I also answered this question before I read the OP, so bump another no vote.
But this is not a subject that is up for voting. We are responsible to obey God, as He has given us his word in the Holy Scriptures. People today give all kinds of excuses for disobeying the scriptures, but that does not change what they say.
My contribution to this subject is the following, excerpted from my book, "The Pattern" (for the church, as outlined in the New Testament.) as this is too long for a single post, I have split it in two.
The Ministry of Women
The word of God says much about the ministry of women. In the New Testament they are often seen serving the church, laboring in the work of the gospel. We see this in Romans 16:1-2: I commend to you Phoebe our sister, who is a servant of the church in Cenchrea, that you may receive her in the Lord in a manner worthy of the saints, and assist her in whatever business she has need of you; for indeed she has been a helper of many and of myself also. A few verses later, in Romans 16:6, we read: Greet Mary, who labored much for us. Acts 9:36 tells us that At Joppa there was a certain disciple named Tabitha, which is translated Dorcas. This woman was full of good works and charitable deeds which she did. Acts 16:14 tells of a certain woman named Lydia, a seller of purple, of the city of Thyatira, which worshiped God. In verse 15 she gave the apostles lodging. Finally, Philippians 4:3 says: And I urge you also, true companion, help these women who labored with me in the gospel, with Clement also, and the rest of my fellow workers, whose names are in the Book of Life.
Women also figure prominently in the rest of Divine history. By faith Sarah herself also received strength to conceive seed, and she bore a child when she was past the age, because she judged Him faithful who had promised. (Hebrews 11:11) Rebekah, in obedience to God, crossed the desert to marry a man she had never met. (Genesis 24:33-58) Rachael and Leah obeyed the command of the Lord, leaving their childhood home with their husband Jacob. (Genesis 31:3-18) Hebrews 11:23 tells us that it was by faith that Jochebed hid her son Moses three months, not fearing the kings command. (Exodus 2:1-10, 6:20) Rahab hid the spies of Israel and pled for the lives of her family because she believed that the LORD your God, He is God in heaven above and on earth beneath. (Joshua 2:11) The angel who announced Samsons birth came first to his mother, not his father. And she obeyed the Lords command, raising Samson a Nazirite from the womb. (Judges 13:1-25, 16:17) Abigails wisdom saved David from committing murder. (1 Samuel 25:23-34) The wisdom of an unnamed woman saved the city of Abel from destruction. (2 Samuel 20:15-22) Entire books were devoted to the faith of Ruth and Esther, and to the love of Solomons wife.
In the New Testament, Martha and Mary, the sisters of Lazarus, served Jesus and His followers in their home. (Luke 10:38-42; John 12:1-3) Luke 8:3 tells us of certain women who had been healed of evil spirits and infirmities; Mary called Magdalene, out of whom had come seven demons, and Joanna the wife of Chuza, Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others who provided for Him from their substance." This Mary Magdalene is mentioned ten times in the gospels. Other women who took part in her godly service were the mother of Zebedee's sons. (Matthew 27:56) Mary the mother of James the Less and of Joses, and Salome, (Mark 15:40) Mary the mother of Jesus, and His mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas. (John 19:25)
The Holy Spirit has often spoken through women. Miriam the prophetess, the sister of Aaron, led the women of Israel in a song and dance of triumph. (Exodus 15:20) Deborah, a prophetess, the wife of Lapidoth (Judges 4:4) led an army that delivered Israel. Huldah the prophetess, the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe prophesied of the judgement of Israel. (2 Kings 22:14-20) Isaiahs wife was also called a prophetess. (Isaiah 8:3)
In the New Testament, aside from the words of angels, the first two recorded prophecies were given through women. These were the prophecy of Elizabeth in Luke 1:42-45 and Marys answer in Luke 1:46-55. After that we read of Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher... who did not depart from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. (Luke 2:36-37) When our Lord rose early on the first day of the week, He appeared first to Mary Magdalene. (Mark 16:9) She, and the other Mary (Matthew 28:1) were specifically commanded to go quickly and tell His disciples that He is risen from the dead, and indeed He is going before you into Galilee; there you will see Him. (Matthew 28:7) Finally, the second epistle of John was addressed to a woman. (2 John 1:1)
1 Timothy 3:11 gives us qualifications for the wife of a deacon. This would seem to indicate that the wives of deacons participate in their work. It would appear that Aquila and Priscilla are an example of this. Acts 18:2 introduces Aquila with his wife Priscilla. In Acts 18:26 we read that Aquila and Priscilla took Apollos aside and explained to him the way of God more accurately. In Romans 16:3-5 we read: Greet Priscilla and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, who risked their own necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks, but also all the churches of the Gentiles. Likewise greet the church that is in their house.
