Is God A Sexist

Status
Not open for further replies.

JWNEWMAN

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2006
5,182
136
✟21,154.00
Faith
Christian
Actually, God didn't design gender roles, because they don't objectively exist in reality, only in the minds of people who believe in them. Saying that God designed gender roles would be like saying that God designed flying pigs. :)
Flying pigs? Now that's something you don't see every day!

Let me see no gender roles? Hmmm... off the top of my head I think... yes, being a Mother is a gender specific role, God created. Father, yes that is also gender specific, don't you think?
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,337
1,471
37
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟133,073.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Flying pigs? Now that's something you don't see every day!

Let me see no gender roles? Hmmm... of the top of my head I think... yes, being a Mother is a gender specific role, God created. Father, yes that is also gender specific, don't you think?

Hmm... It depends on what you mean by "mother" and "father". When it comes to reproduction, then there's is a biological difference between the mother and the father, because it's the mother that gets pregnant. :) But I didn't mean biological differences based on anatomy... I meant the traditional gender roles, such as the idea of men having more authority, and stuff like that. :) Outside of biological differences when it comes to reproduction, "mother" and "father" are just two gender-specific words for the same thing... a parent. :) Just like the words "actor" and "actress" are two gender-specific words which describe the same occupation. :)
 
Upvote 0

JWNEWMAN

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2006
5,182
136
✟21,154.00
Faith
Christian
Hmm... It depends on what you mean by "mother" and "father". When it comes to reproduction, then there's is a biological difference between the mother and the father, because it's the mother that gets pregnant. :) But I didn't mean biological differences based on anatomy... I meant the traditional gender roles, such as the idea of men having more authority, and stuff like that. :) Outside of biological differences when it comes to reproduction, "mother" and "father" are just two gender-specific words for the same thing... a parent. :) Just like the words "actor" and "actress" are two gender-specific words which describe the same occupation. :)
Some people just can't admit to being wrong. Sometimes I'm in that club but, this time it's definitely you.
 
Upvote 0

Danyc

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2007
1,799
100
✟9,970.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Hmm... It depends on what you mean by "mother" and "father". When it comes to reproduction, then there's is a biological difference between the mother and the father, because it's the mother that gets pregnant. :) But I didn't mean biological differences based on anatomy... I meant the traditional gender roles, such as the idea of men having more authority, and stuff like that. :) Outside of biological differences when it comes to reproduction, "mother" and "father" are just two gender-specific words for the same thing... a parent. :) Just like the words "actor" and "actress" are two gender-specific words which describe the same occupation. :)

Here's proof that a mother is a gender-specific role: Can a man be a mother?

Heck no. That's why there are gender specific roles. Only a woman can be a mother. Gender specific.

Anyways, calling ANYTHING sexist is automatically fallible, because as soon as you change it to the opposite sex, the other can view it as sexist towards them!

What if God created man for women?
Well then he'd be sexist against men, wouldn't he?

What if God made the Messiah a woman?
Well, he'd be sexist against men wouldn't he?

You see, it doesn't matter, because either way, one sex will view it as sexist. If it's the other way around, the opposite sex will view it as sexist. So complaining that God is sexist is a total waste of time.
 
Upvote 0

FLANDIDLYANDERS

When I am slain may my corpse lie facing the Enemy
Aug 16, 2005
3,687
278
47
Pompey
✟12,836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
We see in both the old and the new covenants where all peoples are invited by God to become disciples. The NT gives us the beginnings of the outreach of that message to the world. We see the foundation of the teachings herein. It began with the Jews. That is obvious why do you ask such a question?

Ignorance of what the scriptures is rampant among so many.

(perhaps the rest of my response would best belong in its own thread)


So, you say that it has been established in scripture that other races and peoples are treated equally in the church, even though they are not named. And yet at the same time you say that women - who are given leadership roles within the Bible - are not included equally in the church.

