So, a Gay Person is in Grave Peril

Status
Not open for further replies.

CaptainNemo1138

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2008
703
45
30
✟1,140.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Oh come on seriously?

How do you know their orientation.. is there a scarlet F on their head or something?


Let's just say you know. I know, this topic is really out their, but I'm genuinely curious as to what responses it will receive. Hopefully most will understand that all human life is fundamentally equally important.
 
Upvote 0

Wayte

Oh, you know. Some guy.
Jan 31, 2010
2,306
92
33
Silverdale, WA
✟18,059.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Oh come on seriously?

How do you know their orientation.. is there a scarlet F on their head or something?
Just run with it. This is bound to get some insane individual to give a hilariously bigotted answer.
 
Upvote 0

daniel777

Well-Known Member
Feb 13, 2007
4,050
154
America
✟12,839.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
i'm with tardis and death-star boy on all but everything. if i ever find myself in such a situation, the most ethical thing to do would would of course be to grab a shovel, or any sort of blunt object really, and beat the gay person over the cliff... after which i fly away on my broomstick happily and full of glee, feasting on the leftover human child i had for breakfast.
 
Upvote 0

Supernaut

What did they aim for when they missed your heart?
Jun 12, 2009
3,455
282
Sacramento, CA
✟12,439.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Let's say that they're hanging on for dear life on a cliff. You are the only person who will reach them in time to save their life. Would you save them as quickly as a straight person? Would you save them at all?

Save them as I would anyone....including my enemy. As payback...they can help me pick out some new clothes....I need help!!!
 
Upvote 0

lawtonfogle

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.
Apr 20, 2005
11,585
350
35
✟13,892.00
Faith
Christian
Let's say that they're hanging on for dear life on a cliff. You are the only person who will reach them in time to save their life. Would you save them as quickly as a straight person? Would you save them at all?

Yes, yes.
 
Upvote 0

Verv

Senior Veteran
Apr 17, 2005
7,244
624
서울
✟31,762.00
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Let's say that they're hanging on for dear life on a cliff. You are the only person who will reach them in time to save their life. Would you save them as quickly as a straight person? Would you save them at all?

Hahaha, I am curious what part of Christian doctrine would even allow us to hesitate in such a situation?

It makes no sense that the answer would not be 'of course I would save them immediately.'
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟58,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Let's say that they're hanging on for dear life on a cliff. You are the only person who will reach them in time to save their life. Would you save them as quickly as a straight person? Would you save them at all?

Based on studies I've read, I would hypothesize that while most people would say no, in actuality they would take significantly longer to save a gay person than a straight one. This is especially true among religious people.

Diffusion of responsibility is a psychological theory that postulates that you are less likely to save someone from harm if there are other people who could possibly save them. The more people, the less likely.

The classic study that is set up is that a group of people are set up in seperate rooms, but communicate over intercoms. One person in the group (an associate) starts complaining of chest pains, and then for all intents and purposes has a heart attack. If each listener knows that there are 4 other people listening in, it will take them longer to respond with help than if there was only 1. It takes even longer if they each know that there are 8.

However, other studies have shown that if the victim has identified themselves as being part of an ingroup, reaction time decreases substantially, and the opposite if the victim has identified themselves as a part of an outgroup. Also, reaction time increases significantly from the norm if the victim is a member of an outgroup for which the rescuer has formed an affluent prejudice against (ie, they don't like them).

Obviously, what's important is that it takes a single person longer to come to the rescue of someone of an outgroup of which the rescuer has a prejudice against, than a neutral person.

There happens to be a very significant correlation between religiosity, and affluent negative prejudice toward homosexuals.

The hypothesis writes itself.
 
Upvote 0

Verv

Senior Veteran
Apr 17, 2005
7,244
624
서울
✟31,762.00
Country
Korea, Republic Of
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Based on studies I've read, I would hypothesize that while most people would say no, in actuality they would take significantly longer to save a gay person than a straight one. This is especially true among religious people.

Diffusion of responsibility is a psychological theory that postulates that you are less likely to save someone from harm if there are other people who could possibly save them. The more people, the less likely.

The classic study that is set up is that a group of people are set up in seperate rooms, but communicate over intercoms. One person in the group (an associate) starts complaining of chest pains, and then for all intents and purposes has a heart attack. If each listener knows that there are 4 other people listening in, it will take them longer to respond with help than if there was only 1. It takes even longer if they each know that there are 8.

However, other studies have shown that if the victim has identified themselves as being part of an ingroup, reaction time decreases substantially, and the opposite if the victim has identified themselves as a part of an outgroup. Also, reaction time increases significantly from the norm if the victim is a member of an outgroup for which the rescuer has formed an affluent prejudice against (ie, they don't like them).

Obviously, what's important is that it takes a single person longer to come to the rescue of someone of an outgroup of which the rescuer has a prejudice against, than a neutral person.

There happens to be a very significant correlation between religiosity, and affluent negative prejudice toward homosexuals.

The hypothesis writes itself.

One major difference here:

We have someone on a cliff about to die, or it is known for a fact that they are in grave peril.

In the other one it is the issue of someone who is having chest pains.

