30 years!?

radhead

Contributor
Feb 20, 2006
13,499
602
✟63,827.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
I can't believe that in just a couple of years, bands like U2 and REM will have been going strong for 30 years.

30 years! When I was growing up the 30-year status was reserved for oldies acts like Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis, Ray Charles, Johnny Cash, etc.

But this seems unreal.
 

Fremdin

Contributor
Jan 26, 2008
6,391
639
✟17,104.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The difference between Aerosmith and a band like U2 or R.E.M. is that I can remember them being the definition of cutting edge and R.E.M. was such an esoteric band in the 80's liking R.e.M. really meant that you were cool because they were so left of the dial. And U2 totally changed the game with Achtung Baby in my opinion. Here you had the biggest band in the world making fun of being rockstars on the ZooTV tour. Also it was such a departure from their earlier work, it was dark and sexual and conflicted. In short it was awesome. ANd R.E.M. was the definition of American Alternative. They didn't change for anybody, people changed for them.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

radhead

Contributor
Feb 20, 2006
13,499
602
✟63,827.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Bob Rock? You mean Load? I kind of liked Load

Not only that. The first album he did with them was the untitled Black album. I always hated "Enter Sandman" and after watching the documentary of that album (Year In the Life of Metallica) I immediately understood why. Bob Rock made them change the way they played, the way they wrote their music. I would have loved to have heard "Enter Sandman" the way they originally wrote it. Bob was a failed new wave pop star who had no business producing a real metal band.

"And Justice For All" was the last REAL Metallica album.

A few years ago a group of Metallica fan-club members wrote an open letter to Metallica, asking them to get rid of Bob Rock. Metallica agreed.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

radhead

Contributor
Feb 20, 2006
13,499
602
✟63,827.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Wikipedia...
Metallica
Main article: Metallica

Bob Rock produced Metallica's multiplatinum self-titled album (known as The Black Album) in 1991 and subsequent followups Load (1996), ReLoad (1997), Garage Inc. (1998) and S&M (1999). Metallica once again tapped Rock to produce their 2003 album St. Anger.

Rock played bass guitar for the recording of St. Anger.

A petition that over 20,000 fans signed was posted online. The petition called for Metallica to dump Rock as producer, claiming he had too much influence on the band's sound and musical format. Rock claimed the petition was hurtful for his children. He was also quoted as saying "Sometimes, even with a great coach, a team keeps losing. You have to get new blood in there." It is often said that Rock "Ruined the greatest metal band in history."

In February, 2006, Metallica chose producer Rick Rubin to produce their next album, ending the group's long-time relationship with Rock.

...Personally, I wouldn't go so far as to say he "ruined" Metallica. They were millionaires by the time he came along. I'm sure they all wanted to do something new. I couldn't expect them to keep that same anger and energy of a metal band, you know, after they were able to afford yachts?
 
Upvote 0

Fremdin

Contributor
Jan 26, 2008
6,391
639
✟17,104.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's one way to look at it, or maybe they were tired of doing the same thing over and over again so they wanted to grow artisically. I have a friend who thinks Nine Inch Nails has ruined themselves n the past couple of years. But I think that keeping up that kind of anger and intensity is unfair to the artist. A person can't live their live without evolving so one shouldn't ask a band to do the same thing.
 
Upvote 0
I

ImperialPhantom

Guest
Metallica has every right to go in any musical direction that they so choose. Rock might have given them a sound that the purists and original fans disliked, but they did what they set out to do: to sell massive amounts of albums and win millions of new fans. They've got families to feed, they've grown up a lot since they were kids playing their old style of music, and heck, they like nice houses and nice cars just as much as we all do. If they want to make millions and live the dream, as far as I'm concerned, they should seize the chance. I don't believe in "selling out". Yeah, now Rock's time as come, but they still did what they did with him as a producer, and now they want to go in a different direction with their sound. And Rubin's not exactly an underground hardcore metal producer himself.
 
Upvote 0