Trashionista
Well-Known Member
- Jun 10, 2007
- 6,222
- 554
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- CA-Liberals
That's what I am saying:
SHALLOW MEN = 95% looks is the most important
SHALLOW WOMEN (and yes there are some out there) = 95% money
that is all I am saying. Both are shallow and wrong but there is a distinct difference between the two.
Guys like that will date a young girl til her looks fade, then he will drop her for a new model. As long as the money is flowing there is always another "beauty" to take her place.
Gals (who are fine) can pick up rich men (any age). When the money runs out, they can find another rich guy...til their looks fade away.
Seems like a little bit of a stretch to suggest all women who are shallow go for cash, whereas shallow men will go only for looks. Joan Collins has been married time and time again to good-looking, much younger men. It's still shallow - I don't believe anyone finds a 'soul mate' 7 or 8 times in their lifetime - even if she's going for men who probably have less cash than she does.
Go Joan.
Upvote
0