Here are a number of scientific reasons why the Big Bang theory is unworkable and fallacious.
This should be fun.
1 - The Big Bang theory is based on theoretical extremes. It may look good in math calculations, but it can’t actually happen.
Apart from you know the physical evidence supporting the notion of the a 'big bang'
A tiny bit of nothing packed so tightly together that it blew up and produced all the matter in the universe.
Liar! Nothing blew up, and it wasn't a tiny bit of nothing. Seriously have you actually researched the big bang?
Seriously now, this is a fairy tale.
Or just you contorting the facts.
It is easy to theorize that something is true, when it has never been seen and there is no definitive evidence that it exists or ever happened.
Funny, then why did cosmic microwave background radiation discovered in 1964 provide strong evidence that the univers expanded and has naturally cooled from an extremely hot, dense initial state. Or how about the relative proportion of light elements in the universe. The observed abundances of hydrogen and helium throughout the cosmos closely match the calculated predictions for the formation of these elements from nuclear processes in the rapidly expanding and cooling first minutes of the universe, as logically and quantitatively detailed according to Big Bang nucleosynthesis.
Let us not mistake Disneyland theories for science.
Asinine.
2 - Nothingness cannot pack together. It would have no way to push itself into a pile.
The only person stating it was nothing is you.
3 - A vacuum has no density. It is said that the nothingness got very dense, and that is why it exploded. But a total vacuum is the opposite of total density.
First go read upon vacuum energy density, secondly there was no explosion involved. And again nobody says there was nothing apart from you and your creationist cronies.
More
4 - There would be no ignition to explode nothingness.
The Big Bang ≠ Explosion
The Big Bang ≠ Nothing exploding
...
It could not be a chemical explosion, for no chemicals existed.
...it wasn't an explosion
It could not be a nuclear explosion, for there were no atoms!
...it wasn't an explosion
5 - There is no way to expand it.
See you make this assertion but you provide nothing to support it.
How can you expand what isn’t there?
The only person saying there was nothing there is you, so why don't you explain it.
Even if that magical vacuum could somehow be pulled together by gravity, what would then cause the pile of emptiness to push outward?
M-theory possibly.
The "gravity" which brought it together would keep it from expanding.
Just like the gravity that keeps our feet planted firmly on earth stops us from ever leaving it...
6 - Nothingness cannot produce heat.
... the only person stating it was nothingness is you.
The intense heat caused by the exploding nothingness is said to have changed the nothingness into protons, neutrons, and electrons.
Again, no.
First, an empty vacuum in the extreme cold of outer space cannot get hot by itself.
Liar... it wasn't empty
Second, an empty void cannot magically change itself into matter.
Liar... it wasn't empty
Third, there can be no heat without an energy source.
You see this line of thought... keep it in mind, then actually go do some research.
[/QUOTE]
But to summarize for you, the big bang? Factual phenomena. It has theoretical models to describe it. You don't seem to have even a basic grasp of what the big bang is, or what any of the theoretic models describing it are.
Try sticking to actual, commendable science sites if you want to get technical on a scientific issue. NASA, JPL, AAAS, SLAC, LAMBDA, WMAP, ESU, they all have great, in-depth sites. Use them. They're free. And here's the kicker - they're actual scientific organizations, not a website constructed by people with a case of severe intellectual dishonesty.
Go play in the sandbox.