- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,200
- 518
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
When did the Messianic movement start?
Does it draw out Hebrew Catholics?
Does it draw out Hebrew Catholics?
Last edited by a moderator:
Nothing in my opinion... but there are some who think otherwise.What does Messianic have to do with Catholic? (Seriously asking)
A - just over 2000 years ago; B - around 1967When did the Messianic movement start?
sometimes, but not many - the Catholics have found a way to maintain their belief of being the best closest and only expression of apostolic faith and provide a "Messianic" expression within the confines of the Mother Church.Does it draw out Hebrew Catholics?
When did the Messianic movement start?
When did the Messianic movement start?
Ditto, Tishri, glad you dropped the cucumber suit.
Yeh once my cucumber suit turned into a pickle suit I knew it was time to changeDitto, Tishri, glad you dropped the cucumber suit.
When did the Messianic movement start?
Does it draw out Hebrew Catholics?
Had to read that a few times, but I got it. LL!Yeh once my cucumber suit turned into a pickle suit I knew it was time to change
On the day of Shavuot. For the thousands that came to be followers of Yeshua on that eventful Shavuot were not added to the Christian Church (which was not yet in existence), but to the followers of The Way (so the disciples of Yeshua were called, cf. Acts 9:2; 19:9, 23; 24:14, 22), a sect of Judaism. Nor did they see themselves as some new entity, or some new beginning. Rather, they saw the revival of faith among Jews as well as the ingathering of the Gentiles as evidence of the faithfulness of God to Israel, keeping His covenant promises to make Israel a light to the nations, and to bless the nations by bringing them to that light. Therefore the Messianic movements started at Acts 2. And has always been a thread of Messianic from that time till now.
That Messianic movement did indeed start at Pentecost (Acts 2), and the eventual result was the establishment of the early church - the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic church (not to be confused with the Roman Catholic church - which left the rest of the church in 1054).
The modern messianic movement has very little in common with the original. The modern messianic movement came out of Protestant Christianity, which came out of Roman Christianity, which at that point was already 500 years removed from Orthodox Christianity.
It was not long, however, until the emerging Christian Church of the 2nd Century CE began to interpret the events of that Shavuot very differently. Having begun the split from the synagogue, theOn the day of Shavuot. For the thousands that came to be followers of Yeshua on that eventful Shavuot were not added to the Christian Church (which was not yet in existence), but to the followers of The Way (so the disciples of Yeshua were called, cf. Acts 9:2; 19:9, 23; 24:14, 22), a sect of Judaism. Nor did they see themselves as some new entity, or some new beginning. Rather, they saw the revival of faith among Jews as well as the ingathering of the Gentiles as evidence of the faithfulness of God to Israel, keeping His covenant promises to make Israel a light to the nations, and to bless the nations by bringing them to that light. Therefore the Messianic movements started at Acts 2.
Where may I ask are you getting your information? Sources please.That Messianic movement did indeed start at Pentecost (Acts 2), and the eventual result was the establishment of the early church - the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic church (not to be confused with the Roman Catholic church - which left the rest of the church in 1054).
The modern messianic movement has very little in common with the original. The modern messianic movement came out of Protestant Christianity, which came out of Roman Christianity, which at that point was already 500 years removed from Orthodox Christianity.
Where may I ask are you getting your information? Sources please.
First of all, is an internet source required for every bit of information? How can you compress years of research, from literally dozens of sources (online and off-line), into something you can post on the internet.
What I posted is known history. Of course alot of false histories exist as well about a great many topics, not just religion. It's actually quite incredible how inexact a science archaeology is.
Anyhow, I apologize for posting in your forums. And here's a link with a bit of historical interest, a recent archaeological find.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/wor...eloved-God-worshipped-Christ-alive-found.html