Permisability of Interest?

OttomanScribe

Junior Member
Mar 30, 2010
79
0
✟7,689.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
From my own historical knowledge it was my understanding that interest used to be prohibited amongst Christian groups. I see aspects of this prohibition in the NT itself. Yet on the sidebar of this forum I see an add (one of many) for the Commonwealth bank.

Am I correct in thinking that there is a change in stance here? What is its justification?

I ask this in respectful confusion. My own religion prohibits the paying or receiving of interest, both being seen as inherently exploitative.

Thanks in advance,

peace.
 

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟44,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus was not against collecting interest in both of the following parables Jesus tells a story of two servants that were rebuked for not doing anything with the money given them, not even putting it in a bank to collect interest.

Mt 25:
26"His master replied, 'You wicked, lazy servant! So you knew that I harvest where I have not sown and gather where I have not scattered seed? 27Well then, you should have put my money on deposit with the bankers, so that when I returned I would have received it back with interest.
28" 'Take the talent from him and give it to the one who has the ten talents.

Luke 19:

22"His master replied, 'I will judge you by your own words, you wicked servant! You knew, did you, that I am a hard man, taking out what I did not put in, and reaping what I did not sow? 23Why then didn't you put my money on deposit, so that when I came back, I could have collected it with interest?' 24"Then he said to those standing by, 'Take his mina away from him and give it to the one who has ten minas.'
 
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟44,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The verse you speak of is in Romans 13:

8Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for he who loves his fellowman has fulfilled the law. 9The commandments, "Do not commit adultery," "Do not murder," "Do not steal," "Do not covet,"[a] and whatever other commandment there may be, are summed up in this one rule: "Love your neighbor as yourself."[b] 10Love does no harm to its neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law.

Paul speaks of a sin debt. Jesus referrs to sin as a debt in a couple different parables one can be found in
Mt 18:
21Then Peter came to Jesus and asked, "Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?"

22Jesus answered, "I tell you, not seven times, but seventy-seven times.[f]
23"Therefore, the kingdom of heaven is like a king who wanted to settle accounts with his servants. 24As he began the settlement, a man who owed him ten thousand talents[g] was brought to him. 25Since he was not able to pay, the master ordered that he and his wife and his children and all that he had be sold to repay the debt.
26"The servant fell on his knees before him. 'Be patient with me,' he begged, 'and I will pay back everything.' 27The servant's master took pity on him, canceled the debt and let him go.
28"But when that servant went out, he found one of his fellow servants who owed him a hundred denarii.[h] He grabbed him and began to choke him. 'Pay back what you owe me!' he demanded.
29"His fellow servant fell to his knees and begged him, 'Be patient with me, and I will pay you back.'
30"But he refused. Instead, he went off and had the man thrown into prison until he could pay the debt. 31When the other servants saw what had happened, they were greatly distressed and went and told their master everything that had happened.
32"Then the master called the servant in. 'You wicked servant,' he said, 'I canceled all that debt of yours because you begged me to. 33Shouldn't you have had mercy on your fellow servant just as I had on you?' 34In anger his master turned him over to the jailers to be tortured, until he should pay back all he owed. 35"This is how my heavenly Father will treat each of you unless you forgive your brother from your heart."
 
Upvote 0

GreenMunchkin

Likes things. And stuff. But mostly things.
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2007
20,382
7,476
45
United Kingdom of wo0t
✟99,941.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From my own historical knowledge it was my understanding that interest used to be prohibited amongst Christian groups. I see aspects of this prohibition in the NT itself. Yet on the sidebar of this forum I see an add (one of many) for the Commonwealth bank.

Am I correct in thinking that there is a change in stance here? What is its justification?

I ask this in respectful confusion. My own religion prohibits the paying or receiving of interest, both being seen as inherently exploitative.

Thanks in advance,

peace.
Really? I'm in London, and last Wednesday I happened to see a bank called "The Islamic Bank of Britain" (which, frankly, frightens the living daylights out of me) and it advertises its "profit rates" in the window.

In any event, the Bible prohibits the charging of interest, specifically between friends and family (including fellow Christians).The Bible doesn't necessarily prohibit earning interest so much as it condemns greed. Earning interest and greed aren't synonymous - it all depends on what you do with the interest you've earned.

The larger picture is we are commanded to render unto Caesar what is Caesar's and to submit to secular authorities providing they don't come between us and the Lord... that applies to banking, also.
 