But while there are many things women may do in and for the church, they are forbidden to speak in its meetings or to take part in its leadership. This is a very unpopular idea in modern America, but the word of God could not be more clear on the subject. It is plainly stated in two places:
Let a woman learn in silence with all submission. And I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man, but to be in silence. (1 Timothy 2:11-12)
Let your women keep silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak; but they are to be submissive, as the law also says. And if they want to learn something, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it is shameful for women to speak in church. Or did the word of God come originally from you? Or was it you only that it reached? If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 14:34-37)
Could this language be stronger or more clear? Some pretend that these passages are not correctly translated. This is simply not true. It would be useless to examine the individual Greek words in these passages. Each Greek word in each of them is correctly rendered in our translation. Almost all widely recognized translations give the same basic meaning in each of these passages. Our translation is essentially unchanged in the King James, American Standard, Revised Standard, New Revised Standard, and New International versions of the Bible; the translation called Gods Word to the Nations; and the translations by Helen B. Montgomery, James Moffatt, William Kelly, J. N. Darby, Robert Young, Jay P. Green, and Heinz W. Cassirer, the New Greek English Interlinear New Testament, and the interlinear translations by Alfred Marshall and Thomas Newberry. There are minor differences in other translations charted in the back of this book, but the only really significant one is that instead of women, A. S. Worrell and Daniel H. Stern give wives and Richard Francis Weymouth gives their women. As explained in footnote 7 in the chapter on deacons, this is purely a matter of interpretation.
Some think this instruction was just the correction of a local problem in ancient Corinth. But it is specifically addressed to churches other than the one in Corinth, for it says that women are to keep silent in the churches, not the church. The Holy Spirit adds that it is shameful for women to speak in church. This is clearly a statement of a general principle, not just an instruction for a particular church. Indeed, the subject at hand was all the churches of the saints. We see this in the verse immediately before this passage: For God is not the author of confusion but of peace, as in all the churches of the saints. (1 Corinthians 14:33) Seven chapters earlier, the Apostle, though he was speaking of a different subject, said And so I ordain in all the churches. (1 Corinthians 7:17) We have already noticed that this book was not only addressed To the church of God which is at Corinth. It was also addressed to all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord. (1 Corinthians 1:2) There can therefore be no question that the command to Let your women keep silent in the churches was addressed to all who in every place call on the name of Jesus Christ our Lord.
Some attempt to minimize this rule by calling it Pauls. Many of those who reject it think they are unusually spiritual Christians. Some of them even claim to be prophets, and so they may be, but if they are, let them carefully notice the Apostles words: If anyone thinks himself to be a prophet or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things which I write to you are the commandments of the Lord. (1 Corinthians 14:37)
Paul further wrote:
For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should not be the servant of Christ. But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ. (Galatians 1:10-12)
We need to clearly understand that this rule comes from God, not from Paul.
People have invented many excuses for disobeying this rule, but that is all they are. They are only excuses. Some go so far as to claim that the Holy Spirit has shown them that these Scriptures do not apply to us today. They forget the words I am the LORD, I do not change. (Malachi 3:6) Their claim cannot possibly be true, for Pauls epistles are part of Scripture, (see 2 Peter 3:15-16) and our Lord Jesus Himself said that the Scripture cannot be broken. (John 10:35)
One group teaches that the reason for this rule was that the early church included many former prostitutes. These women, they say, had no idea how to behave themselves in the church, so they were commanded to be silent. They cannot even pretend to demonstrate this idea from the Bible. It is not there. Further, I personally know former prostitutes who have surrendered their hearts and lives to the authority of the Lord Jesus Christ. They have been washed in the blood of the Lamb, and are no longer unclean. They are no longer loud and uncouth, but have become beautiful and godly members of the body of Christ. They are now holy women, faultless before God and the Lamb. To say such things is not only an insult to these beautiful sisters, it is a gross insult to that Holy Blood that has washed them from their former sins and made them pure. In Acts 10:15 Peter was told, What God has cleansed you must not call common.
Another group claims that in the early church men sat in one place and women in another. They say that the women had begun to shout across the church, asking their husbands to ask questions. There is nothing in the entire New Testament to support such an idea. Nowhere does it mention even one church where men sat in one place and women in another, nor does it even hint at the idea that anyone was shouting in the church. Some claim that although the Scriptures say nothing of this, it is mentioned by other ancient writers. Even if this were correct, it would change nothing. If our God intended for us to consider such an idea, He would have included it in the Scriptures. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 says that all Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work. This passage makes three distinct points. The first two are that all Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable. But the third point is that all Scripture makes the man of God complete, that it makes him thoroughly equipped for every good work. If we needed to know historical facts from other sources in order to understand Scripture, then the Scriptures alone would not make us complete, and they would not make us thoroughly equipped for every good work. No doctrine is reliable if it is based on anything outside of the Bible.
Yet another group sets this rule aside because Galatians 3:27-28 says; as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. While this sounds good, it involves a very basic error. They are using their interpretation of the meaning of one Scripture to set aside the express statement of another Scripture. This is unacceptable in a Christian leader. The authority of Scripture is absolute and final. Anyone who rejects any portion of it is disqualified for leadership in the church. (Titus 1:9)
But in recent years a more subtle excuse has begun to be circulated. Certain well known and widely respected Christian leaders have begun to teach that these Scriptures were only deference to cultural norms in the ancient world. This statement has a comfortable and pleasant ring to it. Oh! Its all right. God will go along with the norms of our culture. Dont worry about it. But such an idea should offend a Christian. The very idea is evil. When did God ever bend His will to fit our culture? Indeed, His instruction to us is do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God. (Romans 12:2) But in addition to being evil, this idea is simply incorrect. Many, if not all, of the heathen religions of the Biblical world had priestesses, that is, women who led the worship of their false god. This well known historical fact proves that the contention is completely unfounded. The cultural norm of the age was that women partook in religious services. In fact, they not only partook, but even lead them. The rule that they must be silent was radical. It was a strange, new idea, as offensive in that day as it is today.