Is fundemantalism ever a good thing?

Status
Not open for further replies.

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟19,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
To Levi501,
Yes it is saying that and it is also saying love through the Spirit not the law and do not use the freedom to indulge in the sinful nature.
<staff edit>

Jesus is saying the sum and the spirit of the law is love.
So again acting with loving intention in your heart is the only rule when judging something as sinful or not.

Back to the OP - this is what fundimentalist don't get. This is why they fail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To Sitswithamouse,
My name is Sitswithamouse BTW and not Sistwithamouse,
My apologies for the typo.


Not all liberals are this and not all fundies are that.
It depends on what ones classification is and by what.


Those christians who would lie and use laws to stop others rights to marry(I really don't want to get into the homosexual debate again if possible) so that they are not breaching the rules of the purity laws are the ones I was reffering to in my post.
Not really. Society makes judgements on what is right and wrong, for example neither of us I guess would legalise paedophilia because we think it is wrong, yet paedophiles probably don&#8217;t think it is wrong and they are also in society. So the argument about stopping rights is subjective not only about what are rights, but also about whether they should be stopped.


I don't see compassion and mercy in these christians , I see them upholding the same roles as the pharisees and to some extent upholding their own prejudices and using the bible to get around their own sins.
that depends on what the prejudices are, if you are now referring to same sex relations the Pharisees weren&#8217;t out of step with Jesus knowing that same sex acts along with adultery was wrong&#8230;. but they would have been out of step on the condemnation.

The purity laws in Judaism were geared more to political ends than Godly ends and it can be seen again today all over again..
Yes but Christianity is not Judaism and you seem to neither accept the Judaic view on same sex acts (Gen 19, Lev 18 & 20, Judges 19) nor the new covenant in Christ, Gen 2, Matt 19, Mark 10, Eph 5, 1 Cor 5-7, 1 Tim 1, Romans 1, 2 Peter 2, Jude 1)
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To levi501,

Jesus is saying the sum and the spirit of the law is love.
So again acting with loving intention in your heart is the only rule when judging something as sinful or not.
On the contrary, we don&#8217;t judge what is sinful, Jesus has saved us from what is sinful and told us. Love is salvation from sin.
1 John 4, so we cant use our freedom to indulge in it.

Back to the OP - this is what fundimentalist don't get. This is why they fail.
It seems to me what you refer to as fundamentalists have the gospel and non-fundamentalists don&#8217;t.

Love includes restoring brothers from sin Gal 6.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,546
1,328
56
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
I never said that it was.

The intention behind your actions, whether it be truly loving or unloving is the only metric for determining right and wrong. This is explicitly stated by Jesus.

Then you should understand that a person who calls a fellow sinner to repentance is showing precisely the same sort of love Christ showed for us. Again,

Matt 9:13

13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy , and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
KJV

So one way to love your neighbor is to emulate Christ in calling them to repentance. That's impossible to do if you cannot demonstrate there is anything to repent from without being guilty of being unloving.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟19,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
To levi501,

On the contrary, we don&#8217;t judge what is sinful, Jesus has saved us from what is sinful and told us. Love is salvation from sin.
1 John 4, so we cant use our freedom to indulge in it.

It seems to me what you refer to as fundamentalists have the gospel and non-fundamentalists don&#8217;t.
Love includes restoring brothers from sin Gal 6.
you poor thing.

Jesus commands us to act out of love. He says that all the laws and prophets are summed up by love. He says he who acts out of love has fulfilled the law. He says acting out of love is the spirit of the law.

So tell me when someone acts in accordance with what Jesus has mandated can that ever possibly be sinful? And for the reverse - is acting contrary to Jesus's mandate, acting unloving, ever not sinful?
Exactly, you act out of loving intention you're following Jesus. When you don't you aren't following him.
Following him = righteous.
Not following him = sinful.

Pop Quiz:
So what's the only metric for determining how one should act according to Jesus....

Answer:
Love


It really is that easy.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,546
1,328
56
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
John 14:15

15 If ye love me, keep my commandments .
KJV

John 15:10-14

10 If ye keep my commandments , ye shall abide in my love; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love.

11 These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy might remain in you, and that your joy might be full.

12 This is my commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you.

13 Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.

14 Ye are my friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you.
KJV

Note the emphasis on obedience as a sign of love.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟19,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Then you should understand that a person who calls a fellow sinner to repentance is showing precisely the same sort of love Christ showed for us. Again,

So one way to love your neighbor is to emulate Christ in calling them to repentance. That's impossible to do if you cannot demonstrate there is anything to repent from without being guilty of being unloving.
The problem is when the christian calling the person to repentence has incorrectly judged an act as unloving.
Sometimes only god can know a person's heart and in these cases you should encourage the person to reflect on their actions and motives and question whether they were acting in accordance with Jesus. You can't assume they weren't because you honestly don't know.
So calling them to reprent when it is demonstrated they are acting out of unloving intent is a loving act in itself.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To levi501,
you poor thing.
Really? so you don&#8217;t believe Gal 6 and love includes restoring brothers from sin? And we should indulge in the sinful nature?