Upvote 0

OttomanScribe

Junior Member
Mar 30, 2010
79
0
✟7,689.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Really? I'm in London, and last Wednesday I happened to see a bank called "The Islamic Bank of Britain" (which, frankly, frightens the living daylights out of me) and it advertises its "profit rates" in the window.

Why does this scare you? Such Muslim banks do not charge interest on loans, essentially they buy an item and then allow an individual to buy the item (usually property) from them in instalments. This is different from other banks in that it is they who own the investment, and therefore they who fail if it fails. Other banks, because they are lending money, allow for speculation and are essentially making money purely because they themselves have it.

I personally find this still quite shady, and while it may be halal (permissible) I don't see it as being tayyib (beneficial).

Though again I ask why it frightens you? The Islamic system of banking, had it had been in place in countries like America, would have stopped the widespread artificial of housing prices beyond any reasonable value, and therefore stopped the last economic collapse.

One could also argue that without the interest made permissible in Britain and Holland, colonialism and the huge amount of exploitation and suffering that came with it, could never have occurred. But I digress.


In any event, the Bible prohibits the charging of interest, specifically between friends and family (including fellow Christians).The Bible doesn't necessarily prohibit earning interest so much as it condemns greed. Earning interest and greed aren't synonymous - it all depends on what you do with the interest you've earned.

So as long as it is charging people you don't no, or infidels, it is permissible? Why is your understanding different to the above? Did the early church practice money lending?

In terms of secular authorities, banking in its current form stemmed from Christian countries, before secularism was invented. I always wonder what exactly in this world is not God's and therefore should not be rendered unto Him. Caesar, in reality, owns nothing. All is God's, surely?
 
Upvote 0

GreenMunchkin

Likes things. And stuff. But mostly things.
Site Supporter
Jan 21, 2007
20,382
7,476
45
United Kingdom of wo0t
✟99,941.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Though again I ask why it frightens you?
Because, frankly, Islam is too dangerous a religion to have a bank in a country it is increasingly and insidiously starting to oppress. National banks I understand. Religious banks (ones which fail to adhere to the tenets of its faith, no less) are alarming, because it's the thin end of a very scary wedge.
So as long as it is charging people you don't no, or infidels, it is permissible? Why is your understanding different to the above?
"Infidels" is all yours, bud. It's permissible, yes. And, again, the Bible condemns greed. In fact, Jesus told a parable about financial greed, and how it related to forgiveness and salvation.
Did the early church practice money lending?
Couldn't tell you. Can't see that it would make any difference, anyhow. I'm well aware that things done in the name of God are often the very opposite of what He would want.
In terms of secular authorities, banking in its current form stemmed from Christian countries, before secularism was invented. I always wonder what exactly in this world is not God's and therefore should not be rendered unto Him. Caesar, in reality, owns nothing. All is God's, surely?
God is sovereign, but He appointed Adam the caretaker of this earth. God is ultimately sovereign, which is why He is our ultimate Authority. He trumps all else. But while we are on this planet, there are authorities we submit to.
 
Upvote 0

OttomanScribe

Junior Member
Mar 30, 2010
79
0
✟7,689.00
Faith
Muslim
Marital Status
Married
Because, frankly, Islam is too dangerous a religion to have a bank in a country it is increasingly and insidiously starting to oppress. National banks I understand. Religious banks (ones which fail to adhere to the tenets of its faith, no less) are alarming, because it's the thin end of a very scary wedge.

So you are against Christian values in public institutions? What makes Islam dangerous?

"Infidels" is all yours, bud. It's permissible, yes. And, again, the Bible condemns greed. In fact, Jesus told a parable about financial greed, and how it related to forgiveness and salvation.

So there is a difference between how one should treat those close to you, and those who aren't Christian? So it is not okay to be harmful to Christians and family, but non-Christians and people you don't know are essentially fair game?

Couldn't tell you. Can't see that it would make any difference, anyhow. I'm well aware that things done in the name of God are often the very opposite of what He would want.

Do Christians not believe that the early church, through proximity to Christ, would have held the more correct practices?

God is sovereign, but He appointed Adam the caretaker of this earth. God is ultimately sovereign, which is why He is our ultimate Authority. He trumps all else. But while we are on this planet, there are authorities we submit to.

Indeed, but if these authorities are Christian, should they not submit to God?
 
Upvote 0