universally accepted not because it can be proven by logically coherent evidence to be true, but becuase the only aternative, special creation, is clearly incredible" Watson,1929
"the theory of evolution,a theory...
- Thread starter Freedom777
- Start date
Because you keep refering to evolution as a fact and it most certainly is not.I'm not talking about micro-evolution only particals to man evolution.anyway i'll let it rest.
Upvote
0
No I don't armagedenman, but their is more than one way to interpret it. evidence i mean
Upvote
0
Originally posted by Freedom777
Because you keep refering to evolution as a fact and it most certainly is not.I'm not talking about micro-evolution only particals to man evolution.anyway i'll let it rest.
And you prove this by repeatedly quoting creationists?
I don't know about everyone else, but I'm sure as heck convinced.
Upvote
0
Originally posted by Freedom777
No I don't armagedenman, but their is more than one way to interpret it. evidence i mean
So why hasn´t any creationist come up with a scientific theory using the evidence used to back up the theories of evolution?
Upvote
0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
That's why you formulate hypotheses and make deductions from them. Those deductions become evidence you should find if the hypothesis is true. IOW, you predict in advance the evidence you should find.
When you find the opposite, then your hypothesis is falsified. This is what has happened to young earth creationism. Scientists like Buckland, Sedgwick, Woodward, and Owen in the early 1800s predicted the type of evidence they should find in biological organisms if they were specially created. When they found the opposite, special creation was in big trouble, and young earth was falsified outright by 1830. They admitted special creation and young earth were falsified.
What we have now are a group of people, for mistaken religious reasons, simply won't admit that the theory is falsified. Invoking "more than one way to interpret" evidence is simply another way of denial.
Upvote
0
No, no - you're misquoting. Watson asked Holmes, "From what school did you get your silly notion that evolution is actually true?" To which Holmes replied, "Elementary, my dear Watson."
Upvote
0
Similar threads
- Locked
