Swine flu, Internment camps, Military involvement, Oh my!

Higher superego strength and lower suspiciousness are two things research has found to change in the human personality who have the brain parasite. How does this characteristic changes become usefully when the entire country has them?

Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O: Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004, 363:1965-1975.

Toxoplasmosis. [Lancet. 2004] - PubMed Result

The last swine flu vaccination campaign that took place in 1976 led to thousands of lawsuits. Damage claims totaled $1.3 billion. The vaccine claimed 25 lives and hundreds of previously healthy young adults were crippled from Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The swine flu itself claimed ONE life.

This time around, the U.S. government has taken steps to ensure this will not happen again. The financial liability, I mean.

Vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone,

visionary said:

http://patriotportal.yolasite.com/resources/GUIDELINES FOR VITAMIN AND MINERAL FOOD SUPPLEMENTS.pdf

http://patriotportal.yolasite.com/resources/who_fao_expert_report.pdf

USGS research on a brain parasite Toxoplasma gondii that can alter human personality
http://patriotportal.yolasite.com/resources/Lafferty06toxoPRSLB.pdf

This may be your vaccination

Click to expand...

From the toxoplasmosis paper:

"Since this study is correlative, it is impossible to
confirm causation (e.g. the analysis cannot reject the
alternative interpretation that aggregate personality or
cultural dimension alters risk of exposure), or to exclude
the possibility of spurious results (i.e. non-causal correlations
between aggregate personality and aspects of
climate and culture that influence T. gondii transmission).
In addition, the results only explain a fraction of the
variation in two of the four cultural dimensions, suggesting
that if T. gondii does influence human culture, it is only one
among many factors."

Mass release among a population would not necessarily result in mass subjugation.

Again, if this is conspiracy is for real, then they're utterly incompetent. I've played video games that have better conspiracy plots than this.

visionary said:

The last swine flu vaccination campaign that took place in 1976 led to thousands of lawsuits. Damage claims totaled $1.3 billion. The vaccine claimed 25 lives and hundreds of previously healthy young adults were crippled from Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The swine flu itself claimed ONE life.

This time around, the U.S. government has taken steps to ensure this will not happen again. The financial liability, I mean.

Vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone,

Click to expand...

In all the time I have lived in my neighborhood there has not been a single fire or break in and there has only been one natural disaster many years ago. Does this mean I should drop my home owner's insurance because it is a waste of money?

These steps are being taken IN CASE H1N1 mutates into a deadly strain. It is already very good at spreading in high density population centers.

Do me a favor and take alllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll the people who have been given vaccines in the past 10 years who have had reactions to them, not compare them to all the people who didn't. You should now understand that it is FAR more dangerous to ride in a car, walk down the road or even breath.

Also check your numbers, I know for a fact that there have been way more than one death thus far.

visionary said:

The last swine flu vaccination campaign that took place in 1976 led to thousands of lawsuits. Damage claims totaled $1.3 billion. The vaccine claimed 25 lives and hundreds of previously healthy young adults were crippled from Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The swine flu itself claimed ONE life.

Click to expand...

And as before - how many people were immunised? No point saying 25 people killed without putting it in context, that's just bad practice.

For all you know, the swine flu only killed one person because the vaccination program worked.

This time around, the U.S. government has taken steps to ensure this will not happen again. The financial liability, I mean.

Vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone,

Click to expand...

That, and I suspect they'll be trying to avoid Guillain-Barré - which arises as a result of the vaccine generation process - seeing as this was 30 years ago, there must surely be a better method now.

Given how pointlessly litiginous America is, I can't say I blame the people put under extreme pressure and time constraints to develop a new vaccine for wanting their backs covered.

There are only a few plausable reasons to want to inject the world population. One is to imbed a tracking device, monitoring device or some other implant along the same lines for similar reasons. Another reason would be to decrease the amount of human population altogether. A third reason is to implant a control feature, which can be activated to respond a certain way, when given the signal. A fourth reason is just plain money making project/ experiement to see how compliant the world is under its proproganda.

A fifth reason would be to vaccinate them against a possibly deadly disease. Did you also protest against universal immunization against smallpox decades ago that basically wiped out an incredibly deadly disease?

Also - almost every state and nation have laws that protect first aid providers that are qualified and competent against anything that could go wrong during the attempt to provide first aid. Is this also clearly an attempt to take over the nation via evils of first aid hypnosis?

Drekkan85 said:

A fifth reason would be to vaccinate them against a possibly deadly disease. Did you also protest against universal immunization against smallpox decades ago that basically wiped out an incredibly deadly disease?

Also - almost every state and nation have laws that protect first aid providers that are qualified and competent against anything that could go wrong during the attempt to provide first aid. Is this also clearly an attempt to take over the nation via evils of first aid hypnosis?

Click to expand...

When they give you mouth-to-mouth, they're actually exhaling mind-control nanomachines into your lungs.

visionary said:

The last swine flu vaccination campaign that took place in 1976 led to thousands of lawsuits. Damage claims totaled $1.3 billion. The vaccine claimed 25 lives and hundreds of previously healthy young adults were crippled from Guillain-Barré Syndrome. The swine flu itself claimed ONE life.

This time around, the U.S. government has taken steps to ensure this will not happen again. The financial liability, I mean.

Vaccine makers and federal officials have been rendered immune from lawsuits. Should anything go wrong with this current vaccine they will not have to pay a single cent to anyone,

Click to expand...

In New Zealand so far in the last four months there has been 14 deaths caused by swine flu

Yes, the vaccines are untested. They are starting the testing of them now.

And, the manufacturers are given immunity, or they wouldn't be willing to make them at all. The profit margin on vaccines is tiny. Even one big-ticket lawsuit would wipe out the profits. You want vaccines? You need to give the manufacturers immunity. That's why there is a government trust fund that compensates people who have bad reactions to vaccines.

HisdaughterJen said:

They have admitted that these vaccines are untested and they have admitted that they've given the vaccine makers legal immunity when the vaccine kills or injures somebody.

Doesn't that raise ONE GREAT BIG RED FLAG as to whether they are being benevolent or malevolent?

Click to expand...

Par for the course in a litigous society.

HisdaughterJen said:

Who else is being given legal immunity as it relates to the swine flu and it's vaccines?

Click to expand...

Who else needs it?

HisdaughterJen said:

Well, if someone in my family is killed or injured as a result of a vaccine, I'd be going after the doctor who gave the shot as well as the WHO and the government who made it mandatory.

Click to expand...

If someone in my family was killed as a result of an unimmunised person contracting swine flu and passing it on to them, I'd be going after them for damages at minimum

Tenebrae said:

If someone in my family was killed as a result of an unimmunised person contracting swine flu and passing it on to them, I'd be going after them for damages at minimum

Click to expand...

Hopefully it won't come to that because they'll be immunized.

HisdaughterJen said:

You can't sue someone for giving you the flu because it would be impossible to prove.

Click to expand...

If it's allegedly possible to prove that someone got sick from a vaccine, then it's possible to prove someone got sick from a disease.