Markea posted in message #39:
The teaching of Matt 22 also makes me think that the
marriage is IN HEAVEN... because it speaks of the
KING (who would represent the Father in this story)
who was wroth with a guest that did not have on a
wedding garment. The Father is not on earth...
Matthew 22:1-13 is only a parable, which means that
we are not to get hung up on any of its details, but
focus on the message that the parable is trying to
convey: God allows all sorts of people to get saved,
but they can subsequently lose their salvation if
they fall into willful, unrepentant sin (Hebrews
10:26-29), so that they are not found wearing the
figurative wedding garment of righteousness
(Revelation 19:8).
If we try to latch onto every detail of Matthew
22:1-13, we will run into problems right away, for
we would have people making it into the Father's
house in heaven but then being subsequently cast out,
as if the Father didn't know who was in unrepentant
sin until they got all the way into heaven and were
already at the wedding. We would, in light of another
parable (Matthew 25:1-13), have both the wise and
foolish virgins making it into the wedding, and then
the foolish ones being subsequently cast out of the
wedding. We would have contradicting messages in two
different parables. That's why we can't latch onto the
details of the various parables: the details contradict
each other. So we have to take a step back and instead
look for the common message that all the parables are
trying to convey: we have to be ready and righteous
for Jesus' return.
Markea posted in message #39:
The OT story of Abraham sending the comforter to find
a bride for his son Isaac also makes me think that
the marriage is in HEAVEN... because at the end of
the journey... Isaac met her and took her into his
mother's tent... ie, the Jerusalem which is above is
the mother of us all...
If we try to latch onto the details of the story of
Isaac and Rebekah as having to be a type for Jesus
and the Church, it doesn't work. For Rebekah was
brought from a far-away land to where Isaac was in
his own land, whereas Jesus at His second coming will
come Himself from a far-away land (heaven) to come
and be with the Church on the earth. Isaac took
Rebecca not into the Father's house (heaven), but the
house of his mother (earth). The house of his mother
can't be New Jerusalem in heaven, for his mother had
just died (Genesis 24:67), and New Jerusalem isn't
going to die. But we could say that the earth will
have suffered somewhat of a dying during the
tribulation.
---
Markea posted in message #54:
You're certainly wrong about Israel being the church...
If Israel can't be the Church, how can Rebekah be the
Church? Rebekah is the mother of Israel (Jacob)
(Genesis 25:21-26, 32:28). Similarly with Matthew
chapters 24-25: in the pre-trib view, if Matthew 24
can't be the Church, how can Matthew 25 be the Church?
If Matthew 24 is Israel, how can Matthew 25 not be
Israel?
The Church is Israel (Revelation 21:9b,12b). All Jews
in the Church are Israel (Romans 11:1), and all
Gentiles in the Church have been grafted into the good
olive tree of Israel (Romans 11:24, cf. Jeremiah 11:16),
made fellowcitizens in Israel (Ephesians 2:12,19), and
made the seed of Abraham (Galatians 3:29). The entire
Church being Israel is necessary because the new
covenant/testament under which the Church is saved
(Matthew 26:28; 1 Corinthians 11:25; 2 Corinthians 3:6,
Hebrews 9:15) was made only with Israel (Jeremiah
31:31-34).