Calling all Creationists, I need your help please

Will Mr. Joe Hovah's address suffice? I think with a name like that, he might be a foreigner, though.

You need to invent a time machine and warp back in time 2000 years if you wish to do this.

By the way, how is this relevant to the creation-evolution discussion? 

Originally posted by notMichaelJackson
Would you please tell me the name of the God responsible for putting all of the above mentioned wonders here for us to enjoy. I would like to give him my personal thanks and apologize for not giving him his just dues in the first place. 

Click to expand...

Isaiah 9:6 
    And His name will be called
    Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
    Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Here is the address:

Matthew 6:9-10
    In this manner, therefore, pray:

    Our Father in heaven,
    Hallowed be Your name.
    [10] Your kingdom come.
    Your will be done
    On earth as it is in heaven.



 

Originally posted by JohnR7
Isaiah 9:6 
    And His name will be called
    Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God,
    Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.

Here is the address:

Matthew 6:9-10
    In this manner, therefore, pray:

    Our Father in heaven,
    Hallowed be Your name.
    [10] Your kingdom come.
    Your will be done
    On earth as it is in heaven.



 

Click to expand...

wow that's some address.

You know, the funny thing is, there was a time a while back when God *did* have an email address. See, many Jews believe that, if you write a prayer down and stick it in the Wailing Wall, that God will hear it. So someone set up a fax service, and they would put things in the Wall for you. And someone set up an email forwarder.... Unfortunately, by now, it's probably been shut down, on the grounds that God probably doesn't need to know that MORTGAGE RATES LOWEST IN 30 YEARS!!! and *certainly* doesn't want to see the rest of the spam we all get.



Seriously, though, this question is totally pointless, and really, does more to make you look silly than to make creationists look silly. One of the first things to do when trying to insult or poke fun at someone's beliefs is to understand them, and I think it's fair to say that even a *sliver* of understanding would have revealed that creationists make no claims that would suggest that God is reachable via e-mail or snail mail, so asking for these addresses, and complaining if you don't get them, just makes you look ignorant about creationism. Given that creationism is a theory which can be stated in under a hundred words, that makes you look lazy.

Not saying you *are* lazy, that's just how most people will see this.

I think that you aren't lazy, just ignorant.

notMichaelJackson,

Either you just don't understand or are a SCOFFER!

Were you raised with any Church participation?
Were your parents agnostics/atheists?

You cannot put Mans' limitations on God.

Time and Age cannot be applied on him.
Origin cannot be applied on him.
Some simple ethics:
God is stronger than you!
God Smarter than you!
God could do a whole lot of things that you cannot do!

There is much logical scientific explanation for understanding the Bible its callled Creation Science,these are some links:

www.creationministries.org
www.creationscience.org
www.answersingenesis.org

and

www.dinosauradventureland.com

is OK also,but not as effective as the other 3 listed.

Examine them for yourself and if you agree and need help PM me....


In Christ,

Hector

Originally posted by Hector Medina
notMichaelJackson,

Either you just don't understand or are a SCOFFER!

Click to expand...

You say "SCOFFER!" like it's a bad thing.

Were you raised with any Church participation?
Were your parents agnostics/atheists?

Click to expand...

What does this have to do with anything?

You cannot put Mans' limitations on God.

Time and Age cannot be applied on him.
Origin cannot be applied on him.
Some simple ethics:
God is stronger than you!
God Smarter than you!
God could do a whole lot of things that you cannot do!

Click to expand...

Can you explain how he did them? No? Then where's the "science"?

There is much logical scientific explanation for understanding the Bible its callled Creation Science,these are some links:

Click to expand...

I haven't seen much on any of those links which I would associate with the words "logic" or "science."

You just said that time, age, and origin don't apply to God. Do any of the laws of nature apply to God?
So where does the "science" part come in?

Nathan Poe,

I will admit that *religion itself* cannot be compared to science.
However,much of the information in the Bible can be scientifaclly rescearched,then a theory could be made using religion.


Please note,Evolution also is a form of religion.


In Christ,

Hector

Please note,Evolution also is a form of religion.

Click to expand...

Come on not this stuff again.

Yap Seesaw,

I'm here to make you lose your sleep again.......

BTW: Albert Einstein also said(probably later then your coment posted)that he believed in God,- above all things!

and I'll post this again too:

www.drdino.com
Kent Hovind
Creation Science Evangelism


Toodles,

Hector

BTW: Albert Einstein also said(probably later then your coment posted)that he believed in God,- above all things!

Click to expand...

Can you back up this?

Hector, are you aware that posting a link to Hovind's site is *hurting* your case?

Originally posted by Hector Medina
Yap Seesaw,

I'm here to make you lose your sleep again.......

Click to expand...

Yep.. it's hard to sleep and laugh at the same time. 

BTW: Albert Einstein also said(probably later then your coment posted)that he believed in God,- above all things!

Click to expand...

I think you "forgot" to include a source for your quote. That often happens when people fabricate them. Allow me to offer some real quotes from Einstein:

"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the kind that we experience in ourselves. Neither can I nor would I want to conceive of an individual that survives his physical death; let feeble souls, from fear or absurd egoism, cherish such thoughts. I am satisfied with the mystery of the eternity of life and with the awareness and a glimpse of the marvelous structure of the existing world, together with the devoted striving to comprehend a portion, be it ever so tiny, of the Reason that manifests itself in nature." --The World as I See It.

"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere.... Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." --"Religion and Science," New York Times Magazine, November 9, 1930.

"Scientific research is based on the idea that everything that takes place is determined by laws of nature, and therefore this holds for the action of people. For this reason, a research scientist will hardly be inclined to believe that events could be influenced by a prayer, i.e. by a wish addressed to a Supernatural Being." --1936, responding to a child's question about whether scientists pray. Quoted in Albert Einstein: The Human Side. 

"I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it." -- 1954, Quoted in Albert Einstein: The Human Side,

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms." -- Obituary in The New York Times, April 19, 1955.



And the most important one:

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it." --Quoted in Albert Einstien: The Human Side

Well, there you have it, Hector. Either you're lying or you've been lied to. Which is it?

Yep.. it's hard to sleep and laugh at the same time.

Click to expand...

Heh.

Originally posted by Hector Medina
and I'll post this again too:

www.drdino.com
Kent Hovind
Creation Science Evangelism

Click to expand...

And we'll laugh at this again too.

Aside from the 3,127 things we could say(and have already said) about Kent Hovind, it seems that you've made the case against him yourself.

"Creation Science Evangelism."

Is it science or is it evangelism? Hovind doesn't care; he'll call it whatever sells the most videos.

 

There is much logical scientific explanation for understanding the Bible its callled Creation Science. 

Click to expand...

Creation Science....an oxymoron not unlike Military Intelligence

Creation Science does not practice Science, it practices hearsay.

Read John 1:1 for your answer

Originally posted by tacoman528
Read John 1:1 for your answer

Click to expand...

What question are you answering to?