intricatic
...a dinosaur... or something...
Selfishness is a value judgment. It has no place in a discussion about a supposedly objective criteria. Value judgments also rely on how you define the concepts you are using.Correlation does not imply causation, but if we look at people with children at home and people without children at home, the couples with children at home are more likely to give to charity.
Now there could be many causes for this. Like maybe if people with children at home have more income and can give more to charity? Not likely. There are others that might be likely.
There are a lot of things to look at, and soft sciences aren't very easy to isolate cause and effect.
But you even look at the reasons most people say they are childless, including all of the ones presented in this thread. And they are all selfish reasons.
I want more time for my hobbies is a selfish reason.
I don't think I would be a good parent (which is I don't want to take time to be a good parent, and won't choose to) is selfish.
I don't have enough money is selfish.
It would disturb my life is selfish.
Everything points to those who choose to not have children as being selfish, excluding the few who do so so that they can focus on serving others.
JM
As above, if you define selfishness to mean the things you describe, it would be selfish not to want expanded government micromanagement of your finances. It would be disruptive of your life and infringe your freedom to do with your money as you wish, and therefore would be selfish on your part. But under the value judgment of that assessment, the other external possibilities are neglected and motivations are defined as strictly one-dimensional, rendering them meaningless and outside the realm of reality. The reason for this is that the idea of selfishness implies a negative motivation - the motivation to deprive other people of something, or to not give something that you would prefer to use on your own indulgence. This context is not rational as a general indicator for why people do things and misses many fine distinctions that exist within each respective class of circumstance.
Upvote
0