And your defence is to say that I am ignorant?
 
Upvote 0

FLANDIDLYANDERS

When I am slain may my corpse lie facing the Enemy
Aug 16, 2005
3,687
278
47
Pompey
✟12,836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
You see, it doesn't matter, because either way, one sex will view it as sexist. If it's the other way around, the opposite sex will view it as sexist. So complaining that God is sexist is a total waste of time.

I would not say that 'in Christ there is no male nor female' is sexist in any way.

But mans predisposition towards dominion is. As it would be if and when it is seen in women.
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,337
1,471
37
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟133,073.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Some people just can't admit to being wrong. Sometimes I'm in that club but, this time it's definitely you.
Well, you haven't proven anything yet... you just gave an example without even explaining it. How exactly are "mother" and "father" roles? The only difference is that, because of anatomy, a mother is able to get pregnant, while a father can't. But it's not a role, it's a possibility.
Here's proof that a mother is a gender-specific role: Can a man be a mother?
With exactly the same logic, I could say that being an actress is a gender-specific role, because a man can't be an actress, but an actor. However, the words "actress" and "actor" mean exactly the same thing, they are just two grammatical forms of the same word.
Anyways, calling ANYTHING sexist is automatically fallible, because as soon as you change it to the opposite sex, the other can view it as sexist towards them!
Yes, if it was changed to the opposite sex, it would be still sexist.
What if God created man for women?
Well then he'd be sexist against men, wouldn't he?
Yes. God created people for other people. No gender here, just... people. :)
What if God made the Messiah a woman?
Well, he'd be sexist against men wouldn't he?
No... Jesus had to have some physical attributes. Gender was just one of them, and the other were things like skin color, hair color, etc. Just because Jesus had a specific hair color it doesn't mean that God is prejudiced against other skin colors. And it's the same with gender. :)
You see, it doesn't matter, because either way, one sex will view it as sexist. If it's the other way around, the opposite sex will view it as sexist. So complaining that God is sexist is a total waste of time.
Well, I'm not complaining that God is sexist, I'm saying that God isn't sexist. :)
 
Upvote 0

Varik

Junior Member
Jul 19, 2007
82
14
Arkansas
✟7,767.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Men and women were made for different roles of which none are more important than the other. They are of similar importance and work to build a society that will thrive. They are only of different importance today because women demean there roles (motherhood, the good wife, caregiver,etc) and men shirk off there responsibilities (father, spiritually leader, governmental head, etc).
 
Upvote 0

chris777

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2006
2,005
114
GA
✟17,817.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So, you say that it has been established in scripture that other races and peoples are treated equally in the church, even though they are not named. And yet at the same time you say that women - who are given leadership roles within the Bible - are not included equally in the church.
well Judging from this response to an earlier quote.
By the OPs rationale, God is RACIST too. I see only Jews and a handfull of non-Jewish Middle-Easterners in the Bible.

God has no plan for Europeans, Australians, Japanese, Orientals and especially those Americans.
The gospel is to be preached to all nations, what part of all are any of the above omitted from?

The scriptures provide the history of the church, and provide guidance for it, including specific roles, for specific people.
That does not change because it is 2007.
their were slaves then, their are slaves now, maby not in your nation or mine, but they still exist somewhere, and so verses addressing them are still relevant.
Just as verses defining roles for men and women are, I had elaborated a bit in my original post before retracting the majority for possible posting in a new thread to hopefully shed further light upon the debate, but just as some of these tend to snowball, I plan on saying my piece, and then letting the chips fall where they may.