Jesus commands us to act out of love. He says that all the laws and prophets are summed up by love. He says he who acts out of love has fulfilled the law. He says acting out of love is the spirit of the law.
Absolutely, He also says if we obey His teaching we act out of love (John 14-17) However when it comes to some teaching some don&#8217;t see it as love.


The problem is when the christian calling the person to repentence has incorrectly judged an act as unloving.
But that&#8217;s not what Jesus NT says. Repentance is from sin. Sin is what Christ has saved us from, its not for us to judge what Christ has said is sin, isn&#8217;t sin.


Sometimes only god can know a person's heart and in these cases you should encourage the person to reflect on their actions and motives and question whether they were acting in accordance with Jesus. You can't assume they weren't because you honestly don't know.
So calling them to reprent when it is demonstrated they are acting out of unloving intent is a loving act in itself.
Only God can truly know a person&#8217;s heart at all times, sure what comes out of the mouth is the overflow of the heart and one can observe the fruit of the actions. If someone murders another one knows they weren&#8217;t acting in accordance with Jesus NT teaching which says murder is wrong.(eg Matt 15, Mark 10, 1 Cor 6, 1 Tim 1, Romans 1)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,546
1,328
56
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
...and then notice how he then tells you his commandments are summed up/fulfilled/followed when you act out of love.

It makes sense. You are obedient when you act out of love.

You asserted earlier though that we cannot tell when someone is not acting out of love. This is not true. The verses above state quite overtly that you can judge based on obedience. 'You are my friend if you do as I have said."

This is clarified many times over. Jesus does not condemn the law. He fulfills it. His coming did not make the law evil. Rather, the law gave us understanding to know why Jesus came, and why He will come again.

I see no support for your assertion that we cannot know someone is acting within God's will or not. We are told to judge by the fruit. We are told to exclude people from the church until and unless they repent. We are told exactly the sorts of things they need to repent from.

Your argument is that love takes precedence, but when questioned in detail, you have had to admit that correcting a sinner is an act of love, since that is more or less what you feel you are doing too.

Now you'd need to explain to me why you pass judgment. Since you do the same thing when you confront me or Brightmorningstar as we do when we confront you, and also refuse to acknowledge other scriptures which clarify some of the more complex issues we are faced with as a church body, I am unclear as to what exactly you feel you are achieving. You are simultaneously violating the tenets of your own argument and refusing to acknowledge the importance of many, many additional scriptures that touch on the subject.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟19,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You asserted earlier though that we cannot tell when someone is not acting out of love. This is not true. The verses above state quite overtly that you can judge based on obedience. 'You are my friend if you do as I have said."
Sometimes we can't tell the intentions behind a person's actions. And in these situations leave judgement to god.

Yes, obediance to loving thy neighbor. good job.

This is clarified many times over. Jesus does not condemn the law. He fulfills it. His coming did not make the law evil. Rather, the law gave us understanding to know why Jesus came, and why He will come again.
Yes, and he also sums the law up, reclarifies it and tells you in what light to evaluate it - that measurement being love.

I see no support for your assertion that we cannot know someone is acting within God's will or not. We are told to judge by the fruit. We are told to exclude people from the church until and unless they repent. We are told exactly the sorts of things they need to repent from.
Well if god's will is to act out of love towards each other - then in some situations you would need to read a person's mind to infer if their intentions were loving or unloving. So considering that humans aren't mind readers the proof is selfevident.

Judging the fruit is fine and dandy when it's obvious it's good or bad.
I'll wager in at least some situations we differ as to what is good and bad fruit.

Jesus knew that a silly laundry list of dos and do nots would lead people astray so he simplified it.


Your argument is that love takes precedence, but when questioned in detail, you have had to admit that correcting a sinner is an act of love, since that is more or less what you feel you are doing too.
Absolutely, encourage people to act out of love (correcting the sinner) is a loving act.

Now you'd need to explain to me why you pass judgment. Since you do the same thing when you confront me or Brightmorningstar as we do when we confront you, and also refuse to acknowledge other scriptures which clarify some of the more complex issues we are faced with as a church body, I am unclear as to what exactly you feel you are achieving.
lol, achieving? With you guys, nothing... for the peanut gallery maybe something. And that possibility of something is enough.

You are simultaneously violating the tenets of your own argument and refusing to acknowledge the importance of many, many additional scriptures that touch on the subject.
In my opinion you are being purposely obtuse.

Why talk about other scripture when Jesus clearly and simply states how to act in his accordance with his will? You can read all the other scripture you choose but anything that runs contrary to acting out of love is false or being viewed in a way Jesus didn't intend.
 
