Not to be combative, but there is a bit of a difference between a statue in front of a church and, as I have seen in old Catholic churches, at least a dozen side altars where mass was once performed statues of saints on them and no Jesus at all.
Yes. There is.
I lived in Ely, England for three years. Ely has this beautiful cathedral, dating from 1075. Once, the interior was completely covered with frescoed icons. There has been some archeology done to restore what they can.
There is a medieval chapel, dedicated to Our Lady, that at one time, was stunningly beautiful because of the glass work that soared up the buttressed walls.
Oliver Cromwell, a well-known Puritan and once Lord Protector of England, was once the rector of Ely Cathedral. During his "fight" to restore "right thinking" after centuries of "popery", he destroyed the windows of the Lady Chapel and covered over the frescoes. He also beheaded all the statuary. The Puritans believed these things were in complete violation of the 2nd Commandment. Cromwell believed the cathedral to be offensive even in it's architecture; he stabled his cavalry's horses there.
Yet, down the road from Ely, and elsewhere in England, commemorating his political career as "Lord Protector", are statues of Oliver Cromwell...there are also paintings galore. I sense a bit of a disconnect between theology and praxis in this; a lack of consistency in one's beliefs.
If you are an iconoclast, why have these things???
I'm just saying.