Catholic."
Yep. See Johan Tetzel, commissioned by the Pope...when a coin in the coffer rings a soul from purgatory doth spring."Selling indulgences for money, selling forgiveness for money."
semantics"Forced celibacy,"
Head of the church, people bowing and kissing his hand, and all the pomp and pageantry... USURPER"The Pope has ursurped the headship of Christ over his Church."
He is truthful about what the church ("the elect") teaches, and it can be shown by the alignment to scripture.I'm not sure that he said a single item which was truthful. People may have a problem with some of the theology but at least be truthful about what the Church teaches.
There are hundreds or thousands of Calvinistic Baptists which listen to his sermons and he lies to each of them when he stands in the pulpit which only the truth should heard. His congregation deserves better than that.
No he gives his congregation the truth at the expense of you guys slandering his name...The PLUMB-LINE to truth? SCRIPTURE, he follows it.
If you can't use scripture to prove he is lying you should not be calling a man of God a liar, you're treading on dangerous ground when you actually use the written word of God as your plumb-line to truth.
The practice of indulgences has changed over time, depending on which way the whim blows.
They are not found in the very early church.
So, in that sense/clarification, it is forced celibacy.
I understand the reason about focusing on God or earth, but Paul also said, it's a gift, not something to be forced or restricted. Again, Peter was married, but again, Peter was not a RC priest either.
But he feels that it is his place.I won't comment on this one, as its not my place to say who or what is damning
He is standing in a pulpit of a Christian Church. He needs to keep unfounded opinions to himself and not claim them as truth to his sheep. A teacher will be judged more strictly than the sheep.who knows, this one sounds more like opinion.
By whom?you can see he gets this from what he believes the true Church to be, and whether you want to admit it or not, protestants are viewed the same way
Still a false statement showing that he is clueless about the traditions of the ancient Church.Probably gets these ideas from all the tradition and such involved with being a priest
In what way does admiring the Apostle Paul lead someone astray? Some, weak in faith, may go way too far but the Catholic and Orthodox Church warn people about this and teach them that only God is to be worshiped.most people probably only do just venerate..but it is the encouragment of this practice that can very easily lead people astray
Catholics telling you something and the Church teaching it is quite different.well I have heard Catholics tell me that the Lord cannot refuse his mothers requests.
Again, he is supposed to a representative of Jesus Christ. He is a teacher. He is standing in a pulpit telling his congregation a lie.I have heard this argument before, he is not teaching..he is explaining the result of your teachings (I'm not saying you guys do..but this is what he believes when you say you bring the Lords body into the wafer ect)
Confession? Confession has been a part of the ancient Church from its beginning. Granted it has evolved but Christ granted his representatives the authority to forgive sins.I'm still trying to figure this one out myself so...
Was a practice and is one are quite two separate things. The CC recognized this was occurring and that it was wrong to do so and put an end to its improper usage.You cannot deny that this was a practice in the Church.
I'm not sure exactly what this is but here is what Indulgences are not.My dad even has a certificate of sorts in his bedroom dresser that states that someone PAID for a Mass on his deceased mothers behalf...this I find..disturbing.
Why? In neither case is celibacy forced. Each freely choose celibacy.I hope he made this distinction in regards to being a Priest or Monk ect.
Again, Why? The Pope has not usurped anything. Jesus is the head of his Church. Jesus is in heaven. The Pope is a representative of Jesus on earth.this is of course still..a debate that will rage on till the ends of time.
No, no priest has been forced to be celibate. Each has made the free will choice to be celibate.So, in that sense/clarification, it is forced celibacy.
Did you get that out of my question? You really need to read it again and answer the question.So purgatory is not for Christians, but for the unsaved?
It is true that Catholic priests in the West may not be married, but no one is obliged to become a priest. Marriage is not forbidden to them as human beings, but as priests. A Catholic man is free to choose the celibate priesthood, the married life, or even the single life (which also is celibate). Celibacy is forced on no one.
Ahh.. I found a thread on thatNo, no priest has been forced to be celibate. Each has made the free will choice to be celibate.
It is true that Catholic priests in the West may not be married, but no one is obliged to become a priest. Marriage is not forbidden to them as human beings, but as priests. A Catholic man is free to choose the celibate priesthood, the married life, or even the single life (which also is celibate). Celibacy is forced on no one.