The Law of Love
When different religions all claim to be the one and only true religion, it is necessary that there be some test of Divine truth to which the claims of each must be submitted, that the one true religion may be distinguished from the false. It is self evident that only God himself can supply this test, for all true knowledge of God relies upon His self-revelation. Since Gods glory in man and mans spiritual well-being alike depend on his possessing a true knowledge of God, it is certain that God has provided that Self-revelation, being in accordance with which is the test of true religion.
The test of true religion
The crucial test of true religion is the Law of God which says: Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself (Deut.6:5; 10:12; 11:1,13,22; 13:3; 30:16,20; Lev.19:18; Deut.10:19).
God has made perfect obedience to this Law of Love the condition of receiving eternal life: Ye shall therefore keep my statutes, and my judgements: which if a man do, he shall live in them: I am the Lord (Lev.18:5).
Moreover, God has pronounced His curse on all who transgress this Law. This is necessary in order to reveal His infinite righteousness and implacable hostility to the rebellion of disobedience. Cursed is he who does not conform to the words of this Law by doing them (Deut.27:26).
Since it is impossible for sinners to obtain or even help to obtain Eternal Life by their own merits, or to deliver themselves from condemnation, they are wholly dependent for salvation upon God meeting the twofold demands of His Law, both precept and penalty, on their behalf.
The Law of Love reveals that God is Love
Just as human laws are the irrefutable evidence of both the existence and character of human law-givers, so the Law of Love is the irrefutable evidence of both the existence and character of God. Only a God who is Love by Nature could require everyone to love Him and also all their fellow men. Because it is the nature of Love to meet the need of loved ones to the utmost of it's ability, regardless of cost, this law of Love infallibly assured God would meet mans need as a sinner. It is impossible that God should command that everyone love Him unless He Himself loved everyone, and impossible that He should love everyone and not provide salvation for everyone. Thus the Law of Love was itself a prophesy of the Gospel, of Gods redemption for the human race. The one and only true religion will be that which reveals and proclaims that God has provided full redemption for sinners, all of grace, for all of them.
It is impossible that God should not love everyone when only love in Him could have created the capacity to love everyone, and equally impossible that having created everyone in His image and after His likeness, with the capacity to know and love Him, He should not desire to be the supreme object of their love. He has created all things for His glory (Rev.4:11), and mans loving Him secures Him greater glory than mans not loving Him. If God intended some not to love Him, their not loving Him could not be sin. But since all have sinned and come short of the glory of God (Rom.3:23) and sin is the transgression of the law (1Jn.3:4), and because sin is not imputed where there is no law (Rom.5:13), there are none who are not included in the Law of Love.
Since no one can therefore deny that God has commanded every one without exception to love Him, to deny, as A.W. Pink does, that God loves everyone, is grossly to libel the character of God. The theory that Christ only died to save the elect presents to us a God who:
1. Commands everyone to love Him when He Himself does not love everyone.
2. Who will condemn the non-elect in the Judgement Day not for the rejection of Christ since He did not die to save them, but for transgressing the Law which commands them to Love Him when He never intended that they should love Him as His excluding them from all hope of salvation only too clearly proves, and when the Scriptures show condemnation will only be for the rejection of Christ (Jn.3:14-19,36; 8:24; 2Thes.2:11,12);
3. Who commands all to repent and believe the Gospel when for the non-elect there is no Gospel to believe (Mk.1:15; 1Jn.3:24; Acts.17:31; Mk.16:16);
4. Who says blessed are the merciful when He is unmerciful to the non-elect in excluding them from salvation (the vast majority of mankind);
5. Who invites everyone to receive His salvation (Dr. John Owen and Dr. J.I.Packer being witnesses) which He has intended not all should accept.
6. Who by-passes Calvary in writing the names of the non-elect into the Lambs Book of Life only to blot them out again (Rev.3:5; 22:19);
7. Who has two callings of sinners to repentance and faith, the one limited to the elect, for which reason it is termed effectual; the other being the ineffectual calling because it is not intended to be effective. Since this work is through the Holy Spirit He has been appointed to a work rendered ineffectual by Divine decree a God who ordains His own ineffectiveness?! But the theory that all people, including the elect, are spiritually dead in their trespasses and sins in the sense that a corps is dead means it is as vain to call them as the non-elect. The theory that God implants saving faith and repentance to life in the elect as the only means of their salvation makes effectual calling impossible before they receive these gifts, and unnecessary after receiving them.
8. Who calls people fools for only being concerned with the material interests of life, taking no interest in their spiritual and eternal welfare, when He Himself has taken no interest in their spiritual welfare as non-elect (Lk.12:16-21).
Quoted from Christ or Mohammed The Bible or the Koran? by F.S.Copleston. Published by Islams Challenge 1989.
In view of the above...can anyone not worship God?!
Simonline