Perhaps it is something like anxiety that is causing it? Who knows.

Furthermore, could we not also postulate that if a Christian fundamentalist was having chest pains and surrounded by homosexuals, they would also be slower to help them?

Or does some how, some way, being gay make them more inclined to defy the principles you have outlined here?

Most swords cut both ways, good sir.

Second: isn't it also true that most atheists are huge discriminators against homosexuals?

Historically, more legalized discrimination against gays has occurred in the 20th century by atheists than by Christians.

That is: Vietnam, China, North Korea, Laos, Cuba, the former USSR, etc.

The first societies to be this accepting of homosexuals in modern times are the ones of Christian background.

I guess we could have the debate:

Who would be more likely to help the gay?

A Christian from France or an atheist from China.
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
23,818
20,224
Flatland
✟866,112.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
It is a certain instinctive attitude which feels the things on which all men agree to be unspeakably important, and all the things in which they differ (such as mere brains) to be almost unspeakably unimportant. The nearest approach to it in our ordinary life would be the promptitude with which we should consider mere humanity in any circumstances of shock or death. We should say, after a somewhat disturbing discovery, “There is a dead man under the sofa.” We should not be likely to say, “There is a dead man of considerable personal refinement under the sofa” . . . . Nobody would say, “There are the remains of a clear thinker in your back garden.” Nobody would say, “Unless you hurry up and stop him, a man with a very fine ear for music will have jumped off that cliff”.

Chesterton, Heretics :)
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟58,445.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
One major difference here:

We have someone on a cliff about to die, or it is known for a fact that they are in grave peril.

In the other one it is the issue of someone who is having chest pains.

Perhaps it is something like anxiety that is causing it? Who knows.

Yeah, but: Given the evidence, I know how I would bet, and I would likely bet a fair amount. Knowing that someone is in trouble, rather than simply suspecting doesn't actually alter the effect itself. It may make them react sooner if they knew said person was in trouble, but not faster than it would take to get to a straight man.

Furthermore, could we not also postulate that if a Christian fundamentalist was having chest pains and surrounded by homosexuals, they would also be slower to help them?

Assuming said gay man was not also a Christian Fundamentalist? Yes, most likely. I am reasonably sure negative prejudices go the other way too.

Or does some how, some way, being gay make them more inclined to defy the principles you have outlined here?

No.

Most swords cut both ways, good sir.

Maybe, but gays have no biblical obligation to love everyone, and I haven't met many who pretend to do so.

Second: isn't it also true that most atheists are huge discriminators against homosexuals?

Not in anything I read.

Historically, more legalized discrimination against gays has occurred in the 20th century by atheists than by Christians.

That is: Vietnam, China, North Korea, Laos, Cuba, the former USSR, etc.

Historically, maybe. It doesn't really matter now, does it? I read nothing in the question that suggests that the incident happens in the 1920's. Here and now there is a staggering correlation between negative affective prejudice against homosexuals and religiosity.

The first societies to be this accepting of homosexuals in modern times are the ones of Christian background.

Actually, the ones with the most secular background. Finland, Sweden, Norway, Canada, U.K....all far more secular than the United States (the most Christian nation among the most advanced countries), and far more accepting. In the United States it also tends to be the secularists, not the Christians.

I guess we could have the debate:

Who would be more likely to help the gay?

A Christian from France or an atheist from China.

Actually, it seems that about 30% of Chinese disapprove of homosexuality, compared to about 60% of Americans. Seeing as our Frenchman is Christian, I'd say its about a draw.

In the United States do you think it would be the atheist, or the Christian?
 
Upvote 0

IreneAdler

more binah in her finger than in your whole body
Oct 12, 2009
5,549
391
✟22,392.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Let's say that they're hanging on for dear life on a cliff. You are the only person who will reach them in time to save their life. Would you save them as quickly as a straight person? Would you save them at all?
sure. I'm not sure I'd take time to find out first anyway - lol. Not to mention, life is more important than religious differences or disagreement of practices.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

wanderingone

I'm not lost I'm just wandering
Jul 6, 2005
11,090
932
57
New York
✟30,779.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Save them as I would anyone....including my enemy. As payback...they can help me pick out some new clothes....I need help!!!

You've obviously never met my cousin and his husband... the only way they can help you pick out clothes is if you're inclined towards the Grizzly Adams look (wait... do people still know who Grizzly Adams is?) But please help them if they're hanging off a cliff anyway.. they're pretty decent people and while they aren't into clothing they are foodies who can lead you to the best food and wine around.
 
Upvote 0

IreneAdler

more binah in her finger than in your whole body
Oct 12, 2009
5,549
391
✟22,392.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
In Relationship
hehehe. I knew the nicest gay man. He was this incredibly talented artist and I had only met him on the phone and internet until I went to his studio. Grizzly Adams is right. So much for presuming someone's appearance or talents by their sexual identity.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
B

BigBadWlf

Guest
I suspect more than a few fundamentalists would hesitate before saving such a person…and a significant number would “help” gravity. And then there are a few who would grab hold of the person but demand they say that their sexual orientation has been changed before they save them and then add another ex-gay individual to that ever growing number of happy heterosexuals living among us
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.