Um ... excuse me.
I said Nero persecuted the Christians in AD58 for turning the world upside down.
No, you didn´t. Call me a literalist, but you said (quote) "You do know that the earth reversed its magnetic field in AD 58, causing the poles to switch?"
You get that from this verse about the world turning upside down.
The part about the magnetic poles reversing is in respect to how it was done.
In other words, I'm agreeing with science here.
You agree... with what? Where does "science" ever said something about a reversal of the magnetic field in 58AD or any other upturnings of the world? Nowhere!
HOWEVER, if as you say, a magnetic reversal doesn't work that way --- no problem.
(Remember, I agree with 95% of science.)
You don´t agree with anything... you make stuff up and then you make more stuff up to support the first... and when your hand is blown, you withdraw and tell everyone and everything to "take a hike".
So if the earth's reversal in AD58 wasn't because of science, I have no problem with that.
Do you?
"because of science"? Now what is that to mean? Another of your non-sensical word-twisters.
WHAT THE HECK HAPPENED IN 58AD? In you over-literal stance, "turning the world upside down"
must refer to the planet Earth... no other interpretation possible. And so you start to make things up. Yet a magnetical reversal is out of question... whether "because of science" or whatever you want the cause to be. A magnetical reversal would simply have been ignored. It would not have been noticed. The people of that time
did not have the means to notice it. You do not have the means to notice it now.
So what was it, if it wasn´t a magnetic reversal? A physical one? That would have been noticable... but no one noticed that either. No change in the turning of the sun, or the directions.
So what happened? Could that verse not be, gasp, non-literal, and refer to an upheaving of society? The Christians definitely did that, and were "persecuted" for that.