Upvote 0

gwenmead

On walkabout
Jun 2, 2005
1,611
283
Seattle
✟10,642.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Matthewj1985 said:
So my question is, have fundamentalist ever been a good thing for a society?

Well, I don't think that fundies are terribly good for a society, no.

But sometimes people seek in earnest to return to the basics of their religion, and that's not necessarily a bad thing. It tends to involve honest introspection and a diligent search, and I'm a fan of both of those things.

But fundies, well - that's a whole 'nuther matter.
 
Upvote 0

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,546
1,328
56
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
Sometimes we can't tell the intentions behind a person's actions. And in these situations leave judgement to god.

Yes, obediance to loving thy neighbor. good job.

Yes, and he also sums the law up, reclarifies it and tells you in what light to evaluate it - that measurement being love.

Well if god's will is to act out of love towards each other - then in some situations you would need to read a person's mind to infer if their intentions were loving or unloving. So considering that humans aren't mind readers the proof is selfevident.

Judging the fruit is fine and dandy when it's obvious it's good or bad.
I'll wager in at least some situations we differ as to what is good and bad fruit.

Jesus knew that a silly laundry list of dos and do nots would lead people astray so he simplified it.



Absolutely, encourage people to act out of love (correcting the sinner) is a loving act.


lol, achieving? With you guys, nothing... for the peanut gallery maybe something. And that possibility of something is enough.


In my opinion you are being purposely obtuse.

Why talk about other scripture when Jesus clearly and simply states how to act in his accordance with his will? You can read all the other scripture you choose but anything that runs contrary to acting out of love is false or being viewed in a way Jesus didn't intend.

I am not being obtuse at all. I will be very clear. I think you are asserting, without a shred of support, that "love" means granting license to do things and, specifically, to teach things that Christ Himself forbade. Christ says if you love Him, you will keep his commandments. He never demonized the law.

If you can prove otherwise, I'd be interested to see that, but latching on to a single verse and insisting it means one thing when it is well known not to mean what you assert is not convincing.
 
Upvote 0

levi501

Senior Veteran
Apr 19, 2004
3,286
226
✟19,690.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I am not being obtuse at all. I will be very clear. I think you are asserting, without a shred of support, that "love" means granting license to do things and, specifically, to teach things that Christ Himself forbade.
no, I'm not.
Christ says if you love Him, you will keep his commandments. He never demonized the law.
Yes, if you love him you will keep his two commandments.
He didn't demonize the law. He reclarified and explained it.

If you can prove otherwise, I'd be interested to see that, but latching on to a single verse and insisting it means one thing when it is well known not to mean what you assert is not convincing.
I think it's quite telling by your attempt to minimalize the verses I'm "latching" onto. And it's well known that fundimentalists share your opinion while the more liberal christians focus more on compassion and the commandment of love... which was the point of my original post in this thread.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Shane Roach

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2002
14,546
1,328
56
✟23,036.00
Faith
Christian
no, I'm not.

Yes, if you love him you will keep his two commandments.
He didn't demonize the law. He reclarified and explained it.

I think it's quite telling by your attempt to minimalize the verses I'm "latching" onto. And it's well known that fundimentalists share your opinion while the more liberal christians focus more on compassion and the commandment of love... which was the point of my original post in this thread.

No one can be a Christian fundamentalist and minimize the role of love in Christianity, but you did just demonstrably refuse to clarify your position, which was the point of my response to your post.

Love and license are not synonyms. You say you agree with this, but when pushed to clarify then why you refuse to acknowledge other verses that clarify how to love, how to correct in love and with tenderness, you simply refuse.
 
Upvote 0

Angel4Truth

Legend
Aug 27, 2003
27,676
4,634
Visit site
✟65,490.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In America we have to worry about fundamentalist Christians denying the rights of other, rejecting science and all around trying to legislate their morality with no basis in fact (all based on the bible which is only as valid as every other religious text on earth). Fundie Muslims all over the world are carrying out acts of violence based on a hodgepodge of revisionist who add and take away from Islam to serve their own benefit. The Ultra Orthodox in Israel have committed acts of violence on those who disagree and homosexuals and also are taking some heat for their treatment of women as second class citizans.

So my question is, have fundamentalist ever been a good thing for a society?

Allow us to remove all financial support from government and have our own then ask that question again when your schools an public institutions fail miserably like they already are as there are less and less of us.
 
Upvote 0
B

brightmorningstar

Guest
To Levi501,
Sometimes we can't tell the intentions behind a person's actions. And in these situations leave judgement to god.

Yes, obediance to loving thy neighbor. good job.
It seems to me the problem is a different definition of love according to the individual, rather than some common external benchmark. Is for example the intention of Fred Phelps comment 'God hates homosexuals' loving? He may feel so by warning people of the dangers of the potential barrier to the Kingdom. All we do is point out what he states is not scripturally correct, it seems those who suggest not to judge intentions are the ones who most judge intentions.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.