nephilimiyr
I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
- Jan 21, 2003
- 23,432
- 1,799
- 60
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
And that all goes for you too since you decided to give Tamara a big thumbs up for that post of hers.
There's alot of talk about this in the news, locally and nationally.
Amen, although from what I have read I am sure that this will fall on deaf ears. Shame that anything connected or thought to be connected to WOF gets attacked by only a certain few. I question which board they should really be posting as ot doesnt seem to fit here very much.then you don't understand the concept behind positive confession.
positive confession is getting my thinking to agree with God's thinking on the matter....in other words to say the same thing that He says about something.
In order to do that we first have to know what God says, in order to come into agreement with Him.
but in your scenario you would have the opposite happening---God comming into agreement with what WE said. and that's not how it works.
there are two things that you need to know about the above newpaper articles quoted here. (for easy reference, posts 76 and 77, page 8)
first, The Oregonian is a liberal newspaper, published in a liberal state.
secondly, any time that members of this forum read about 'hyper faith religion' they will automatically associate it with WOF. they will ignore the fact that the article is actually talking about a named group in which the words 'Word of Faith" do not appear, and that the group spoken of has all the recognized signs of a local cult.
and that's how this thread got to talking about WOF in relation to the article.
The roundtable discussion which also included Assemblies of God leaders L. Alton Garrison, assistant general superintendent, and Douglas E. Clay, general treasurer comes after a number of faith healing cases involving parents whose sick children died of easily treatable conditions.
Yep, and in my hometown here there was a recent case that did make national headlines and network news programes where this 12 years old girl died from a diabetes attack because her parents refuse to take the sick girl to the doctor. I've talked about this case here before. My pastor felt sorry for them because the whole community demonized them, as can be expected, and had invited them to services.The article cited in the opening post seems to have as it's main focus , these extreme cult like groups that have members dying because they are not seeking medical care when they are not healed.
From the article...
Yep, and in my hometown here there was a recent case that did make national headlines and network news programes where this 12 years old girl died from a diabetes attack because her parents refuse to take the sick girl to the doctor.
I wonder if someone from WoF, could answer a question for me.
As you (WoF) believe it is God's will to heal you, or actually that God has already healed you/provided for your healing, what is keeping so many of you from experiencing that healing?
IOW, when someone is not healed, why not?
Thanks in advance,
Simon
I wonder if someone from WoF, could answer a question for me.
As you (WoF) believe it is God's will to heal you, or actually that God has already healed you/provided for your healing, what is keeping so many of you from experiencing that healing?
IOW, when someone is not healed, why not?
I used to enjoy talking about WoF-related issues, but around here I've mostly abandoned the attempt. It's just too surreal. I'm one of the ones who "doesn't understand" and "misrepresents" WoF. I spent almost 10 years in an IAOGI church that taught WoF. Attended 2-3 services per week. Visited about three other WoF-teaching churches (a CoG, one or two Christian Assemblies/CCNA, and one of uncertain affiliation). Participated in Bible studies led by WoF church members, and often using Kenneth Hagin books as study aids, several times per month. Devoured books and tapes by Kenneth Hagins Sr. and Jr., and read quite a few by Osborne, Osteen, Capps, Hayes, Copeland, and others. As part of the "helps" ministry at the church, I consumed books and tapes by Bob Lemon, Bob (?) Yandian, and Mark Barclay.
Then I come here and learn what I read, heard, and experienced was not "real" WoF. :o
What never ceases to amaze me is how two people can sit and listen to the same things but hear very different things.
.....
How does one explain that? When I'm sitting, quite literally, 4 feet away from the same person and they come to such a radically different conclusion than I, is it the teaching that is flawed, or is it the individual's receiving of that teaching?
Rom 14:1 Him that is weak in the faith receive ye, but not to doubtful disputations.
Rom 14:2 For one believeth that he may eat all things: another, who is weak, eateth herbs.
Rom 14:3 Let not him that eateth despise him that eateth not; and let not him which eateth not judge him that eateth: for God hath received him.
Rom 14:4 Who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth. Yea, he shall be holden up: for God is able to make him stand.
I have told this story several times. When I was at the Mennonite church they had a rule against wearing ties because they consider it worldly and not humble. Then I went to the Assembly of God church and joined the choir. They had a rule I had to wear a tie. They said it was about humbling myself to submit to leadership and also about honoring God by giving my best.
Two opposite rules. Different virtues being emphasized. Both biblical. I could have focused on the negative and seen a contradiction. Instead I saw two sincere churches both trying to serve God in different ways.
Then there is the time my daughter when she was young was told by some people at the church we visited that we would go to hell for having a television. She told me she was glad we didn't go to that church because God was much more strict with them. My daughter said that God allows us to have a television and is so strict with that church that they are not allowed to have t.v.'s or they go to hell. I decided my daughter actually had good theology at a young age.
Sometimes there are actual disagreements. But most of the time it is just like my tie wearing example. Churches emphasizing different virtues or doctrines.
Sometimes it is like the television example. Churches put burdens upon themselves that we don't have to carry.
I am not word of faith. But I choose to look at them as emphasizing true christian virtues. I can find good in every denomination. If we take the time to ask and realy listen we will find most people in churches are trying to follow God the best way they know how.
Sometimes we are like someone argueing with the Mennonite church I went to and accusing them of leagalism and all they hear us saying is that we are argueing for pride and worldlyness.
Yes, Chriist paid for all our sins and freed us from the law and yes pride can be a really bad thing, pride comes inmmany forms and shapes as evidenced on this board.Whenever legalism of faith doctrines replaces grace because we are in different stages of life with different demands. It is the whole difference between legalism and true Christianity. Christ's blood counts as payment for all our sins, and His fulfillment of the law counts as all the merit we need. I remember a quote by Yancey, Jesus reserved his hardest words for the hidden sins of hypocrisy, pride, greed and legalism.