And your defence is to say that I am ignorant?
more of an observation of many in these boards.
You take offense just as many others do, at what you perceive as in justice, yet have you asked if it really is in just?
if so then why?
I assume you like many others perceive such verses in the scripture as perverted by men, and their agendas, yet in your very opposition you are purveying your own agenda.
I can see from your profile you are an amalgamation of many different beliefs ,and ideas, yet in doing so you are forced to compromise.
My response was based in your mentioning groups of people who did not exist at the time of the writing of the scriptures, and your assessment that means Gos is racist, I concluded that your response
Was based on your ignorance of what they actually say, as it is demonstrative of that notion. Having been brought out of my own amalgamated belief system I identify with it totally, but I was Ignorant of the scriptures myself for he majority of my life ,taking in anything, and everything provided, as long as it appealed to me.
When I became a Christian, I learned I had to give up, my childish things, and die to my self, in doing so I realized I had been indoctrinated with the vast majority of the beliefs I held without examining those beliefs to see if they were valid, or frankly if they evened worked.
Case in point this issue precisely, I originally assumed that the scriptures were corrupt , and that men and women were "equal"
and that equality meant that roles were shared, and interchangeable
But upon further examination of the scriptures, as well as how the dynamics of what they spoke of actually worked I had to give up my old preconception and concede I was wrong, and God was right.

But for example, I noticed in your interest you are a polymath, but have you ever heard of the old saying "jack of all trades, master of none"? it does ring true no matter how "good" you are at some skill, their is always someone better., and in many cases while you might have an interest in say medicine, you do not necessarily want to place the life of another person in your own hands should they get into an automobile accident.

As for the scriptures I found it most useful to Take preconceptions out of the mix and read what the scriptures say, and then ponder why they are right.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JWNEWMAN

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2006
5,182
136
✟21,154.00
Faith
Christian
So, you say that it has been established in scripture that other races and peoples are treated equally in the church, even though they are not named. And yet at the same time you say that women - who are given leadership roles within the Bible - are not included equally in the church.

And your defence is to say that I am ignorant?
I hate to be misquoted: But it seems my opponents can't help but do that. Scripture teaches, as Jesus emphasized that, all men are our neighbors and, we are to love our neighbor as ourselves. I'm saying that is what scripture has plainly taught, I'm not saying it was practiced.

Also, equality is not at issue here. Roles are. It is clear in both the OT and the NT that the male is given the authoritative roles in both the sanctuary OT and the Church NT (and home). This is authority it has nothing whatsoever to do with equality. The wrong use and exercise of authority can result in treatment that is not equal. However, if you and I work together and you are in authority over me that does not diminish my value as a person. It does define perimeters but does not change the value.

Additionally I did not call you ignorant.
 
Upvote 0

chris777

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2006
2,005
114
GA
✟17,817.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
God isn't a sexist, but Moses was. Moses' laws were not God's laws. God merely gave Moses the authority to give laws according to his imperfect wisdom, which fell short of God's perfect wisdom.
You have zero proof Moses was sexist, it is your opinion.
And the opinion of that cult site you posted in the other thread.
its baseless.
 
Upvote 0

Danyc

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2007
1,799
100
✟9,970.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Well, you haven't proven anything yet... you just gave an example without even explaining it. How exactly are "mother" and "father" roles? The only difference is that, because of anatomy, a mother is able to get pregnant, while a father can't. But it's not a role, it's a possibility.

You think that a mother is not a role? Then what the heck is a 'role'? A role is a function or position played by a certain person. Now, being a mother is a function or position played by a certain person. But a mother can only be a woman. This means it is a gender-specific role.


With exactly the same logic, I could say that being an actress is a gender-specific role, because a man can't be an actress, but an actor. However, the words "actress" and "actor" mean exactly the same thing, they are just two grammatical forms of the same word.

No, they're not the same thing, because an actress is a woman who acts, and an actor is a man who acts. Now, a woman cannot be an actor. A woman can ONLY be an actress. This makes both terms gender-specific roles.


Yes. God created people for other people. No gender here, just... people. :)

I dunno where it says that in the Bible, on the contrary, it states that the woman was made for the man. It did not say that a person was made for a person.

