Ex Nihilo Creation, the Big Bang Theory, and the First Law of Thermodynamics

ragarth

Well-Known Member
Nov 27, 2008
1,217
62
Virginia, USA
✟1,704.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
If you (or anyone) will agree that creatio ex nihilo violates the First Law of Thermodynamics, I will consider this thread to have served it purpose.

Haha, you'll have no problems with that. The first law of thermodynamics concerns the conservation of mass and energy, by it's very definition it precludes the production of mass or energy from nothing. I fail to see the point of making a point that people have made to you countless times.
 
Upvote 0

Ectezus

Beholder
Mar 1, 2009
802
42
✟8,683.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
I know you want me to answer your queries as you wrote them --- do you mind if I expect the same?

Fair enough.

If you know any passages by heart I'd gladly hear them in a PM. Or maybe create your own topic about it? Since you love Ex Nihilo so much. :)

Thing is, I've yet to see that the bible talks really about Ex Nihilo for certain, but like I said before, I don't know the book inside out so I'm simply asking for clarification from someone who knows the book a little better.

If you want this thread being about the assumption that god supposidly created the universe ex nihilo than that's fine. I just question the validity of your assumption and would like to see some proof for it.
Afterall, what good is your conclusion if your assumption isn't correct to begin with..?

But alas, you've shrugged of my question twice even though I'm asking for a simple bible sentence.
But ok, your thread, your rules.


- Ectezus
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Haha, you'll have no problems with that. The first law of thermodynamics concerns the conservation of mass and energy, by it's very definition it precludes the production of mass or energy from nothing. I fail to see the point of making a point that people have made to you countless times.
Keep in mind too, that according to Genesis 1 ex nihilo, the earth was in existence well before the First Law of Thermodynamics was instituted.

Note to Ectezus, et. al.: According to Genesis 1 ex materia, the earth was in existence well after the First Law of Thermodynamics.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If you know any passages by heart I'd gladly hear them in a PM. Or maybe create your own topic about it? Since you love Ex Nihilo so much. :)
Not 'by heart' --- but for the record ---
Psalm 33:6 said:
By the word of the LORD were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.
John 1:3 said:
All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
Romans 4:17b said:
... even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not as though they were.
Hebrews 11:3 said:
Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
And finally, the passage that supports Embedded Age:
2 Peter 3:5a said:
For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old...
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,711
17,630
55
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟393,323.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Keep in mind too, that according to Genesis 1 ex nihilo, the earth was in existence well before the First Law of Thermodynamics was instituted.

Note to Ectezus, et. al.: According to Genesis 1 ex materia, the earth was in existence well after the First Law of Thermodynamics.

Genesis 1 (King James Version)
1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Nothing about it being Ex Nihilo according to Your post, now kindly show where in Genesis 1 it states Ex Nihilo
 
Upvote 0

WilliamduBois

BenderBendingRodriguez
Mar 11, 2006
252
9
Desselgem, WVL, Belgium
Visit site
✟7,964.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Keep in mind too, that according to Genesis 1 ex nihilo, the earth was in existence well before the First Law of Thermodynamics was instituted.

And light was there before the sun and stars were created. Plants before photosynthesis.

We'll all say those are impossible too. We gladly do as well.
 
Upvote 0

BananaSlug

Life is an experiment, experience it!
Aug 26, 2005
2,454
106
39
In a House
✟10,782.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
It shows that the First Law of Thermodynamics was not present when the earth and the sun and the stars and the moon were created.

Or they were and God just circumvented them because he is omnipotent?

If fact, plants and animals were in existence before the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics were put in place.

Most likely the 1st and 2nd laws came into effect the first instance of creation. If the Second Law of Thermodynamics did not exist then there could be no heat conduction on the planet. In simple terms, the second law is an expression of the fact that over time differences in temperature, pressure, and density tend to even out in a physical system that is isolated from the outside world. Entropy is a measure of how much this evening-out process has progressed.
Again we see the misuse of scientific language and terms by a creationist.

This universe was quite a bit different back in Genesis 1.
I wonder if the Sun was even yellow.

You're the one saying that God embedded age into the earth and universe.

Maybe the Sun was like a giant tomato in the sky.
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,711
3,761
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟242,764.00
Faith
Atheist
All this "law was put in place" reminds me of that old creationist misconception again: that natural laws are like judical laws, instituated to prescribe certain behaviours.

But as has been said so often before: natural laws are descriptive, not prescriptive. And, even if most people are ignorant of this fact, every description humans use include by necessity the natural laws.

Something we descripe as "plant" or "animal" includes the laws of thermodynamics. If they didn´t, these things would not be what we would recognize as "plan" or "animal".

I know that this is a little difficult to understand with the concept of thermodynamics, but just consider that a statement that said: "Plants were around before mass, height, lenght and width were put in place."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
All this "law was put in place" reminds me of that old creationist misconception again: that natural laws are like judical laws, instituated to prescribe certain behaviours.

But as has been said so often before: natural laws are descriptive, not prescriptive. And, even if most people are ignorant of this fact, every description humans use include by necessity the natural laws.

Something we descripe as "plant" or "animal" includes the laws of thermodynamics. If they didn´t, these things would not be what we would recognize as "plan" or "animal".

I know that this is a little difficult to understand with the concept of thermodynamics, but just consider that a statement that said: "Plants were around before mass, height, lenght and width were put in place."
This is a point creationists here do not get. When the Universe came into existance, it came into existance with certain physical laws that describe it. There is no putting the first law into place, then putting the second law in later, etc. It only works with all the laws functioning, or it doesn't work at all.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is a point creationists here do not get. When the Universe came into existance, it came into existance with certain physical laws that describe it. There is no putting the first law into place, then putting the second law in later, etc. It only works with all the laws functioning, or it doesn't work at all.
Will the New Earth need those laws?

(Please answer this.)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'll answer if you can tell me what "Eternity Future" is. I have not heard that term before.
That period of time starting after the last dispensation (Kingdom), when Jesus hands the universe over to His Father, and running ∞ years.
 
Upvote 0

Skaloop

Agnostic atheist, pro-choice anti-abortion
May 10, 2006
16,332
899
47
Burnaby
Visit site
✟29,046.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-NDP
That period of time starting after the last dispensation (Kingdom), when Jesus hands the universe over to His Father, and running ∞ years.

Well, then, in such a situation, whether entropy still applies would be up to God.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If it is in this universe... yes.
So God will have to constantly supply His Creation with energy, or it will run down into thermal equilibrium as well?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,851,109
51,508
Guam
✟4,909,160.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Well, then, in such a situation, whether entropy still applies would be up to God.
So now it's arbitrary?

But it wasn't in Genesis 1?

(LOL --- amazing how someone can start out a thread about conditions in Genesis 1 --- try so hard to keep people on-topic --- and a few posts later, you've gone from Genesis 1 to Eternity Future.)
 
Upvote 0