No... Jesus had to have some physical attributes. Gender was just one of them, and the other were things like skin color, hair color, etc. Just because Jesus had a specific hair color it doesn't mean that God is prejudiced against other skin colors. And it's the same with gender. :)

I'm really playing Devil's Advocate here, but others would argue that it would make god racist. God can do anything, can't he? Why couldn't he make the Messiah every race at the same time? Not saying I agree with this, just some food for thought.
 
Upvote 0

JWNEWMAN

Senior Veteran
Oct 6, 2006
5,182
136
✟21,154.00
Faith
Christian
Originally Posted by *Starlight*
No... Jesus had to have some physical attributes. Gender was just one of them, and the other were things like skin color, hair color, etc. Just because Jesus had a specific hair color it doesn't mean that God is prejudiced against other skin colors. And it's the same with gender. :)

He could have been a hermaphrodite. We are told he was a male. With regard to race he could only be Jewish in order to fulfill the prophecies. Darn, he could only be male also, to fulfill the prophecies. Oh well.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

chris777

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2006
2,005
114
GA
✟17,817.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
God is merciful to women for not putting them in authority. :p

Amen to that, I would gladly give it up any day of the week.

But we are called to do it.

I could be an absentee father, it would be nice not to have that responsibility on my shoulders, but since my child's mother has chosen to do so, My doing it also would leave our child with no parents. (and I do not say this to be demeaning to women, as I know that the situation is typically in the reverse, and hence we are left wit this situation to begin with with so many men abdicating their responsibilities.)
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,337
1,471
37
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟133,073.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
He could have been a hermaphrodite. We are told he was a male. With regard to race he could only be Jewish in order to fulfill the prophecies. Darn, he could only be male also, to fulfill the prophecies. Oh well.
Well, he could, but maybe as a hermaphrodite he wouldn't get such a following and today we wouldn't even know about his existence...
You think that a mother is not a role? Then what the heck is a 'role'? A role is a function or position played by a certain person. Now, being a mother is a function or position played by a certain person. But a mother can only be a woman. This means it is a gender-specific role.

No, they're not the same thing, because an actress is a woman who acts, and an actor is a man who acts. Now, a woman cannot be an actor. A woman can ONLY be an actress. This makes both terms gender-specific roles.
These are just words... just because the English language has separate forms of some words for men and for women, it doesn't automatically mean that God created men and women for different roles. If some language on Earth (and since there are lots of different languages, then it's actually quite possible) had a word which sounds differently when you use it to refer to people with different skin colors, would you say that it proves that God created races to have different roles?
I dunno where it says that in the Bible, on the contrary, it states that the woman was made for the man. It did not say that a person was made for a person.
Maybe it's not in the Bible... but there are people actually living in this world, not just the ones described in the Bible, so I look at them and I don't see anything which makes genders different, apart from some anatomical things. I see people being there for other people, since I think no one is totally independent from everyone else, we're all interdependent.
I'm really playing Devil's Advocate here, but others would argue that it would make god racist. God can do anything, can't he? Why couldn't he make the Messiah every race at the same time? Not saying I agree with this, just some food for thought.

How could Jesus be every race at the same time? I think it's similar to the idea of God making a square circle ;)
 
Upvote 0

Danyc

Senior Member
Nov 2, 2007
1,799
100
✟9,970.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
These are just words... just because the English language has separate forms of some words for men and for women, it doesn't automatically mean that God created men and women for different roles. If some language on Earth (and since there are lots of different languages, then it's actually quite possible) had a word which sounds differently when you use it to refer to people with different skin colors, would you say that it proves that God created races to have different roles?

No, it wouldn't, because a specific race doesn't play a specific role. It's just a race. Now then, Actors and actresses DO play roles. They act. That is their role. Now if you want to get extremely technical, I suppose you could say that one race's role is to be that race,but I'm not even going to go there.

The point is, there are gender-specific roles, because some roles are impossible for a man to play or a woman to play. A Mother, for instance. And to be absolutely sure, I use mother as an all-encompassing term for every language's word for 'mother'. I still don't see why that should even make a difference, though.


Maybe it's not in the Bible... but there are people actually living in this world, not just the ones described in the Bible, so I look at them and I don't see anything which makes genders different, apart from some anatomical things. I see people being there for other people, since I think no one is totally independent from everyone else, we're all interdependent.

I guess we're talking about two different things. I was simply referring to the passage in Genesis which states that God made women for man. I wasn't talking about the general state of things in the modern-day world.


How could Jesus be every race at the same time? I think it's similar to the idea of God making a square circle ;)

I guess God isn't omnipotent, then. I mean, I don't think he is either; like I said, Devils Advocate.

Off-topic, but:
How can God be Omnipotent when such contradictions appear? I mean, I don't know if anybody can still think God is omnipotent if he can't do some things. Like, he can't make a rock that he can't move. Or he can't make a wall too high for him to climb over. What's up with that?
 
Upvote 0

*Starlight*

Let the Dragon ride again on the winds of time
Jan 19, 2005
75,337
1,471
37
Right in front of you *waves*
Visit site
✟133,073.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Single
No, it wouldn't, because a specific race doesn't play a specific role. It's just a race. Now then, Actors and actresses DO play roles. They act. That is their role.
Yes... that's the role of both actors and actresses. :)
Now if you want to get extremely technical, I suppose you could say that one race's role is to be that race,but I'm not even going to go there.

The point is, there are gender-specific roles, because some roles are impossible for a man to play or a woman to play. A Mother, for instance. And to be absolutely sure, I use mother as an all-encompassing term for every language's word for 'mother'. I still don't see why that should even make a difference, though.
Yes, I guess you could say that in reproduction a mother and a father can have different roles, because the father can't get pregnant, and the mother can. But that's simply a result of the biological differences between the mother and the father's reproductive systems. Whenever I talk about gender roles here, I mean traditional gender roles, such as the ones from the OP, not biological ones
I guess we're talking about two different things. I was simply referring to the passage in Genesis which states that God made women for man. I wasn't talking about the general state of things in the modern-day world.
Yes, it's true that in the Genesis story Eve was made for Adam. Personally I don't believe that the story is literally true, but if we assume that it is, then it still doesn't say that God created women for men, but just that God created one particular person for another particular person, because the first person was alone. Gender is irrelevant here. The first person was alone, so God created another person to change that. And the reproductive systems of both people together could be used by them to reproduce - that's the only purpose of gender here.
I guess God isn't omnipotent, then. I mean, I don't think he is either; like I said, Devils Advocate.

Off-topic, but:
How can God be Omnipotent when such contradictions appear? I mean, I don't know if anybody can still think God is omnipotent if he can't do some things. Like, he can't make a rock that he can't move. Or he can't make a wall too high for him to climb over. What's up with that?
I think it's an interesting paradox :) I'm not sure, but I think I've just came up with a way to explain it.. I'm not sure how good it is. God doesn't have any specific physical form, so he's not limited by physical attributes of anything, such as height or weight. However, since God is omnipotent, he can create a temporary physical manifestation (avatar) of himself, which could have such physical limitations that it wouldn't be able to lift rocks which are too heavy, or climb over walls which are too high. :)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

FLANDIDLYANDERS

When I am slain may my corpse lie facing the Enemy
Aug 16, 2005
3,687
278
47
Pompey
✟12,836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
I hate to be misquoted:

I did not call you ignorant.

My apologies.

The defence that distinct 'roles' is not sexist is well worn. Male and female are distinct but equal, and such distinctions vary from person to person, not gender to gender.

To say that women cant lead because Eve sined, we may as well say that all men will sit by and watch women sin without saying a thing, as Adam did.

Pauls references in this instance are typical of Rabinic irony, in using established tradition to make a radical point. In this case, let women learn.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.